Frazier Institute You never see a bill when you leave a doctor’s office in Canada. No invoice. No tap of a credit card. But “free” isn’t really free. The Fraser Institute’s 2025 study shows a single worker earning $57,931 pays $5,703 a year in hidden healthcare taxes. That’s almost 10% of their income gone before rent, groceries, or gas. Couples and families are paying even more: Single worker:  $5,703 Single parent with one child:  $10,516 Couple without children:  $17,338 Family of four:  $19,060 For Vancouver workers already stretched by high housing and food costs, these hidden healthcare costs raise an important question: Are Canadians getting ripped off compared to other countries?  To find out, we’ll compare how much workers pay in the UK and Australia, and look at how wait times stack up across all three systems. What Is Canada’s Hidden Healthcare Bill? For a single worker, the annual cost is clear: $5,703 in taxes goes toward healthcare. For a family of four, it’s nearly $19,060. These amounts are built into your taxes, not listed on any receipt. And the bill keeps climbing. Since 1997, healthcare costs for the average Canadian family have grown: 2.2× faster than food 1.6× faster than shelter 1.6× faster than income Even when pay cheques rise, healthcare takes a bigger slice every year. Unlike groceries or rent, you don’t see it on the statement — it’s deducted before your money even hits the bank. Who Feels the Burden Most? The Fraser Institute’s income breakdown shows how the burden shifts. Lowest 10 percent of earners: pay about $726 a year, about 6 percent of income Middle 10 percent: pay $7,563 a year, about 9.3 percent of income Top 10 percent: pay $43,166 a year, about 9.6 percent of income While lower earners pay less in dollar terms, middle and higher income households shoulder far bigger totals. Close to 10 percent of their pay goes to healthcare. For a single Vancouver worker, the annual cost matches major expenses like food or transport. How Much Does the UK Pay for Healthcare? Average salary in London: about £50,000 Single worker pays: about £3,300 to £3,500 a year in taxes, or 6 to 7 percent of income The National Health Service (NHS) covers nearly all essential care. GP visits, hospital stays, and birth control are free at the point of use. Prescriptions cost £9.65 per item in England, but are free in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Out of pocket costs are lighter than in Canada, but patients face wait times that vary by region and procedure. How Much Does Australia Pay for Healthcare? Average salary in Melbourne: about AUD $78,000 Single worker pays: about AUD $6,800 to $7,000 a year, or about 9 percent of income Australia funds its Medicare system with general taxation and a 2 percent Medicare Levy that shows up directly on tax returns. On top of that, many Australians face gap fees of $40 to $60 when visiting a GP, since not all clinics bulk bill. Prescriptions are subsidised through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, but not free. Higher earners without private hospital insurance also face a surcharge of 1 to 1.5 percent of income. Australians are guaranteed coverage, but unlike Canadians they have a comparatively small charge compared to the whole cost of healthcare directly at the point of care. Wait Times: Canada vs the UK and Australia Paying thousands in hidden taxes would be easier to accept if care was fast. But Canada’s wait times are among the longest in the developed world. Type of Visit or Procedure Canada Australia UK Specialist appointment (1 month or more) About 61% of patients wait a month or longer Lower share, usually weeks not months Long waits common, many patients wait months for non urgent care Elective surgery average wait About 27 weeks from referral to treatment (2024 Fraser) About 48 days (national average for elective procedures) Multiple months depending on region and procedure For a single worker in Vancouver, that means paying $5,703 in hidden taxes and still waiting more than six months on average for treatment. In Australia, elective procedures move more quickly. In the UK, access varies, but wait times are shorter for many services than in Canada. Canada’s median health-care wait time hits 30 weeks—longest ever recorded Are We Getting Value for Money? Here is how the comparison shakes out for single workers: Canada, income $57,931: $5,703 a year, about 10 percent of income UK, income £50,000: £3,300 to £3,500 a year, about 6 to 7 percent of income Australia, income $78,000: $6,800 to $7,000 a year, about 9 percent of income Canada is not an outlier in percentage terms. But the difference lies in what you get. Canadians face longer waits than either the UK or Australia. Canadians also pay extra out of pocket for prescriptions, dental, and vision. Middle and higher income households in Canada see large absolute costs, approaching $20,000 for families. Final Thoughts: Hidden Healthcare Costs Vancouver The Fraser Institute’s conclusion is hard to ignore. Healthcare in Canada is not free. It is one of the biggest items on every pay cheque. With rising costs, gaps in coverage, and long waits, Canadians are right to ask whether they are really getting value for the money.

What We Know So Far False claim : 77-year-old Michael Mallinson of Toronto was falsely named online as the shooter. Confirmed suspect : Police have identified Tyler Robinson, 22, of Utah  as the man charged in Charlie Kirk’s killing. The incident : Kirk, 31, co-founder of Turning Point USA, was shot dead on Sept. 10 during an event at Utah Valley University. Fact checks : AFP, Al Jazeera, and Global News confirmed Mallinson had no involvement. Impact : Mallinson says he deleted his social media accounts after abusive messages. Canadian Misidentified as Charlie Kirk Shooter Toronto retiree Michael Mallinson, 77, was at home with his wife on September 10 when Charlie Kirk was shot in Utah. He says they had been running errands at Yorkdale Mall earlier in the day before returning home, where he took a nap. When he woke, his daughter was on the phone, panicked and telling him to delete his social media accounts. “I was quite alarmed,” Mallinson told CTV News. “You never want to have your name out and about.” Mallinson soon learned that an old photo of him, taken from a deleted X account, had been circulated online and tied to false claims that he was the shooter. The posts, some coming from impersonation accounts, spread rapidly and were shared thousands of times. The retiree, who spends his time rowing and working with patient advocacy groups for axial spondylarthritis, said the accusations left him shaken. He and his family began receiving abusive messages, including Facebook comments calling him “all sorts of names.” He told CTV News that while he initially hoped the rumor would fade, he feared for his safety once his photo became widely linked to the killing. “Ultimately, yes,” Mallinson said when asked if he felt in danger. “Once something is up on social media, it’s very hard to get rid of.” The ordeal forced him to deactivate his Facebook, Instagram, and Threads accounts, cutting him off from advocacy groups he had been part of. “I was pretty loathed to delete myself from Facebook and sever those relationships without being able to tell them why,” he added. Fact-Checking the Claims AFP Fact Check  called the accusations “entirely false.” Al Jazeera  documented how the false posts gained traction before being debunked. Global News  confirmed Mallinson’s alibi and interviewed him directly. A man who was in Toronto at the time of Charlie Kirk’s murder was misidentified as a suspect. (CTV News) Why It Matters Wrongful identifications after major crimes are not new, but they carry serious risks. The case of a Canadian misidentified as Charlie Kirk shooter shows how quickly false claims can spread before police release verified details. In the hours after Kirk’s killing, social media users circulated the name and photograph of Toronto retiree Michael Mallinson, presenting him as the gunman before authorities had confirmed a suspect. Fact-checkers later debunked the claim, and investigators have since arrested 22-year-old Tyler Robinson of Utah. For Mallinson, the impact was immediate. He told Canadian media he was “shocked and horrified” to wake up to messages accusing him of being a political assassin. He received abusive messages online, saw his photograph tied to false political narratives, and ultimately deleted his social media accounts out of concern for his safety and reputation. Experts say such cases illustrate a recurring pattern: in the gap before official information is released, misinformation spreads quickly and can permanently damage the lives of those wrongly named. The authorities in Utah were still searching Wednesday night for the person who killed Charlie Kirk.Credit ...Kim