Search Results

A woman was punched in the face in an unprovoked assault while waiting for a bus in North Vancouver last week on September 19th. What Happened on Marine Drive That Morning North Vancouver RCMP say the assault happened on Friday, September 19, 2025, around 5:30 a.m. The woman and her partner were standing at a bus stop on the northwest corner of Marine Drive and Bewicke Avenue. A man crossed the street and, without warning, punched her in the face. The victim was injured but did not need to be taken to hospital. The suspect fled before officers arrived. Despite patrols and a canvass of nearby CCTV, police were unable to locate him. The unprovoked attack is now being investigated as part of an ongoing North Vancouver assault case. Who Police Are Looking For Investigators have released a description of the suspect. He is described as: Male About five feet tall Thin build Shoulder-length hair Wearing a grey hoodie and black jeans RCMP Appeal in North Vancouver Assault Investigation RCMP are asking for anyone who was in the area between 5:15 a.m. and 5:45 a.m. to come forward. They are especially interested in dash cam or surveillance video that may have captured the suspect. Anyone with information is asked to call North Vancouver RCMP at 604-985-1311 and quote file number 25-19906. Why Commuters Are Paying Attention The attack happened at a busy transit stop along Marine Drive, an area used by early morning riders. The suspect remains unidentified, leaving open questions about who he is and whether he may strike again. For many people, the thought of being targeted at random while waiting for a bus highlights how quickly routine moments can turn unsafe. The Numbers Behind North Vancouver Crime According to the most recently publicized crime statistics for the City of North Vancouver, the overall crime severity index fell by 5.4% in 2024. However, the violent crime severity index rose by 20.8% over the same period. These 2024 figures are the most current local data available.

You are walking home in Vancouver at night. Police patrols are scarce, response times feel slow, and the SkyTrain platform can feel empty when you need it most. Now Ottawa’s Canada gun buyback program is beginning, and even the federal Public Safety Minister was caught on tape saying municipal police do not have the resources to enforce it. He’s not the only one. Police chiefs across Canada have warned the program would overwhelm forces already stretched thin. The Ontario Provincial Police have refused to take part, and provinces like Alberta and Saskatchewan have passed laws to block their officers from being used. The federal government insists the buyback will go ahead, but the unresolved question for Vancouver is: will it come at the cost of local safety? What Exactly Is the Canada Gun Buyback Program - and Does It Target the Guns Used in Crime? In May 2020, Ottawa banned more than 1,500 models of assault-style firearms, including AR-15s and Ruger Mini-14s. Bill C-21, passed in December 2023, gave the ban teeth by creating the Canada gun buyback program. The idea is simple: owners surrender their prohibited firearms in exchange for set compensation, ranging from just over $1,300 for an AR-15 to more than $6,000 for certain Swiss Arms rifles. A pilot for individuals began in Nova Scotia in September 2025, and British Columbia is expected to join in 2026. But here’s the catch: most guns used in violent crime in Canada are not these rifles. National statistics show nearly half involve handguns — and those aren’t part of the buyback. Even Police Chiefs Say They Do Not Have the Resources - So Who Will Enforce It? The loudest warnings about the Canada gun buyback program have come from police themselves. The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police has said plainly the buyback would be an “administrative burden” on officers already struggling to meet demand. Regina Police Chief Evan Bray called it “a massive amount of work.” The Ontario Provincial Police have declined to participate altogether. And in September 2025, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree was recorded saying: “Let’s be frank about this: I just don’t think municipal police services have the resources to [enforce] this.” He later walked the comment back in Parliament, calling it “misguided.” But for residents who already feel police are absent when needed most, the remark reinforced a suspicion: if the minister doesn’t believe the buyback can be enforced, who will? If Officers Handle Buyback Duties, Who’s Left on Vancouver’s Streets? In Vancouver, the concern is not just about whether the Canada gun buyback program works. It is about whether it makes the city feel less safe. Police are already stretched with calls about assaults, street disorder, and late-night disturbances downtown. Women riding the SkyTrain report harassment and unwanted contact, often with no officer nearby. Every officer reassigned to handle buyback paperwork or weapon collection is one less officer visible on Granville Street on a Friday night. The Vancouver Police Department has not confirmed how it will be involved once the program reaches B.C. in 2026. Without new federal funding, the choices are stark: use local officers, rely on RCMP detachments, or contract out. Until Ottawa clarifies, the uncertainty fuels concern that resources could be pulled away from frontline patrols. For Women in Vancouver, Safety Concerns Go Beyond Firearms For women in Vancouver, the debate feels immediate. Violent crime with firearms is rare compared to other offences, but safety concerns persist. Transit Police data show most sex-related offences on SkyTrain lines involve harassment or unwanted touching. Vancouver Police reports list assaults and robberies as among the most common street-level crimes. Nationally, nearly half of all firearm-related violent crime involves handguns. In Toronto, where tracing is more robust, police say most of those handguns are smuggled from the U.S. rather than owned by licensed Canadians. Vancouver doesn’t release comparable tracing data, leaving residents in the dark about how many local crimes involve legally owned versus illicit guns. For women, that gap matters less than the basics: whether police will be on the street, in transit stations, and ready to respond when they need them. That is why the buyback debate resonates here — not as an abstract policy, but as a question of visible safety. Why Provinces Like Alberta and Saskatchewan Are Refusing to Help The resource question around the Canada gun buyback program has become political. Alberta passed its own firearms law in 2022, making it clear its officers will not enforce the federal buyback. Saskatchewan followed with similar legislation. Both argue the program unfairly targets lawful owners while leaving the problem of smuggled guns unresolved. British Columbia hasn’t taken that line. But the concerns raised by other provinces echo in Vancouver: if Ottawa expects local police to carry the burden without providing funding, it could weaken patrols in communities already pressing for more visible policing. The federal government has extended the amnesty for prohibited firearms until March 1, 2026, and set aside $742 million for compensation. What remains unclear is whether any of that funding will cover the cost of police enforcement. 4 Questions Vancouver Residents Should Be Asking About the Buyback As the buyback moves from pilot to full rollout, here are the key questions Vancouver residents should watch: 1. Who will enforce it?  Municipal police, RCMP detachments, or third-party contractors? 2. Will Ottawa pay?  Or will enforcement be added to local police workloads without extra resources? 3. How much funding will B.C. get?  Of the $742 million budget, how much will actually flow to the province? 4. What happens to patrols?  Will buyback duties mean fewer officers downtown and on transit? The answers will shape whether the program enhances safety or leaves Vancouver residents with fewer police where they feel they need them most. The Real Issue for Vancouver: Will Police Still Show Up When You Call? The federal Canada gun buyback program is meant to remove assault-style firearms from circulation, but in Vancouver the real worry is about what gets lost in the process. Police leaders across Canada say their forces are stretched too thin, and provinces are refusing to participate. The federal minister himself admitted as much in private. For Vancouver, the question isn’t whether the program works on paper — it’s whether an officer will still be there the next time someone calls for help on a SkyTrain platform or a downtown street. Until Ottawa explains how enforcement will be handled, that uncertainty is at the heart of the buyback debate.