Raff for The New York Times Similar incidents have followed other high-profile crimes, such as the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, when innocent people were misidentified online, and the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, when false names circulated widely. Beyond individual harm, false identifications can also mislead the public and complicate investigations. Law enforcement officials warn that speculation distracts from credible leads, while false narratives continue to linger online long after they have been disproven. Wrongful identifications after major crimes are not new, but they carry serious risks. In the hours after Charlie Kirk’s killing, social media users circulated the name and photograph of Toronto retiree Michael Mallinson, presenting him as the gunman before police had confirmed a suspect. Fact-checkers later debunked the claim, and authorities have since arrested 22-year-old Tyler Robinson of Utah. For Mallinson, the impact was immediate. He told Canadian media he was “shocked and horrified” to wake up to messages accusing him of being a political assassin. He received abusive messages online, saw his photograph tied to false political narratives, and ultimately deleted his social media accounts out of concern for his safety and reputation. Experts say such cases illustrate a recurring pattern: in the gap before official information is released, misinformation spreads quickly and can permanently damage the lives of those wrongly named. Similar incidents have followed other high-profile crimes, such as the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, when innocent people were misidentified online, and the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, when false names circulated widely. Beyond individual harm, false identifications can also mislead the public and complicate investigations. Law enforcement officials warn that speculation distracts from credible leads, while false narratives continue to linger online long after they have been disproven. What’s Next With 22-year-old Tyler Robinson now in custody, investigators in Utah are continuing to gather evidence linking him to Charlie Kirk’s killing. Police have cited surveillance footage, digital messages, and a Mauser rifle recovered near the scene, but they have not released a full statement on his motive. Court proceedings in the months ahead are expected to clarify the timeline and Robinson’s intentions. For Michael Mallinson, the Canadian retiree wrongly named as the shooter, the focus is on moving past the false accusations. He has described receiving abusive messages and deleting his social media accounts after his photo and name circulated widely. He said he may consider suing people or websites who circulated the falsehood if the ordeal continued.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) has confirmed that major grocery chains misused “Product of Canada” labelling on imported food items during the recent U.S.-Canada trade dispute. Between November 2024 and September 2025, the agency investigated 167 complaints about false or misleading country-of-origin claims, finding dozens of cases where imported goods were incorrectly marketed as Canadian. Rise in Complaints About “Product of Canada” Labelling Over the past year, complaints about country-of-origin claims in Canadian grocery stores climbed sharply. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency logged 167 cases between November 2024 and September 2025, most of them during the months when tariffs on U.S. goods were in effect. By early September, inspectors had reviewed 137 of the complaints. Nearly half of those investigations confirmed that imported items had been mislabelled as Canadian. Canadian Food Inspection Agency FIA Investigation: Dozens of Cases Confirmed The Canadian Food Inspection Agency said 45 grocery stores were linked to the confirmed cases of mislabelling. Forty-two of the stores were flagged once, while three received two complaints each. In every instance, investigators determined the stores had incorrectly labelled imported food as Canadian. The agency did not disclose which companies were involved. Although the CFIA has authority to fine grocers up to $15,000 per offence, no financial penalties were issued. Instead, the agency required corrective action in every case of non-compliance. Measures included reviewing retail labelling processes, issuing reminder letters about regulatory requirements, raising staff awareness about the importance of accurate labelling, and following up to confirm changes had been made. Why Tariffs Fueled the Labelling Controversy The rise in mislabelling complaints coincided with Canada’s trade dispute with the United States. During the tariff period, tens of thousands of Canadians signed petitions urging grocery chains to promote domestic products. Major retailers, including Loblaw, Sobeys and Metro, responded by pledging to highlight Canadian goods with maple leaf symbols and “Made in Canada” tags. At the same time, shoppers began reporting instances of imported items displayed under Canadian labels, raising doubts about the accuracy of the promotions. The CFIA’s findings confirmed that some of those complaints were valid, adding scrutiny to retailers already under pressure over food prices and supply chain costs. What the Rules Say: Product of Canada vs. Made in Canada Under CFIA guidelines, the terms “Product of Canada” and “Made in Canada” have specific meanings. “Product of Canada” can only be used when virtually all major ingredients, processing, and labour originate in Canada. “Made in Canada,” by contrast, may appear on items containing imported ingredients if the last substantial transformation occurred domestically. Consumer advocates have long argued that the rules can be confusing, especially when promotions or store labels feature maple leaf symbols without context.  Loblaw Companies president and chief executive Per Bank welcomed the removal of tariffs in a recent statement, saying prices would “come down over time, as we sell through inventory that was purchased based on tariffed pricing.” The CFIA said all implicated stores corrected their practices. Still, the episode highlighted how sensitive origin claims have become for Canadians trying to track where their food comes from. Final Thoughts Canada lifted its retaliatory tariffs on American goods on September 1, ending nearly a year of heightened trade tensions. For the CFIA, the mislabelling cases underscored the importance of clear standards on country-of-origin claims. While no fines were issued, the agency said corrective actions were taken in every case of non-compliance. For consumers, the investigation reinforced the need to look closely at labels, as debates over what qualifies as a “Product of Canada” remain central to how food is marketed in grocery stores.

A police officer in Sooke, B.C., on April 14, 2022. (CTV News) Sooke Teen Assault RCMP Arrests Seven Youths The Sooke RCMP confirmed that seven teenagers were arrested following the July 2, 2025 assault near the 6600 block of Goodmere Road. The Sooke teen assault RCMP arrests came after investigators determined the incident involved a group of youths attacking another youth, with the assault later recorded and shared on social media. On July 3, the victim’s family contacted police to report the attack. Evidence gathered during the investigation led officers to identify the seven suspects, and warrants for their arrests were issued. All of the teens have since been taken into custody and are facing criminal charges. Timeline of the Sooke Assault Investigators said they were contacted by the victim’s family on July 3. Evidence gathered in the case led police to identify seven youths as participants in the assault. Warrants were obtained, and all seven suspects have since been arrested. Staff Sergeant Greg Willcocks, the detachment commander for Sooke RCMP, acknowledged concerns in the community after one of the arrests took place near school grounds. “We are taking the allegations of this assault very seriously,” he said in a statement. Youth Criminal Justice Act Because all of the suspects are under 18, their identities are protected under the federal Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA). The legislation prohibits the release of names or other details that could identify youth accused of crimes. As a result, police did not provide further information about the seven arrested teens, including their ages or the specific charges they may face. Public Information Sooke RCMP is asking anyone with information about the incident to contact the detachment at 250-642-5241. Corporal Alex Bérubé, District Advisory NCO for BC RCMP Island District, is the media contact for the case. He can be reached at 250-380-6110 or by email at alex.berube@rcmp-grc.gc.ca .