The list of guns banned in Canada now includes hundreds of rifles. Supporters call them military-style weapons that threaten public safety. Critics argue many are ordinary hunting rifles caught in a political fight. Five models stand out in the debate. Each has been linked to campus shootings, mass killings, or ongoing controversy. Their history, design, and video evidence of how they fire raise the question of whether they belong in the field or should be banned outright. Guns Banned in Canada: Hunting Rifles or Assault Weapons? You Watch and Decide 1. Ruger Mini-14 – From Polytechnique to Nova Scotia In 1989, a gunman used a Ruger Mini-14 at Montreal’s École Polytechnique to kill 14 women. Decades later, the same rifle appeared in the 2020 Nova Scotia rampage, one of the deadliest mass shootings in Canadian history. The Mini-14 is a semi-automatic rifle chambered in .223 caliber, the same round used in many AR-15s. In Canada, it is limited to five rounds per magazine. It has long been sold as a “ranch rifle” for controlling coyotes or varmints, yet it can also fire rapidly with minimal recoil. Supporters of the ban argue that its history in attacks against women makes it too dangerous for civilian use. Critics counter that among the guns banned in Canada, the Mini-14 is one of the most disputed because it looks and functions like an ordinary hunting rifle. 2. Beretta Cx4 Storm – Dawson College’s Campus Shooting In 2006, a gunman carried a Beretta Cx4 Storm into Dawson College in Montreal, killing one student and injuring 19 others. The Cx4 Storm is a semi-automatic carbine chambered in 9mm pistol ammunition. In Canada, it is restricted to 10-round magazines. Lightweight and easy to handle, it has a futuristic appearance that makes it stand out from traditional rifles. For supporters of the ban, the Storm represents a tactical-style weapon with no hunting purpose. Critics note that it fires the same ammunition as many handguns and argue that banning it is based more on appearance than function. 3. AR-15 – The School Shooter’s Weapon of Choice The AR-15 has become the most infamous rifle linked to school shootings. In the U.S., variants were used at Sandy Hook, Parkland, and Uvalde. In Canada, an AR-15 variant, the Colt LE6940, was carried during the 2020 Nova Scotia attacks. This rifle is semi-automatic, chambered in .223/5.56 caliber, and accepts detachable magazines, though Canadian law limits it to five rounds. It is lightweight, accurate, and highly customizable. Military forces worldwide use similar rifles in select-fire versions. The government describes it as a battlefield weapon that should not be in civilian hands. Within the broader list of guns banned in Canada, the AR-15 is the most internationally recognized symbol of an assault-style rifle. Owners argue that AR-15s were already restricted in Canada to shooting ranges and rarely appeared in crimes before the ban. 4. M14 / M305 – The Military Classic in Civilian Hands In 2014, a gunman in Moncton, New Brunswick, used an M14 rifle to kill three RCMP officers. The Norinco M305, a low-cost clone of the M14, was especially popular among Canadian hunters. The M14 is a semi-automatic rifle chambered in .308 (7.62 NATO). It is heavier and more powerful than an AR-15, capable of hunting large game such as moose. In Canada, magazines are limited to five rounds. Supporters of the ban point to its role in the Moncton tragedy and its military origins. Critics argue it is an outdated, heavy rifle that many hunters and sport shooters used responsibly for decades. 5. Vz.58 – The AK’s Twin in Quebec City In 2017, the Quebec City mosque attacker carried a Vz.58 rifle, which jammed after two shots. Its presence alone tied it permanently to Canada’s gun debate. The Vz.58 looks like an AK-47 but is mechanically different. It fires 7.62×39mm rounds, common in hunting rifles. In Canada, magazines over five rounds have been illegal since the 1990s, yet supporters of the ban argue larger mags are easy to smuggle across the border. For officials, its military style and role in a mass shooting justify prohibition. Critics say it works like many hunting rifles and question why it belongs on the list of guns banned in Canada at all. Why Supporters Say Canada’s Assault-Style Gun Ban Saves Lives For those in favor, these rifles are tied to Canada’s darkest shootings. They argue that guns designed for fast, repeated fire give attackers an edge that no hunter needs. Survivors of Polytechnique and Dawson College have long called for tighter rules, saying these weapons symbolize threats to women and students. Supporters also warn that even with five-round magazine limits, smuggled high-capacity magazines are easy to find. That, they say, means the danger is not just theoretical but real. Hunting Rifles or Political Theatre? What Opponents Claim About the Gun Buyback Opponents say the ban unfairly targets licensed owners while doing little to stop crime. They point out that most shootings in Canada involve smuggled handguns, not rifles used on farms or at ranges. To them, calling a Mini-14 or an M305 an “assault weapon” is more about optics than function. Critics argue the buyback spends billions of dollars removing guns banned in Canada that were rarely used in street crime, while smuggling and gang violence continue unchecked. They frame the ban as a symbolic move that punishes people who followed the law while leaving real problems unsolved. Hunting Rifle or Assault Weapon: Should These Guns Stay Banned in Canada? After watching the footage, do you believe the guns banned in Canada should stay prohibited, or are they misunderstood hunting rifles? Share your view below 👇 Canada Gun Ban FAQ What guns are banned in Canada in 2025? Canada’s buyback program targets hundreds of firearms labeled as assault-style weapons. Some of the most controversial include the Ruger Mini-14, Beretta Cx4 Storm, AR-15, M14/M305, and Vz.58. Why are some hunting rifles banned in Canada? Supporters say these rifles are linked to Canada’s worst shootings and argue their rapid-fire design makes them too dangerous. Critics argue many are ordinary hunting rifles banned mainly for how they look. What is Canada’s gun buyback program? The buyback requires owners of banned rifles to surrender them for compensation. The government says this reduces public risk, while opponents claim it unfairly punishes licensed owners instead of targeting smuggled guns.