Members of the Vancouver Police forensics team examine a victim's phone while investigating the scene where a vehicle drove into crowd at a street festival Saturday evening in Vancouver, Sunday, April 27, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Rich Lam The suspect in the Vancouver Lapu Lapu Day festival attack  has been declared mentally fit to stand trial. Adam Kai-Ji Lo now faces 42 charges, including 11 counts of second-degree murder and 31 counts of attempted murder, after the April 26 SUV assault that left 11 people dead and dozens injured. Vancouver Lapu Lapu Day Festival Attack: What Happened on April 26 The attack took place during evening celebrations along Fraser Street, where hundreds had gathered for the annual festival. An SUV plowed into the crowd, killing 11 people and injuring dozens more. Witnesses described scenes of panic as emergency crews and bystanders rushed to help victims. Flowers and memorials were placed along Fraser Street in the days that followed, marking what Mayor Ken Sim later called “the darkest day in the history of Vancouver.” Adam Kai-Ji Lo Ruled Fit to Stand Trial At a provincial court hearing in Vancouver, Judge Reginald P. Harris ruled that Adam Kai-Ji Lo is mentally fit to stand trial. The decision followed a fitness hearing in July where two forensic psychiatrists were called as expert witnesses before legal arguments were presented by Crown prosecutor Michaela Donnelly and defence lawyer Mark Swartz. In his ruling, Harris said Lo understands the nature and consequences of the proceedings, can communicate with his lawyer, and is able to conduct his defence. The judge also ordered Lo be detained in hospital while awaiting trial. Because of a publication ban, the specific evidence and testimony that led to the ruling cannot be reported, though the outcome itself is public. A media consortium, including The Canadian Press, is challenging the scope of the ban, with a ruling expected later this week. New Charges Laid: Murder and Attempted Murder Counts Prosecutors confirmed that Adam Kai-Ji Lo now faces a total of 42 criminal charges. In addition to the 11 counts of second-degree murder filed shortly after the incident, the B.C. Prosecution Service has added 31 charges of attempted murder, each tied to surviving victims of the April 26 attack. Vancouver Police Chief Const. Steve Rai called the decision “another step toward answers and accountability in one of the most horrific incidents our city has ever faced.” He praised investigators for their work on what he described as a mass-casualty case that has tested the department’s resources and resolve. Police said the expanded list of charges reflects the scope of the tragedy and ensures every victim is represented in court proceedings. Community Reaction to the Vancouver Lapu Lapu Day Tragedy Outside provincial court, Kristina Corpin-Moser of Filipino B.C. said the ruling brings mixed emotions for the community. While there is relief that the case will proceed to trial, she noted it also signals the beginning of a long and difficult process for survivors and families of victims. Mayor Ken Sim called April 26 “the darkest day in the history of Vancouver” and said he is encouraged to see the case moving forward. “It is good to know that the victims, their families and the surrounding community will have the chance to receive justice,” he said in a statement. Community members have continued to hold memorials along Fraser Street, with flowers and messages left at the scene. Advocacy groups say many residents remain focused on healing and supporting one another as the trial approaches. Public Safety Review After Vancouver Festival Attack In the aftermath of the tragedy, the City of Vancouver launched a review of safety measures for large public gatherings. The final report, released in early September, concluded that planning for the Lapu Lapu Day festival had followed required protocols, including a risk assessment that deemed the likelihood of a major incident low. Despite this finding, the review outlined new recommendations aimed at preventing similar attacks. Among the proposals were stronger vehicle barriers at festival sites, revised traffic control plans, and closer coordination between event organizers and law enforcement. Mayor Ken Sim said the recommendations are an important step toward restoring public confidence. “We must ensure that when residents gather to celebrate, they feel safe,” he said. City officials are now considering whether permanent vehicle barriers should be installed in high-traffic festival areas. What Comes Next in the Vancouver Lapu Lapu Day Festival Case With 42 charges now before the court, the trial of Adam Kai-Ji Lo is expected to be lengthy and closely watched. A publication ban continues to restrict details of the psychiatric evidence presented during the fitness hearing, though media organizations are challenging the scope of the order. For families and survivors, the legal process represents both a path to accountability and a reminder of the April 26 tragedy. City officials say the case, along with the safety review, will shape how Vancouver manages public festivals in the years ahead.

You pick up a mascara or perfume in Seattle, the same one you’ve seen on shelves in Vancouver. The packaging looks identical. But what’s inside may not be. Canada and the United States follow different rules for cosmetics. Health Canada enforces a “Hotlist” of banned or restricted chemicals, while the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not require pre-market approval for most products and has no central banned list. That split means a fragrance or nail polish bought legally in an American store can contain ingredients that regulators in Canada have already prohibited for safety reasons. Why Canada and the U.S. Treat Cosmetics Differently Canada’s cosmetic rules are built around prevention. Health Canada updates its Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist regularly, giving companies a clear list of substances they cannot use. The U.S. system developed differently. The Food and Drug Administration does not review most cosmetics before they are sold, and there is no centralized banned list. Instead, responsibility often falls to the courts, state governments, or recalls after a product is already on the market. For consumers, that means Canada emphasizes blocking high-risk ingredients up front, while the U.S. relies more on catching problems later. That means a mascara sold legally in the U.S. may not meet Canadian requirements. 6 Chemicals Banned in Canadian Cosmetics but Still Allowed in the U.S. 1. Phthalates (DEP, DBP, DEHP) Phthalates are chemicals used to make nail polish flexible and fragrances last longer. They are manufactured by reacting phthalic anhydride with alcohols and are common in perfumes, sprays, and nail products. Health Canada prohibits DEHP in cosmetics because of evidence of reproductive and developmental risks. In the U.S., phthalates are not federally banned in cosmetics, meaning certain products sold in American stores may still contain them, while Canadian versions must comply with stricter rules. 2. Formaldehyde and Methylene Glycol Formaldehyde, or its liquid form methylene glycol, can be present in hair-smoothing treatments and some nail hardeners. It can also be released in small amounts from preservatives such as DMDM hydantoin in shampoos and lotions. Health Canada prohibits formaldehyde and methylene glycol in most cosmetics, allowing only limited use in nail hardeners with warning labels. The FDA has not imposed a broad federal ban, though a proposed rule would restrict use in hair straighteners. This difference means certain products may be marketed in the U.S. that would not be permitted in Canada. 3. Mercury in Skin-Lightening and Eye Products Mercury compounds have historically been used in skin-lightening creams and some eye-area products. Exposure to mercury has been associated with kidney and neurological effects. Mercury is prohibited in all cosmetics in Canada. In the U.S., up to 65 ppm is still technically allowed in eye-area products if no safer alternative is available, although the FDA has stated that no such products are currently marketed. 