A former Manitoba RCMP officer has been charged with theft and breach of trust after a driver reported that about $300 went missing during a traffic stop in Portage la Prairie. The officer, identified as Constable Ben Harder, resigned from the force earlier this year while under investigation. According to the RCMP, the alleged incident occurred on November 19, 2024, and was reported eight days later. The complaint prompted an internal investigation monitored by Manitoba’s Independent Investigation Unit. Former RCMP Officer Charged After Alleged Theft During Traffic Stop Investigators say the allegation stems from a November 19 traffic stop in Portage la Prairie, where about $300 was reported missing from a driver’s vehicle. The Manitoba RCMP West District launched an investigation after receiving the complaint on November 27. RCMP Investigation & Oversight Review The investigation included interviews with the complainant and several officers involved. The Independent Investigation Unit of Manitoba confirmed it monitored and later reviewed the RCMP’s findings to ensure the process met oversight standards. Charges & Court Process Harder resigned from the RCMP in January 2025 while the investigation was still underway. Ontario Provincial Police in Norfolk County served him with a summons on October 2, 2025. He is scheduled to appear in Portage la Prairie Provincial Court on October 21. The RCMP said Harder remains presumed innocent while the matter is before the court. Oversight and Public Trust The case has drawn attention because it involves an officer accused of theft during a routine stop, an encounter most drivers expect to be straightforward. The Independent Investigation Unit said its monitoring role helps ensure transparency when police are accused of criminal misconduct. The outcome of the case may shape how future complaints against law enforcement are reviewed in Manitoba and other jurisdictions.

A convicted killer who vanished from a Coquitlam jail in 2022 has been caught in Qatar. Rabih “Robby” Alkhalil, convicted of first-degree murder in a 2012 Vancouver shooting, was living under an alias when Interpol tracked him down overseas. His capture ends one of Canada’s longest manhunts and exposes how a dangerous inmate walked out of a high-security jail without being stopped. The case has reignited questions about how secure B.C.’s correctional facilities really are. Who Is Rabih Alkhalil & How Did He Escape? Alkhalil was on trial for murder when he escaped North Fraser Pretrial Centre on July 21, 2022. He had been accused of organizing the 2012 killing of Sandip Duhre, a prominent figure in Vancouver’s gang world. Even after his disappearance, the court continued the trial and convicted him in absentia in 2023. At the time, he was already serving a life sentence for a separate 2017 gang murder in Ontario. How Two Contractors Walked a Killer Out the Front Door Investigators say two men arrived at the jail dressed as construction workers with fake papers and reflective vests. Guards believed they were legitimate contractors and let them in without verifying their credentials. Within minutes, the men led Alkhalil through secure corridors and out a main exit to a white van disguised as a service vehicle. By the time staff realized what had happened, the trio had disappeared. Who Helped Him and What Went Wrong? The RCMP’s organized crime unit and B.C. Corrections launched a joint investigation within hours. By 2025, three men were charged with conspiracy and aiding the escape, including one later arrested in Spain. Investigators say falsified work orders and insider deception made the plan possible. Since then, B.C. Corrections has introduced stricter ID checks and new escort policies for all contractors. Canadian Killer Caught in Qatar: Will He Return to Canada? In 2025, Interpol confirmed the Canadian killer caught in Qatar after a three-year international search. He had been living under a false name and was detained by local authorities working with international partners. Bringing him home is now a diplomatic challenge. Canada and Qatar have no extradition treaty, meaning officials must negotiate directly for his return. Why Did a Secure Jail Miss the Warning Signs? North Fraser Pretrial Centre holds some of B.C.’s highest-risk offenders, yet two impostors gained access without detection. Investigators later confirmed that basic contractor screening was not followed that day. The Ministry of Public Safety admitted to serious procedural gaps but has not released its full internal report. Officials say new security protocols are now in place at every provincial facility. How Often Do Prison Escapes Really Happen? Federal data shows roughly two dozen escapes between 2021 and 2024, most from low-security institutions. The Alkhalil case stood out because it exposed how easily human error can defeat advanced security. Experts say this incident forced a national rethink of staffing, verification, and communication between correctional agencies. They warn that coordinated escapes like this are rare but always possible when oversight breaks down. Could It Happen Again and Should You Worry? When Alkhalil escaped, police described him as dangerous and urged the public not to approach him. For several days, Metro Vancouver residents were unsure whether he remained in the region. Officials now insist that new protocols and communication systems are designed to prevent another breach. Still, advocates argue the public should be notified faster if high-risk inmates ever escape again. What Happens Next Canadian officials are negotiating with Qatar to return Alkhalil to Canada. Without a formal treaty, the process could take months or stall entirely if Qatar refuses. Meanwhile, court cases continue against the men accused of helping him flee. B.C. Corrections faces growing pressure to release its internal review and show what has changed since the 2022 escape.

You’re running late for work and roll through an intersection just as the light turns red. You didn’t see a flash, so you didn't get a fine, right? Maybe not. Vancouver’s upgraded intersection cameras can now ticket drivers for both red-light and speeding violations, even without a visible flash. This guide explains where the cameras are, how much over the limit triggers a fine, and what to do if one shows up in your mailbox. Do Speed Cameras Really Exist in Vancouver? You might think Vancouver only has red-light cameras, but the system has changed. The province upgraded dozens of intersections with speed detection, meaning you can be fined even if the light is green. There are 140 Intersection Safety Cameras across British Columbia, with 35 in Metro Vancouver that also record speeding. These aren’t hidden vans or highway traps — they’re fixed cameras at major intersections like Boundary and 49th, Kingsway and Joyce, and Grandview and Rupert. How Fast Is Too Fast for a Speed Camera in BC? You might think a few kilometres over the limit is fine, but the truth isn’t that simple. The province keeps its exact speed thresholds secret to prevent drivers from “gaming” the system. Officials say cameras only ticket vehicles going “well over” the posted limit, but that can vary by intersection. Data shows tickets have been issued for speeds as high as 90 km/h in a 30 zone, yet someone driving 59 in a 50 usually won’t trigger a fine. Red Light & Speed Camera Locations in Vancouver (Verified) Vancouver doesn’t use speed cameras everywhere — only specific intersections under the Intersection Safety Camera (ISC) program . Here are some known intersections in Vancouver that have cameras (red-light or red + speed): Boundary Road & E 49 Avenue E Hastings Street & Renfrew Street Grandview Highway & Rupert Street Granville Street & King Edward Avenue Kingsway & Joyce Street What Happens When You Get a Camera Ticket in BC You won’t find a ticket tucked under your wiper or handed to you by police. It’s mailed to the registered owner after the violation is reviewed and confirmed by RoadSafetyBC. The fine is usually $167 for a red-light ticket or $120 to $480 for speeding, depending on how far over the limit you were going. Pay within 30 days to save $25, or dispute it within 45 days to fight it in court. Should You Pay or Dispute a Speed Camera Ticket? Most people pay the fine and move on, but that isn’t your only option. There’s no extra penalty for disputing, and some tickets get withdrawn if the evidence package is incomplete. Lawyers in British Columbia say to dispute only if you have a clear reason, such as an error in your vehicle plate, date, or camera calibration. If the photo and data are solid, it’s often cheaper and faster to pay early and take the $25 discount. What Happens If You Dispute a Speed Camera Ticket Filing a dispute doesn’t mean standing in front of a judge right away. You’ll first receive a court date, and the province must provide disclosure showing the photo, time, and equipment details. If the evidence is missing or incorrect, the case can be thrown out. If it’s complete, the judge decides based on the documents, not the officer, and there are usually no extra court costs for trying. Is Photo Radar Back in BC? You might have heard that photo radar is returning to British Columbia. The truth is more complicated. The old photo radar vans from the 1990s were scrapped after public backlash, but today’s Intersection Safety Cameras serve a similar purpose. The difference is transparency: these cameras are fixed, publicly listed, and focused on high-risk intersections rather than random roadside traps. Frequently Asked Questions About Speed and Red Light Cameras in Vancouver 1. Does Vancouver have speed cameras? Yes. Vancouver’s intersection cameras can now ticket drivers for both red-light and speeding violations at select intersections. 2. How much over the speed limit can you go in BC? The province doesn’t publish an exact number, but tickets are issued only to vehicles going well over the limit. Someone driving 59 in a 50 zone usually won’t get fined. 3. Do red light cameras flash in Vancouver? Some do, but newer cameras use invisible infrared light instead of a visible flash. You might not notice anything when the photo is taken. 4. How do I know if I got a red-light or speed ticket in BC? You’ll receive a ticket by mail if your vehicle was recorded breaking the law. It’s sent to the registered owner, not necessarily the driver. 5. How much are the fines? Red-light tickets cost $167, and speeding fines range from $120 to $480 depending on how far over the limit you were. Pay within 30 days to save $25. 6. Will I get demerit points? No. Camera tickets don’t add points to your licence because they’re issued to the vehicle owner, not the driver. 7. Is it worth disputing a camera ticket? You can dispute without extra penalties if you believe the evidence is wrong or incomplete. If everything checks out, it’s usually faster and cheaper to pay early. What to Remember About Vancouver’s Speed Cameras Speed cameras aren’t everywhere in Vancouver, but the ones that exist are active and accurate. They’ve changed how drivers get caught, with mailed tickets replacing roadside stops. If you see a flash—or even if you don’t—it’s worth knowing what comes next. Check your mail, understand the fine, and make an informed choice about whether to pay or dispute.