4. Benzene (Contaminant) Benzene is a petroleum-derived solvent that has been associated in studies with blood disorders and cancers. It is not added intentionally to cosmetics but has occasionally been detected as a contaminant in aerosol products such as dry shampoos and sunscreens. Benzene is listed on Health Canada’s Hotlist as prohibited in cosmetics. In the U.S., there is no explicit federal ban in cosmetics, and recalls are issued only if testing shows unacceptable levels. 5. Fragrance Allergens Fragrance mixtures can contain dozens of chemicals, including allergens such as limonene and linalool. These are used widely in perfumes, shampoos, lotions, and soaps. Canada has adopted new rules requiring more than 80 fragrance allergens to be listed on cosmetic labels by 2028. In the U.S., labels are not yet required to disclose these allergens individually and may only list “fragrance” as a generic term. 6. Talc (Asbestos Risk) Talc is a mineral used in powders, blushes, and pressed makeup for its absorbent and silky texture. Concerns arise because natural talc deposits can be contaminated with asbestos, a known carcinogen. Health Canada has assessed talc as a potential health risk and is moving toward tighter restrictions. In the U.S., talc remains permitted in cosmetics, though the FDA has proposed new testing standards to monitor for asbestos contamination. Screenshot the Chemicals Banned in Canadian Cosmetics staysafevancouver.com Why the Rules on Chemicals Banned in Canadian Cosmetics Differ From the U.S. Both countries look at scientific evidence, but they act on it in different ways. Canada often applies a precautionary approach. If there is credible evidence a chemical may pose a risk, restrictions or bans are put in place sooner. The U.S. typically waits for stronger, long-term proof before acting, which means some ingredients remain legal there for longer. Legal frameworks also differ. In the U.S., cosmetics law has historically given manufacturers more freedom and fewer pre-market checks, while Canada requires ingredient notification and maintains an active Hotlist. Industry influence plays a role as well. The U.S. market is larger and lobbying pressure is stronger, which can slow down regulatory changes. Canada has generally leaned more toward risk aversion and consumer protection in its cosmetic safety decisions. What This Means for Shoppers The same brand may sell different versions of a product depending on the country. Products marketed in Canada are required to comply with Health Canada’s rules, while U.S. formulations may include ingredients that are restricted here. For consumers, the key point is that Canada applies a more precautionary approach. When buying products online or from U.S. retailers, it is possible to purchase cosmetics that would not meet Canadian requirements. How Consumers Can Make Informed Choices Read labels : Ingredient lists can help identify substances of concern, such as formaldehyde-releasing preservatives. Purchase from Canadian retailers : Products marketed in Canada must follow Health Canada’s Hotlist and labeling rules. Check recalls : Both Health Canada and the FDA maintain online recall lists for cosmetics. Look for voluntary claims : Labels such as “phthalate-free” or “fragrance-free” are sometimes used by brands to market transparency. FAQ: Chemicals Banned in Canadian Cosmetics vs the U.S. Are parabens banned in Canada? No. Parabens are still allowed in Canadian cosmetics, though Health Canada monitors their safety. What cosmetic ingredients are banned in Canada? Canada prohibits ingredients such as DEHP (a phthalate), mercury, formaldehyde, benzene, and is reviewing talc and PFAS. What cosmetic ingredients are banned in the U.S.? The U.S. bans relatively few cosmetic ingredients, mainly mercury above 65 ppm and certain unapproved color additives. Can American makeup be sold in Canada? Yes, but products sold in Canada must comply with Health Canada’s Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist and related regulations. Why are some beauty products banned in Canada but not the U.S.? Canada maintains a precautionary Hotlist that restricts more chemicals, while U.S. oversight allows most ingredients unless later deemed unsafe. Is talc banned in Canada? No. Talc is not yet banned, but Health Canada has flagged it as a potential risk and is considering restrictions. Are PFAS banned in Canadian cosmetics? Not yet. Canada is reviewing PFAS as a class, while certain U.S. states such as California have already enacted bans. Is Sephora makeup the same in Canada and the U.S.? Not always. Brands may reformulate products to meet Canadian requirements, so ingredient lists can differ between countries. Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only. It is based on publicly available information from Health Canada, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and related regulatory sources. It is not intended as legal or medical advice. For specific concerns about cosmetics safety or compliance, consult official government resources or a qualified professional.

Are you worried about being physically overpowered? Wondering whether it’s legal to carry a taser or stun gun in Canada for self-defense? Let’s look into your rights as a person defending themselves against an attacker and the laws that you’re up against. Quick Answers 10 Alternatives To Stun Guns For Self Defense Are Stun Guns Legal In Canada? Are Tasers Legal In Canada? Zap the Confusion: Difference Between Stun Guns & Tasers What Hurts More, a Stun Gun or Taser? Are Stun Guns or Tasers Lethal? Do Stun Guns Go Through Clothes? Do Stun Guns Look The Same As Tasers? Are Tasers Legal? Difference Between A Stun Gun vs Taser In Canada, tasers are illegal for civilians to carry as self-defense weapons and are classified as "prohibited weapons." Tasers can only be used by law enforcement for self-defense and crowd control because there are many concerns about the potential harm they can cause when they’re used improperly. Canadian law enforcement have strict guidelines and training programs in place for using tasers. The RCMP have to re-certify every year to continue carrying a “conducted energy weapon. ” Sometimes the term “stun gun” and “taser” gets used interchangeably because they’re both conducted-energy weapons, but let’s break down the many differences. “ Taser ” is actually the brand name for the weapons now made by Axon. This electro-shock weapon fires tiny probes or darts that are connected to thin wires, causing neuromuscular incapacitation. This pistol-looking device is intended to be used for personal protection because they can reach targets up to 15 feet away, and the probes can emit multiple cycles of electricity of around 50,000 volts. The target is struck by the darts, which deliver electricity through the wires, disrupting the neuromuscular system and rendering the target temporarily paralyzed or if overused, potentially rendering them unconscious. The taser causes muscles to contract up to 19 times per second. Stun guns are for close range combat and have metal prongs at the top of the device. They are block-shaped like an electric shaver, but you can find them concealed in the form of a torch, phone or flashlight. They give the attacker a very painful, high-voltage shock - the pain is temporary but it does not paralyze the entire body like a taser does. At approximately three milliamps, the charge is not strong enough to damage the target’s body unless you hold down the weapon for an excessively long period of time. Officers are trained to use all energy-conducting weapons are only supposed to use them when a person is “causing, or may soon cause, themselves or someone else harm.” Are Stun Guns or Tasers Legal In Canada? You may be tempted to carry one in your handbag, but personal stun guns are illegal in Canada, and if you possess one, this is considered a criminal offense and possession of a weapon. Canada categorizes weapons into “prohibited” and “unprohibited weapons.” And both stun guns and tasers are considered prohibited weapons. Stun guns can only be used by police officers who use them as a non-lethal alternative to firearms. The RCMP are permitted to use stun guns in situations where they feel under threat (according to the Canadian Criminal Code Section 85) and where all other options have been exhausted. This includes verbal communication and empty-hand control techniques, which is a fancy way of saying all techniques that don’t involve any kind of weapon. So, What About Cattle Prods? Cattle prods are legal stun guns, as long as they are used only for the purpose of a deterrent against animals and are over a length of 480mm. Cattle prods must be used for cattle, to deter dog attacks and so on. It is illegal to use them on a person, or intended to be used on a person, as then they become a prohibited weapon in accordance with the Criminal Code of Canada. 