Young people across Vancouver have given up on the idea of buying a home in the city where they grew up. Even stable jobs and dual incomes cannot compete with prices that keep rising faster than wages. For many, the dream of home ownership has quietly disappeared, and Vancouver housing affordability has become one of the most talked-about crises in Canada. Few know that the forces behind it were not accidental. New research from Chapman University has confirmed that Vancouver’s housing crisis stems from decades of policy choices that limited where and how homes could be built. The report calls it one of the clearest examples of “artificial scarcity” in the world. How did these policies take hold, and why are they still in place today? How Policy Decisions Drove the Collapse of Vancouver Housing Affordability The 2025 Demographia International Housing Affordability Report explains that Vancouver’s unaffordability is not caused by population growth or geography, but by rules that restrict land use and drive up prices. These planning choices, known as urban containment, were designed to stop sprawl and protect green space. Instead, they created one of the world’s most distorted housing markets. As demand rose inside the city’s growth boundary, land values surged, making each new home dramatically more expensive than the last. Canada Has the Land, So Why the Shortage? Vancouver is surrounded by space, yet young people are being squeezed into smaller and smaller areas. Local governments have drawn strict boundaries around where development can happen, blocking expansion into nearby land that could ease pressure on prices. In cities like Calgary or Edmonton, where land use is more flexible, homes cost half as much relative to income. The contrast shows that Canada’s housing shortage is not about land running out. It is about decisions that keep most of it off limits, making it harder each year for ordinary residents to stay in the city they love. How Vancouver Compares to the Rest of the World The same report ranks Vancouver just behind Hong Kong, Sydney, and San Jose, placing it among the most unaffordable cities ever recorded. In each case, the study found that strict growth limits and planning restrictions made land prices soar. Cities without those limits tell a different story. In the United States, places like Houston and Dallas allow development to expand with demand and remain among the most affordable major urban markets in the world. If other cities could change course, could Vancouver do the same? What These Policies Are Doing to Vancouver’s Future High prices are reshaping who can live in Vancouver. The city that once felt young and creative now feels reserved for those who bought early or inherited wealth. This shift is slowly hollowing out the middle class that once defined the city. Each policy meant to manage growth is now pushing it away, leaving many to wonder whether the next generation will have a place here at all. What Needs to Change & Why Prices Will Not Drop Without It The researchers behind the Demographia report say affordability will not return unless governments release more land for housing. Densification alone cannot offset the price pressure created by fixed boundaries and limited supply. Interest rates may rise and fall, but scarcity keeps values high. Until the rules that restrict development change, owning a home in Vancouver will remain a privilege few can reach. The question is whether any government will be willing to take that risk. What Vancouver Can Learn from Other Cities Some cities that once faced similar affordability crises have started to reverse course. In Auckland and Houston, reforms that opened more land for development helped stabilize prices and gave younger residents a path back into the market. Vancouver could take the same path if it chooses to. For now, the research offers a reminder that this crisis was made by policy, and that means it can be unmade too.

It is the holidays and you are shopping for something fun but meaningful. Maybe a fidget toy to help a neurodiverse child focus or a gel blaster that looks like a harmless gadget. But many Canadians are now asking are toy guns allowed in Canada, as the 2023 replica firearm laws have changed what counts as a toy and what could be seized as a prohibited weapon. Since the new laws took effect, the RCMP and Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) have stepped up enforcement. Many online sellers still advertise products that no longer meet the definition of a toy under Canadian law. That means a well-intentioned gift could be seized, delayed, or destroyed at the border. Are Toy Guns Allowed in Canada Under the New Law So, are toy guns allowed in Canada? The answer depends on how realistic they appear. Under Criminal Code Section 84, a replica firearm is any object that looks like a real gun capable of firing a projectile faster than 152.4 metres per second (500 ft/s) and over 5.7 joules of energy. Even if a toy cannot fire, if it mimics a real firearm in size, weight, or color, it may still be treated as a replica. The CBSA Memorandum D19-13-2 guides officers to assess realism rather than function. Since the 2023 updates, even toys once considered harmless can now be refused entry. Why So Many Canadians Are Getting Caught Off Guard Online marketplaces often list gel blasters and fidget blasters as toys, even though most no longer meet Canadian import standards. Buyers order them thinking they are safe, only to find out later that the shipment was stopped or confiscated. Here is how CBSA now classifies popular products: Product Shoots Projectiles? Looks Realistic? Legal Risk Fidget blaster No Sometimes Low unless shaped like a real gun Gel blaster Yes Often High, most are treated as replicas Airsoft gun Yes Usually Moderate to high depending on appearance A product that is legal overseas can become illegal the moment it enters Canada. With the 2023 replica firearm law changes, the number of seizures has increased, especially during holiday shopping seasons. The Myths About Orange Tips and “Safe” Toy Guns Many Canadians believe that toy guns are allowed in Canada if they have orange tips, similar to the rule in the United States. This is false. Canada has no orange-tip requirement. The RCMP decides legality based on realism, not color. A toy with an orange muzzle can still be seized if it looks like an authentic firearm. Bright coloring helps, but the law focuses on overall appearance, not paint details. What Happens When Customs Flags Your Order When the CBSA identifies a shipment as a potential replica firearm, the package is detained immediately. Buyers receive a seizure notice explaining why the item violates Canadian import regulations. Refunds from international sellers are uncommon, and appeals are limited to licensed firearm businesses. Police can also respond if someone displays a realistic toy gun in public. Officers must treat every firearm report as genuine until proven otherwise. Even if it turns out to be a toy, charges such as causing a disturbance or mischief can still apply. What to Buy Instead: Safer Toys and Sensory Alternatives If you are buying for anxiety or focus support, you do not need gun-shaped fidget toys. Research shows that sensory tools like fidget cubes, stress balls, or textured rings are just as effective without creating confusion or risk. Experts recommend choosing neutral designs that can be used safely at school or in public. These products offer the same calming benefit without breaking replica firearm laws. For official guidance, see the RCMP Canadian Firearms Program. How to Shop Safely Under the New Rules Buy only from Canadian retailers that comply with RCMP and CBSA regulations. These sellers must follow the updated 2023 replica firearm definitions and cannot sell items that resemble real guns. Avoid listings with words like gel blaster, airsoft, or replica gun. Look for bright colors, clear labeling, and family-friendly packaging. Always keep receipts or screenshots to show the product was sold as a toy in case authorities request proof. The Hidden Mistake That Could Get Your Toy Seized at the Border Canada’s 2023 replica firearm law has quietly changed what counts as a toy. A fidget gun or gel blaster that looks harmless online can now be seized or destroyed without refund if it resembles a real weapon. Before you buy, check where the toy is made, how it looks, and whether the seller follows Canadian import standards. Choosing colorful, clearly toy-like products from domestic retailers can prevent your thoughtful holiday gift from ending up in a CBSA holding facility or classified as a prohibited firearm. Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Canadian firearm and replica laws may change, and rules can vary by product. For current information, contact the RCMP Canadian Firearms Program or the Canada Border Services Agency before purchasing any toy gun or imitation firearm. StaySafeVancouver and the author assume no responsibility for actions taken based on this article.

A TikTok video scrolls by. A group of friends laugh as they step out of a car, aiming colorful toy guns and firing tiny beads at each other. It looks harmless, even fun, until a police cruiser appears in the background of another clip. What started as an online “Orbeez challenge” has evolved into a safety concern in Canada. Across the country, police are responding to calls about what appear to be real firearms. The toys in question are gel blasters, devices that shoot small water-filled beads. They are sold online as fidget gadgets or backyard toys, but their realistic design has drawn the attention of law enforcement and border officials. For Vancouver residents, the issue raises real questions. Are these toys legal? Can they be carried in public? And how did a TikTok trend become a police problem? What Exactly Are Gel Blasters & The Orbeez Challenge? Gel blasters are toy guns that shoot soft polymer beads known as gel balls or Orbeez. The beads are soaked in water before use, causing them to swell into small, squishy projectiles that burst on impact. Many models resemble handguns or rifles, often down to color, size, and design. The “Orbeez challenge” took off on TikTok when creators began filming themselves shooting unsuspecting people or vehicles as a prank. Some used bright, toy-like versions, while others used realistic replicas. In the United States, several incidents resulted in injuries and arrests. By 2024, similar videos began surfacing in Canadian cities, prompting warnings from police across multiple provinces. Are Gel Blasters Legal in Canada? The legality of gel blasters in Canada is complex. Under the Criminal Code, a “replica firearm” is any device that looks with near precision like a real firearm but is not capable of causing serious injury or death. Replica firearms are classified as prohibited devices, meaning they cannot be imported, sold, transferred, or exported. Bill C-21, which received Royal Assent in December 2023, reaffirmed this rule. It clarified that devices closely resembling regulated firearms are prohibited, even if they shoot harmless projectiles. While owning one privately is not automatically a crime, anyone caught importing or displaying one in public may face seizure and potential charges. How CBSA Treats Gel Blasters at the Border The Canada Border Services Agency regularly seizes shipments of gel blasters. Packages ordered from online retailers often arrive labeled as “toys” but are detained because they are considered prohibited replicas. Buyers frequently report on Reddit and hobby forums that their orders are confiscated and never returned. The reasoning is straightforward. If a gel blaster looks too much like a real firearm, it meets the legal definition of a replica. In Canada, bright colors or orange tips do not make the item exempt, unlike in the United States. The visual resemblance to a real gun is what determines legality. Police Warnings and Real Incidents in Canada Across Canada, police departments have issued repeated warnings about the dangers of gel blasters. In 2024, York Regional Police charged several teens in Vaughan after drive-by assaults involving gel-bead projectiles. Winnipeg schools have banned the toys following safety incidents, and RCMP detachments in British Columbia have cautioned residents about public use. Vancouver police have also responded to reports of people carrying what appeared to be guns that turned out to be toys or lighters. Officers note that they must treat every firearm call as real until confirmed otherwise. Even an innocent prank can quickly escalate into a serious encounter. What Happens When Someone Calls 911 About a “Gun” When a firearm is reported, officers respond immediately and with caution. They cannot distinguish a toy from a real weapon until they are on scene. Brandishing or displaying a gel blaster in public can lead to an armed response, detention, or criminal charges such as causing a disturbance or possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose. For young people filming social media content, the consequences can be severe. What seems like a joke online can create panic, trigger a large police response, and lead to long-term legal problems. Safety Risks Beyond the Law Gel blasters pose additional safety and health risks. Health Canada warns that Orbeez and similar water beads can expand inside the body if swallowed or inserted into the ear or nose. This can cause life-threatening blockages, particularly in children. Several hospitals have reported emergency cases linked to these beads. Environmental concerns have also been raised. The beads do not fully biodegrade and can enter waterways through drains or outdoor play. Combined with the potential for public misidentification, these issues make gel blasters a growing focus for regulators and safety advocates. Why the “It’s Just a Toy” Mindset Is Dangerous From a distance or in low light, a gel blaster can look identical to a real handgun. Police officers and bystanders cannot tell the difference until it is too late. Even if the device fires soft beads, its appearance alone is enough to cause panic. In cities like Vancouver, public awareness is critical. Carrying or displaying one of these toys can lead to police intervention or seizure. Understanding how Canadian law views gel blasters is essential to avoiding unnecessary danger. What You Can Do If you already own a gel blaster, keep it at home and never display it in public. Do not attempt to import one from overseas, even if marketed as a fidget toy or replica. Many are intercepted by CBSA and will not be returned. Parents should monitor whether children are playing with gel blasters or water bead products. Health Canada’s safety pages include guidance on safe toy use and product recalls. For social media creators, promoting the “Orbeez challenge” may violate platform guidelines and could draw legal attention if it involves public spaces or nonconsenting participants. In Vancouver, anyone who sees a person with a gun-shaped object should contact the police. For situations that do not appear immediately dangerous, use the non-emergency line rather than 911. What This Trend Really Means for Canadians The rise of gel blasters in Canada shows how quickly online trends can blur the line between harmless fun and real risk. What begins as a social challenge can escalate into a police call, a border seizure, or a medical emergency. The safest approach is to stay informed, avoid carrying realistic-looking toys in public, and think twice before joining viral challenges that can have serious consequences. Questions Canadians Are Asking About Gel Blasters Are gel blasters legal to own in Canada? Private ownership is not a crime, but importing, selling, or displaying one in public can be illegal if the device meets the definition of a replica firearm. Can I import a gel blaster from the U.S. or Asia? No. The Canada Border Services Agency classifies most as prohibited replicas and routinely seizes them at the border. What happens if police see me with a gel blaster? Police respond as if it were a real firearm until proven otherwise. You could face detention or criminal charges depending on the situation. Are Orbeez beads dangerous for children? Yes. Health Canada warns that water beads can expand inside the body if swallowed, leading to serious injury or death.