10 Alternatives To Stun Guns You can read my comprehensive guide on the 10 best self defense tools you can carry, but I've given you a quick rundown below as well. Dog Spray Tactical Pen Personal Safety Alarms Security Umbrellas Diversion Water bottle Self-Defense Keychains Flashlights Apple AirTag GPS Watches with Safety Features Safety whistles 1. Dog Spray In Canada, it's illegal to tell a policeman that you're carrying pepper spray for self-defense. But, you can carry dog spray  to use against dogs, wildlife and (ahem) animals. Read our full guide on whether bear spray for self defense in Canada here . 2. Tactical Pen If you’re trapped in a car, you can break glass with a Tactical Pen (otherwise known as a windshield breaker). But it's illegal to carry this if you intend to use it as a weapon in Canada, so remember - you will only be carrying this on your person because it's a normal pen . For writing with ... for your exam. Read my full guide on the 10 best tactical pens here . 3. Personal Safety Alarms Personal alarms  let an extremely loud noise to draw attention to your situation and deter and disorient attackers. 4. Security Umbrellas City Safe Self Defense Umbrella A security umbrella , on the surface, appears and functions like any regular umbrella, offering the typical utility you'd expect. However, it's engineered with a robust frame and a steel tip for a forceful defensive response. 5. Diversion Water Bottle Hide your cash, cards, keys and those little treasures you don't want the world to find. And here's the best part: If needed, when filled with ice, it can serve as a makeshift defense tool. This bottle offers a smart, subtle way to keep your valuables secure while staying hydrated. 6. Self-defense keychains Self-defense keychains are compact, easy-to-carry devices designed for personal protection, either by striking an assailant or creating noise to draw attention. 7. Tactical Flashlights Your every day flashlight can be used as self-defense tool by shining it in an attacker's eyes to blind and disorient them. Flashlights are of course legal to carry in Canada, unlike many other self-defense tools. This means that you can have one on hand at all times in your bag without worrying about breaking the law. 8. Apple AirTag Although Apple’s AirTag is primarily designed to track personal items, it can also play a role in enhancing your personal safety. By discreetly placing an AirTag in your bag or attaching it to your keychain, you establish a covert connection between yourself and those closest to you. Your friends and family can then use the Find My app to effortlessly monitor your location while you're commuting or out for a jog. 9. GPS Watch GPS watches  are your guardian angel. A fusion of fitness and protection, they're the jogger's trusted companion as they track your location real-time. Fitbit Versa 4 Fitness Smart Watch 10. Safety whistles Safety whistles  in Canada is completely lawful. You can conveniently wear it around your neck or stash it in a handbag or pocket for easy access in case of emergencies. What Hurts More, a Stun Gun or Taser? A taser and a stun gun are similar in terms of the pain they cause to the attacker, but the taser has a greater ability to disrupt muscle movements and prevent an assailant from advancing towards you by paralyzing them. The effects of a taser last less than one hour. Stun gun effects are temporary and end once you stop pressing down the stun gun onto the attacker. Using the stun gun for ½ a second causes a moment of pain. Zapping one to two seconds causes muscle spasms and confusion. A zap that’s longer than three seconds disorients and causes great temporary pain to the attacker. Are Stun Guns Or Tasers Lethal? A taser shock can cause “cardiac arrest” and death, according to a 2012 study . Tasers can impair brain function such as causing reduced verbal learning and memory, but these effects last under an hour. The effects lasted, on average, less than one hour. A stun gun is not lethal but causes a significant amount of pain. There is no permanent damage from a stun gun. Do Stun Guns Go Through Clothes? Stun guns can penetrate clothing due to the high voltage electric shock placed directly on the attacker's body, but very heavy clothing (like thick jackets) will reduce the shock’s effectiveness. Does a Stun Gun Look The Same As A Taser? Tasers are pistol-shaped, whereas stun guns are small, handheld devices often found in the form of a torch. What Can I Carry As Self Defense? In Canada it's illegal to carry any weapon with the intention of self-defense. However, if you intend to (and just happen to) be carrying bear spray and you just happen to use it if you get attacked by another person, You can read the full guide on pepper spray and bear spray here for more info . Related articles: 5 Best Self-Defense Umbrellas 10 Best Self-Defense Gifts For Her 5 Best Tactical Flashlights For Self-Defense 10 Best Tactical Pens On Amazon (Canada Edition)

24-year-old Taran Pandher, left, and 34-year-old Shahaib Abasi were gunned down in separate incidents nearly a week apart this month, but RCMP say both deaths were connected to the ongoing B.C. gang conflict. Photo by RCMP /PNG Two men known to police were shot dead in separate attacks in Langley and Burnaby less than a week apart. Investigators say the killings of 24-year-old Taran Pandher and 34-year-old Shahaib Abasi are connected to the ongoing B.C. gang conflict. Both murders were followed by burning vehicles, a hallmark of Metro Vancouver gang hits, and the homicide team is now appealing for witnesses and dashcam footage. Taxi Shooting in Langley On September 5, 2025, just before 10:30 p.m., Langley RCMP found Taran Pandher shot inside a taxi near 200 Street and 53 Avenue. Efforts to save him were unsuccessful. Roughly 30 minutes later, a vehicle was found burning near 132 Street and 64A Avenue in Surrey. Investigators believe it was connected to the killing. IHIT confirmed the homicide was targeted. Pandher was known to police. Burnaby Attack Outside McDonald’s On September 10, 2025, just before 5:30 p.m., Shahaib Abasi was fatally shot outside a McDonald’s near Still Creek Avenue and Still Creek Drive in Burnaby. About 15 minutes later, a white Mitsubishi RVR was discovered burning near Nursery Street and Lakefield Drive. Police are working to confirm its role in the attack. Abasi, a Surrey resident, had also been the subject of previous police attention. In May, officers stopped his Tesla and seized $45,000 in cash, bear mace, and two cellphones. The money later tested positive for traces of several illicit drugs and is now under civil forfeiture. IHIT says the Burnaby killing was also targeted and connected to the gang conflict. Pattern of Gang-Related Violence Both cases share common elements of Metro Vancouver gang violence: Victims known to police Shootings carried out in public Vehicles set on fire shortly after the attacks “The gang landscape is complex and fluid,” said IHIT Cpl. Sukhi Dhesi. “Those responsible showed a complete disregard for public safety.” Police Appeal for Witnesses IHIT is asking the public for dashcam or CCTV footage from the following areas on September 5, 2025: 20200 block of 53A Avenue, Langley, 9–11 p.m. 13250 block of 64A Avenue, Surrey, 10:30–11:30 p.m. 19900 block of 53 Avenue, Langley, 10–11 p.m. Anyone with information about the Burnaby or Langley shootings is asked to call 1-877-551-IHIT (4448)  or email ihitinfo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca .

Forensics investigators are seen at a residential building on Sept. 7, two days after the triple stabbing. (Dillon Hodgin/ CBC ) The lone survivor of the Sept 5 triple stabbing in East Vancouver has died in hospital, Vancouver police said Monday. Jinfeng Guan, 50, died Thursday. Police said they have notified Crown counsel and are submitting evidence for consideration of additional charges. Viet Quy John Ly, 54, was charged Sept 7 with two counts of second degree murder and one count of aggravated assault , and he remains in custody. Timeline Of East Vancouver Triple Stabbing: Sept 5 to now Sept 5: Police respond shortly before 2 p.m. to a stabbing call in Joyce-Collingwood. A 50-year-old woman is found with life-threatening injuries near Vanness Avenue and Spencer Street, and two women are found deceased in another building near Joyce Street and Vanness Avenue. Sept 6 +7: Vancouver police arrest a 54-year-old man and the B.C. Prosecution Service later approves two counts of second degree murder and one count of aggravated assault against Viet Quy John Ly, 54. Sept 11: The surviving victim, identified as Jinfeng Guan, 50, dies in hospital. Sept 15: Vancouver police announce Guan’s death and say evidence is being submitted to Crown counsel for consideration of additional charges. Sept 17: Canadian Press reporting notes interim bail was denied and the next Vancouver Provincial Court appearance is set for Sept 26. An apartment building at 3264 Vanness Ave. in Vancouver that was the site of a double homicide on Sept. 5. (Credit: Jason Payne) Who The Victims Are & The Accused Police identified the deceased victims as Jianghui Deng, 55, and Chunxiu Yin, 54. They were found in a residential building near Joyce Street and Vanness Avenue on Sept 5. Jinfeng Guan, 50, was found with life-threatening injuries in a separate building about two blocks away near Vanness Avenue and Spencer Street. She died in hospital on Sept 11. The accused is Viet Quy John Ly, 54. He was charged on Sept 7 with two counts of second degree murder and one count of aggravated assault, and remains in custody. Police say they have submitted evidence to Crown counsel to consider additional charges following Guan’s death. No additional or amended charges had been posted publicly as of Sept 17. Current Charges: What Could Change? Viet Quy John Ly is charged with two counts of second degree murder and one count of aggravated assault. Police say they have submitted evidence to Crown counsel to consider additional charges following Jinfeng Guan’s death. What Second Degree Murder Means in Canada All murder that is not first degree is classified as second degree under the Criminal Code. A conviction for first or second degree murder carries a mandatory life sentence. What Does Aggravated Assault Mean? Aggravated assault is defined as wounding, maiming, disfiguring, or endangering the life of the complainant, with a maximum penalty of 14 years. After a victim dies - how charges may be reassessed Crown prosecutors apply a two part test for charge approval and continue to reassess that test throughout a prosecution. New evidence, including a victim’s death, can lead Crown to amend or add charges if the evidentiary and public interest standards are met. East Vancouver Triple Stabbing: What Happens Next in Court Custody status and next date Viet Quy John Ly remains in custody after interim bail was denied . His next appearance is set for Sept 26 at Vancouver Provincial Court. How to check daily court lists BC posts daily court lists each morning that show scheduled appearances by accused name. You can search the provincial Daily Court Lists and Court Services Online on the morning of the hearing. If you need help now VictimLinkBC offers 24-7 confidential support and referrals for victims and witnesses in B.C. Call 911 if you are in immediate danger, or use the VPD non-emergency line for non-urgent reports. Stay safe. Related reading: Surrey Bear Creek Park Shooting Canada’s Most Dangerous Cities Two Fatal Shootings in Burnaby & Langley Tied to Gang Violence

When personal safety is on the line, lethal force isn’t always an option—but neither is being defenseless. That’s where Byrna non-lethal self-defense launchers come in. Unlike traditional firearms, Byrna launchers fire CO₂-powered kinetic, chemical, and pepper rounds to stop threats without the legal risks of a firearm. But not all Byrna launchers are built the same. Some pack more power, some are compact for everyday carry, and others are budget-friendly for home defense. In this guide, we break down the Byrna LE vs SD vs Mission 4 vs SE, what they do, and which one gives you the protection you need. What is a Byrna Self-Defense Launcher? A Byrna self-defense launcher is a CO₂-powered, non-lethal device designed to stop threats without deadly force. Unlike traditional firearms, Byrna launchers fire kinetic impact rounds, chemical irritants (like pepper spray), and tear gas projectiles to deter and incapacitate attackers from a safe distance. These launchers are commonly used for home defense, personal safety, and law enforcement training, offering a safe alternative to firearms while still delivering stopping power comparable to traditional self-defense tools. Byrna Le vs SD: Different Byrna Launchers Explained Byrna offers several models of launchers, each designed for different self-defense and law enforcement needs. While they share the same CO₂-powered system, projectile compatibility, and purpose, they have key differences in performance, features, and intended use. Feature Byrna Mission 4 Byrna TCR Byrna LE Byrna SD Magazine Capacity 19+19 rounds (38 total) 12+7 rounds (19 total) 8 rounds 5 rounds Muzzle Velocity 325 FPS 295 FPS 330 FPS 300 FPS Effective Range 100 feet 60 feet 60 feet 50 feet CO₂ Cartridge 88g (high capacity) 12g 8g 8g Best For Home defense, security, property protection Tactical training, security teams EDC defense, duty use Compact carry, personal defense The Mission 4  is the most powerful Byrna launcher available, offering the best stopping power, accuracy, and shot capacity. Here are all the models explained below: 1. Byrna SD (Self Defense) The Byrna SD (formerly Byrna HD) is the most popular model and a go-to choice for civilians looking for a compact, reliable self-defense launcher. Fires up to 60 feet with kinetic or chemical projectiles Semi-automatic firing with a 5-round magazine No permit required in most U.S. states Compatible with Byrna MAX, Kinetic, and Pepper rounds This model is perfect for home defense, personal carry, and travel, offering a balance of power and ease of use. 2. Byrna LE (Law Enforcement) The Byrna LE is the most advanced model in Byrna’s lineup, designed for law enforcement professionals and serious self-defense users. Higher muzzle velocity than the SD (up to 340 FPS vs. 300 FPS) Increased accuracy and range with a more refined trigger pull Improved grip and ergonomics for faster handling Still a non-lethal alternative, but with more force behind each shot For users who want the most power and accuracy, the Byrna LE is the best choice. 3.  