A small metal gadget is trending on TikTok for its crisp clicks and pocket size. It looks a bit like a sci-fi sidearm, which is why many viewers are asking if the fidget gun toy is legal to own in Canada. What the Fidget Gun Toy Actually Is This device is a mechanical fidget made from metal, usually aluminum or titanium. It does not fire a projectile and relies on springs or magnets to create a satisfying press and release. Designs vary from abstract to vaguely gun-shaped. The appeal is tactile relief and engineering novelty, not shooting. Check Price on Amazon What Canadian Law Says Under the Criminal Code, a replica firearm must look with near precision like a specific real make and model. Most fidget blasters are stylized, smaller and incapable of firing, so they generally do not meet that definition. Police still treat all gun reports as real until proven otherwise. Using any imitation to threaten or commit a crime is an offense. How CBSA Looks at Imports CBSA applies a three-part test that includes whether the item closely resembles an identifiable firearm model. These gadgets usually fail that resemblance step, which means they are typically admissible, case by case. Packaging and product pages that market the item as a realistic gun can invite extra scrutiny. Describing it accurately as a mechanical fidget toy reduces confusion. When a Legal Toy Can Still Cause Problems Public display can trigger 911 calls, especially on transit or near schools. Officers respond as if a weapon is real, which creates risk for everyone. Keep play private and low-profile. Context and perception matter more than intent. How to Avoid Issues in Canada Buy models with abstract or sci-fi styling rather than realistic proportions. Do not carry or use it in public spaces where it could be mistaken for a weapon. If importing, ensure invoices and listings call it a mechanical fidget toy. Keep magnet pieces away from children due to Health Canada safety rules. Bottom Line For Canadians For most designs, ownership and import are generally lawful because the devices are not replica firearms. The risk comes from public perception, so treat the gadget like something that could be misread and use it privately. If you choose to buy one, understand the difference between legal status and practical safety. A home desk toy can look very different in public. Legal compliance review This article avoids legal advice and reflects general federal rules in effect at the time of writing. CBSA and police make case-specific decisions, and laws can change, so readers should check official guidance before buying or importing.

When the Freedom Convoy rolled into Ottawa in early 2022, it started as a protest against vaccine mandates. Within days, it became a blockade that gridlocked parts of downtown Ottawa and disrupted daily life. Now, three years later, convoy organizers Tamara Lich and Chris Barber have been sentenced to 18-month conditional sentences for mischief and related offenses. Their punishment raises a new question — how does Canada balance protest rights with public safety when both matter to everyday people? Why Did Two Protest Leaders Avoid Jail Time in the Lich and Barber Sentencing? After a long and public trial, many Canadians expected a harsher outcome. The Crown sought multi-year prison terms, arguing the disruption caused significant harm and costs to residents and businesses. Instead, the judge handed down house arrest, curfews, and community service. The decision has left observers divided — some see restraint, others see leniency — and both sides are asking what justice looks like in a protest that changed the country’s capital. What Is a Conditional Sentence — and Why Does It Matter? House arrest may sound lenient, but under Canadian law, it counts as jail. Offenders serve their sentence at home under strict conditions that can send them to custody if breached. This approach applies to non-violent offenders who pose little risk to public safety. The Lich and Barber sentencing has brought new attention to this part of the justice system and how it balances accountability with rehabilitation. How Did the Convoy Impact Ordinary Canadians? For residents of downtown Ottawa, the protest meant sleepless nights, continuous horn noise, and blocked emergency routes. Businesses lost income, and many residents reported feeling unsafe walking home. City estimates later showed millions in municipal and policing costs. Those disruptions became central to how the court defined mischief — not as protest itself, but as harm caused by refusing to leave once the city’s order and injunctions were in place. When Does Protest Become a Threat to Safety? Freedom of expression is protected under Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but it’s not absolute. When demonstrations prevent others from working, accessing healthcare, or moving freely, they can cross into criminal territory. That balance remains fragile in every city. From environmental blockades to housing protests, Canadians continue to debate where protest ends and obstruction begins — a question the Lich and Barber case has forced courts to clarify. Why the Judge Drew the Line Where She Did Justice Heather Perkins-McVey rejected both the Crown’s call for years in prison and the defense’s request for full discharge. She concluded that jail wasn’t necessary but accountability was. Her reasoning relied on proportionality — the legal requirement that punishment must reflect both harm and intent. By imposing a conditional sentence, the court recognized the disruption’s seriousness without extending incarceration to first-time, non-violent offenders. What Each Side Says About the Lich Barber Sentencing Conservative-leaning commentators argue the Crown’s sentencing requests were excessive and say the court’s restraint confirms incarceration was unwarranted. Some frame the case as a test of political neutrality in the justice system. Liberal-leaning analysts highlight the convoy’s impact on Ottawa residents and emphasize that a conditional sentence is still a custodial term under Canadian law. Both sides agree the ruling will shape how courts treat disruptive but non-violent protests in the future — a question with growing relevance for cities like Vancouver. Could This Change How Future Protests Are Handled? The Lich and Barber sentencing sets a new benchmark for large-scale protests that disrupt daily life. It confirms that mischief convictions carry real consequences, even without jail time. For Vancouver and other Canadian cities, the case offers a framework. It reinforces that protest remains protected, but not at the expense of public safety or essential access for others. All Your Questions Answered Did Tamara Lich and Chris Barber go to jail? No. Both are serving conditional sentences at home with curfew and community service requirements. What does a conditional sentence mean in Canada? It is a custodial sentence served in the community under court supervision. Breaching conditions can lead to jail. Why did the judge choose house arrest instead of prison? Because neither organizer committed violence and both were found suitable for community-based sentencing. Can they appeal the decision? Yes. Both legal teams have stated they are reviewing the decision and may appeal. Will this affect future protests in Canada? It could. The case defines how far protests can go before being considered criminal mischief and may influence future court responses to public blockades. The Freedom Convoy case closed one chapter in a national debate over rights and responsibility. Its outcome won’t satisfy everyone, but it reminds Canadians what’s at stake when freedom and safety meet in the same street.