Byrna Mission 4 Unlike the Byrna SD or LE, which are compact pistol-style launchers, the Mission 4 is a full-sized rifle designed for maximum effectiveness. Byrna’s most powerful and high-capacity launcher 19+19 round magazines (38 total) 100-foot effective range Best for home and property defense 4. Byrna TCR (Tactical Compact Rifle) For those looking for a home defense solution with more tactical capability, the Byrna TCR offers: Larger capacity magazines for extended engagement Carbine-style ergonomics for greater stability and control Upgraded CO₂ system for more consistent shot performance This model is best for homeowners, security professionals, and those who want a more intimidating presence for deterring intruders. How Does a Byrna Self-Defense Launcher Work? Unlike traditional firearms that rely on gunpowder and bullets, Byrna launchers use compressed CO₂ cartridges to fire projectiles. These projectiles can be kinetic impact rounds, chemical irritant rounds, or training rounds, giving users flexibility in how they defend themselves. The Mechanics of a Byrna Launcher A Byrna launcher operates similarly to a semi-automatic pistol, but instead of firing bullets, it uses .68 caliber projectiles powered by a CO₂ cartridge. Here’s how it works: 1️⃣ Load a CO₂ Cartridge – Byrna launchers use 8-gram CO₂ cartridges that provide consistent shot power. Once punctured, a single cartridge can fire 15-25 rounds, depending on the model. 2️⃣ Insert a Magazine – Magazines hold 5 to 7 rounds, depending on the model. Users can load kinetic, pepper, or training rounds depending on the situation. 3️⃣ Pull the Trigger – When fired, the CO₂ gas rapidly expands, propelling the projectile at speeds of 220-340 feet per second (FPS). Higher FPS means more impact force. 4️⃣ Projectile Impact – The round strikes the target, either causing a painful kinetic impact or releasing a chemical irritant to incapacitate the attacker. 5️⃣ Reload & Repeat – Users can quickly reload spare magazines or swap CO₂ cartridges for continuous self-defense capability. Types of Byrna Self-Defense Rounds Byrna launchers stand out because they fire a variety of non-lethal ammunition. Different projectiles offer unique tactical advantages depending on the situation. 🟠 Kinetic Rounds – Impact-Only, No Chemicals Solid plastic balls designed to cause painful blunt-force impact Effective for stopping an attacker without the use of chemicals Legal for self-defense even in areas where chemical rounds are restricted 🔴 Byrna MAX Projectiles - A powerful gas & pepper spray combo A combination of OC (Oleoresin Capsicum) pepper spray and CS tear gas Causes instant burning in the eyes, nose, and lungs Effects last 15-30 minutes, giving users time to escape 🟢 Byrna Pepper Rounds – Strong but Legal in More States Contains only OC pepper irritant without CS tear gas Legal in some areas where Byrna MAX rounds are restricted Provides temporary blindness, breathing difficulty, and disorientation 🔵 Byrna Eco-Kinetic Rounds – Training & Practice Biodegradable projectiles for safe outdoor training Lower cost per round, making them ideal for practice No chemical irritants, but still deliver a small impact 🏠 Byrna Pro Training Rounds – Inert & Reusable Identical in weight and size to live rounds but contain no chemicals Used for realistic self-defense training without cleanup Perfect for practice drills and learning proper aim Which Byrna Round is Right for You? 🔹 Home defense: Byrna MAX rounds provide the most stopping power. 🔹 Everyday carry: Pepper rounds give reliable defense without tear gas. 🔹 Training & accuracy practice: Eco-Kinetic or Pro Training rounds are ideal. 🔹 legal restrictions: Kinetic rounds work even where chemical rounds are banned. Must-Answer Questions for Byrna Self-Defense 1. Is the Byrna considered a firearm? USA No, the Byrna is not classified as a firearm under U.S. federal law. The ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives) has confirmed that Byrna launchers are not firearms because they do not use gunpowder, primers, or traditional ammunition. Instead, they rely on CO₂-powered projectiles. This means no background check is required to purchase one, unlike a traditional handgun. Some states and municipalities have restrictions on possession, transportation, or public carry, so check your local laws before use. Canada In Canada, Byrna launchers are classified as firearms under the Canadian Criminal Code, but they are exempt from licensing requirements because their firing velocity remains below 500 feet per second (150 meters per second). While Byrna launchers are technically legal to buy and own in Canada, Canadian law strictly prohibits carrying any weapon, including Byrna launchers, for the purpose of self-defense. Unlike in the U.S., self-defense laws in Canada do not justify the proactive carrying of weapons, even non-lethal ones. Possession of a Byrna launcher is generally restricted to home defense, and carrying one in public—whether concealed or openly—can lead to serious legal consequences under weapons possession laws. Moreover, intent matters under Canadian law. Even if an item is not technically prohibited, carrying it with the intent to use it as a weapon may violate Section 88 of the Criminal Code, which prohibits possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose. This applies to items like bear spray, tactical flashlights, and even everyday objects like canes, if carried with the intent of self-defense. 2. Do I need a permit or background check to own a Byrna? No federal permit is required to own a Byrna launcher, but some state and local regulations apply. California, New York, and Washington D.C. have specific restrictions that may require a special license or ban certain projectiles. International buyers should also check local laws, as some countries classify CO₂-powered self-defense weapons as restricted devices. 3. Where can I legally carry my Byrna launcher? In most U.S. states, Byrna launchers can be carried without a permit. However, some states restrict carrying in public, especially if the launcher resembles a real firearm. Schools, government buildings, and airports often prohibit Byrna devices. International restrictions vary, with Canada, Australia, and parts of Europe banning CO₂-powered launchers entirely. 4. How should I maintain and store my Byrna launcher? Store in a dry, temperature-controlled environment to prevent CO₂ cartridge leaks. Check the launcher monthly for pressure loss or mechanical issues. Clean the barrel and chamber after firing chemical projectiles to prevent residue buildup. 5. Are there any travel restrictions with a Byrna launcher? Checked Baggage Only – Most airlines prohibit carrying Byrna launchers in carry-on luggage but may allow them in checked bags. CO₂ Cartridges & Chemical Rounds Are Restricted – Airlines and international customs often prohibit pressurized gas cartridges and chemical projectiles. State & Country Laws Differ – Some states ban launchers outright, while others allow possession but restrict transportation. 6. Is the Byrna launcher available in different colors? Yes! Byrna launchers are available in multiple colors for legal compliance and personalization. Some states require less-lethal weapons to be distinguishable from firearms. Black / Gray / Tan – Tactical, discreet appearance. Safety Orange / Yellow – Reduces risk of misidentification by law enforcement. 7. Can I leave my Byrna loaded? Yes, but CO₂ cartridges should not remain punctured for extended periods. Byrna recommends replacing CO₂ cartridges every 6-12 months to ensure pressure retention. Leaving a punctured CO₂ cartridge in for too long can lead to leaks and reduced performance. 💡 Pro Tip:  Keep an extra unpunctured CO₂ cartridge in your bag or holster for quick swaps. 