Interest rates in Canada are finally easing, but not fast enough to protect homeowners in Vancouver facing renewals in 2025. The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), the federal agency that monitors housing trends, says more Canadians are missing mortgage payments. It is a small change, but it could reshape Vancouver’s housing market as higher renewals lead to more payment stress, forced sales, and price corrections. Most Vancouver homeowners bought or refinanced when interest rates were near historic lows between 2020 and 2022. Now those mortgages are renewing at rates more than double what they were, even after this year’s small cuts. The average five-year fixed mortgage sits around 5 percent compared to 2 percent just a few years ago. That difference adds up fast, and CMHC warns the effects are only beginning to show. This is why experts say mortgage delinquency in Vancouver 2025 could become one of the most important economic stories to watch. Could This Push House Prices Down? Maybe — but not in the way buyers hope. When mortgage payments jump, some owners list early to stay ahead of renewal pressure, briefly increasing supply. Others hold off, hoping for deeper rate cuts before selling. This push-and-pull slows the market and creates pockets of opportunity rather than a city-wide price drop. CMHC data shows BC’s delinquency rate rising faster than before, though still below the national average. If more households struggle through 2025, forced sales could increase — particularly among condo and investment properties where profit margins are thin. It’s not a crash scenario, but it might finally give first-time buyers some leverage after years of record prices. Could Rising Mortgage Delinquency Push Vancouver House Prices Down in 2025? Maybe, but not dramatically. When payments rise, some homeowners list early to avoid financial strain, adding short bursts of new supply. Others wait, hoping for lower rates before selling. This back-and-forth can slow sales and flatten prices, but it rarely sparks a collapse. CMHC’s latest delinquency data shows British Columbia still below the national average, but the rate is climbing faster than before. If financial pressure spreads in 2025, more forced sales could appear, especially among condo investors or owners with smaller equity buffers. That could bring small price dips or temporary buyer leverage, not a full crash. Will Mortgage Renewals Force Vancouver Homeowners to Downsize in 2025? Many will adapt, but some are already running out of room. Those on variable or short fixed terms face what CMHC calls "payment shock" when their renewals jump to higher rates. The Bank of Canada lists this as one of the biggest financial risks for 2025. In high-cost areas like Metro Vancouver, even a slight increase can tip budgets over. Refinancing into longer terms or selling smaller homes is becoming more common. For growing families and first-time buyers who stretched to get in, downsizing may become a financial necessity rather than a choice. What Happens to Vancouver Mortgages if Rates Go Up or Down in 2025? If rates go down, monthly payments ease slightly, but not enough to erase the jump from pandemic lows. A homeowner renewing a 2 percent mortgage at 4.5 percent still faces a major increase. If rates stay flat, the squeeze spreads slowly. Renewals in 2025 and 2026 will continue pushing delinquencies higher as each household resets to higher payments. If rates rise again, mortgage stress could grow sharply. That might push more listings onto the market, softening prices but also leaving some households unable to refinance at all. How Rising Mortgage Delinquency Could Affect Renters in Vancouver Renters are not immune. When landlords renew their own mortgages at higher rates, they often raise rents where they can. In BC, annual increases are capped at 3.5 percent for 2025, but the rule does not apply when tenants move out, meaning new leases can be set at full market value. That means renters who stay put will see moderate increases, while anyone moving faces a jump. CMHC’s 2025 report shows the average purpose-built rental in Metro Vancouver costs about $2,400 a month. If mortgage stress causes more investors to sell or repurpose rental units, the city’s already tight supply could shrink even further. Why Vancouver Still Has One of Canada’s Lowest Mortgage Delinquency Rates Despite warning signs, Vancouver remains one of the most stable housing markets in Canada. Mortgage delinquency sits around 0.15 percent, below the national average of 0.21 percent. Strong job growth and steady immigration have helped households stay current. But this stability can be misleading. Many families rely on dual incomes or support from relatives to make ends meet. Regulators like CMHC and OSFI warn that BC’s high household debt leaves little buffer if the economy weakens or rates climb again. What Vancouver Buyers Should Watch in 2025’s Mortgage Renewal Cycle If you are waiting to buy, 2025 may offer selective openings rather than a full correction. Watch listings in Burnaby, Coquitlam, and Surrey, where condo investors are renewing early and some may sell under pressure. If rates keep falling, competition will return quickly as buyers re-enter the market. If they hold steady, prices could level off but remain high. And if rates rise again, more motivated sellers might appear, but with tighter lending rules, getting approved could still be difficult. The Bottom Line: What Vancouver’s 2025 Mortgage Renewal Storm Means for You Mortgage delinquency rates rarely make headlines, but they reveal how stable or fragile a housing market really is. For now, Vancouver looks steady, yet the coming renewal wave will be its toughest test since before the pandemic. Whether you are renting, buying, or holding on to your current home, keep an eye on what happens when those low-rate loans reset. That is where the next shift in Vancouver’s housing market will begin.