8. How long will a CO₂ cartridge last in a Byrna? Unpunctured: Can last years if stored properly. Once punctured: A CO₂ cartridge holds pressure for 24-48 hours, after which it may leak. After firing: A full CO₂ cartridge lasts for 15-20 shots before needing replacement. 9. What is the most powerful Byrna gun? The Byrna LE (Law Enforcement Edition) is the most powerful model, firing at 350 FPS—higher than the standard SD model. It also holds 7 rounds per magazine, compared to 5 rounds in other models. Designed for maximum stopping power and accuracy in self-defense situations. Final Thoughts on Byrna Self-Defense Byrna launchers provide an effective, non-lethal self-defense option without the legal complexities of firearms. Whether you choose the Byrna SD, LE, EP, or TCR, you get reliable personal protection with the ability to deter attackers at a safe distance. ✅ For maximum stopping power: Byrna LE + Byrna MAX projectiles. ✅ For budget-friendly defense: Byrna SD with standard kinetic rounds. ✅ For tactical use: Byrna TCR with high-capacity magazines. Before purchasing, always check local laws and train with your Byrna launcher to be fully prepared for self-defense situations. Want More Non-Lethal Self-Defense Tips? Check out: Best Byrna Gun On Amazon Can You Carry a Byrna Gun in California? Byrna Gun Wounds: First Aid Guide

Police are seen in Delta on Saturday September 20, 2025. (CityNews Image) Delta, B.C.  — A 17-year-old male remains in hospital with serious injuries following a targeted shooting in Delta on Friday evening. Delta Shooting Investigation The Delta Police Department said officers were dispatched at approximately 8:15 p.m. on September 19, 2025, to reports of gunfire in the 900 block of English Bluff Road, near Fred Gingell Park. The victim, identified only as a teenager from another Lower Mainland community, was travelling with a group of high school students on a party bus. The bus had made a stop at the park when the shooting occurred. Police confirmed the teen was struck by gunfire and transported to hospital. His injuries were described as serious. Investigation Investigators believe the incident was targeted. No arrests have been made. A newer model silver or grey Toyota Camry was seen fleeing the area shortly after the shooting. Detectives are seeking any dashcam or CCTV footage that may show the vehicle or suspects. Police have conducted door-to-door canvassing in the surrounding neighbourhood as part of their investigation. Anyone with information is asked to contact the Delta Police Department at 604-946-4444 or email tips@deltapolice.ca . Police Statements In a statement released on Saturday, the Delta Police confirmed the victim was not from Delta and that the shooting took place while the group was visiting. Authorities emphasized that the case is under active investigation. Community and Context The shooting took place near Fred Gingell Park, a public area overlooking the Tsawwassen bluffs. Police said there was no indication of risk to the wider public beyond the targeted incident. According to Delta Police crime reporting data, the municipality has generally recorded lower violent crime rates compared to other Metro Vancouver jurisdictions. However, targeted incidents, while less frequent, have occurred in past years. Current Status Victim: 17-year-old male, serious injuries, hospital care. Suspect vehicle: silver or grey newer model Toyota Camry. Police activity: canvassing, collecting video, ongoing investigation. Public appeal: witnesses and anyone with footage urged to come forward. The investigation remains active, and no further details about suspects or motive have been released.

Vancouver, BC – During a recent court hearing, Martin Charest, the inmate who fatally assaulted convicted serial killer Robert Pickton, testified in court. He pleaded guilty to murder, stating his actions were not for himself but for those Pickton had harmed. Martin Charest's Testimony On Thursday, Charest admitted to using a broken broom handle to assault Pickton at the Port-Cartier federal penitentiary in May 2024. He expressed “no remorse” and asserted that his motive was to bring some form of justice for Pickton’s numerous victims. “I know that we can’t take justice into our own hands, but I killed him for the victims, not for myself,” Charest told the court. Background: Pickton’s Crimes & Death Robert Pickton was convicted in 2007 of six counts of second-degree murder for crimes committed at his pig farm in Port Coquitlam, British Columbia. You can read my full guide on him here . While he was originally charged with many more murders, additional charges were stayed after his life sentence was imposed. On May 19, 2024, Charest attacked Pickton in prison using part of a broken broom handle. Pickton was airlifted to hospital but succumbed to his injuries on May 31, 2024, at the age of 74. Serial killer Robert Pickton, shown here during his murder trial in 2006, was fatally assaulted at the Port-Cartier federal penitentiary in May 2024. (Jane Wolsack/The Canadian Press) The Concept of Vigilante Justice Charest's actions raise important questions about vigilante justice. He claims his motive was retribution on behalf of victims. This courtroom statement forces us to consider how motives are treated when violence occurs behind bars. Is it ever justifiable to take the law into your own hands? When does seeking justice cross the line into unlawful behavior? These are complex questions that society must grapple with. The Impact on Victims' Families The families of Pickton's victims have endured unimaginable pain. They sought justice through the legal system, but many felt it failed them. Charest's actions may resonate with some who believe that true justice was never served. For the families, the question remains: does this act of violence provide closure, or does it open old wounds? The emotional toll is significant, and the impact of such actions can ripple through communities. Legal Implications of Vigilante Actions Charest’s case also highlights the legal ramifications of vigilante justice. While he may feel justified, the law does not typically condone taking matters into one’s own hands. In Canada, the legal system is designed to handle crimes and punish offenders. When individuals act outside of this system, they risk facing severe consequences. Charest now faces a life sentence for his actions, despite his claims of acting for the victims. Public Perception of Justice Public opinion on vigilante justice varies widely. Some view it as a necessary response to a flawed system, while others see it as dangerous and counterproductive. The Pickton case has sparked debates about the effectiveness of the justice system. Are there gaps that need addressing? How can we ensure that victims and their families feel heard and supported? Conclusion: A Call for Reflection The tragic events surrounding Robert Pickton and Martin Charest compel us to reflect on justice, morality, and the law. While Charest may have acted out of a sense of duty to the victims, his actions have led to further violence and legal consequences. As we consider the implications of this case, let’s remember the importance of advocating for a justice system that truly serves all. We must strive for a society where victims feel supported and justice is pursued through lawful means. In the end, the question remains: how can we balance the need for justice with the rule of law? It's a conversation worth having, especially in the context of personal safety and security.