Search Results

Gel manicures are one of the most popular beauty treatments in the world, known for their glossy finish and long-lasting wear. But recently, they’ve been in the spotlight for another reason: on September 1, 2025, the European Union officially banned a common gel nail polish ingredient called TPO (trimethylbenzoyl diphenylphosphine oxide) . This decision has sparked questions for gel manicure lovers outside Europe, especially in Canada and the United States, where TPO is still legal. Many are asking: Does this mean gel manicures are unsafe? Could this ingredient increase my risk of cancer or reproductive harm? Are there TPO-free alternatives I can use instead? We’ll break down what TPO is, why the EU banned it, how Canadian and U.S. regulations differ, and — most importantly — highlight some of the TPO-free gel nail polish brands you can buy right now . Quick Answer : No, gel polish is not banned in Canada or the U.S. The EU banned TPO in 2025 after lab studies raised concerns about reproductive harm. Exposure from occasional manicures is considered low, but many people prefer to play it safe by switching to TPO-free alternatives already available on the market. What Is TPO - and Why Is It Banned in Europe? TPO (trimethylbenzoyl diphenylphosphine oxide) is a chemical used in many gel nail polishes to make them harden quickly under UV or LED lamps. It’s what gives gel manicures that glossy, durable finish. In 2025, the European Union banned TPO in all cosmetics, including nail products. The reason? Lab studies linked high levels of the chemical to potential reproductive harm. Under EU law, any substance flagged as a serious health risk—called a Category 1B chemical—cannot be used in beauty products at all. For the average person, this doesn’t mean getting a gel manicure automatically puts you at risk. The amount of TPO in polish is very small, and real-world exposure from occasional salon visits is considered low. Still, the EU chose a “better safe than sorry” approach, removing TPO from the market entirely. For Canadian and U.S. consumers, this raises the obvious question: If Europe banned it, why is it still allowed here? Are Gel Manicures Dangerous? TPO-free nail polish Explained Many of the gel manicures offered at salons or available in retail stores—from brands such as OPI GelColor Intelli-Gel™, Gelish, CND, and Light Elegance—have relied on TPO or similar photoinitiators to cure quickly under UV or LED lamps. While the amount of TPO in a single manicure is small, our bodies are exposed to far more synthetic chemicals than those of past generations— through food, plastics, cosmetics, and even the air we breathe. Because of this constant exposure, many people prefer to take a “better safe than sorry” approach when it comes to beauty products. Even if the risk from one manicure seems low, it adds to a larger picture of cumulative chemical contact. Here are the top concerns that readers often have about gel manicures: Skin cancer and aging from UV lamps used to cure polish. Cumulative chemical exposure, including TPO and other additives. Pregnancy safety, where many prefer to avoid flagged ingredients altogether. Salon worker exposure, since technicians handle gels daily. Canada and U.S. Regulations – Why TPO Is Still Allowed The European Union has some of the strictest cosmetic safety laws in the world. Once a chemical is classified as a Category 1B  substance, it is automatically banned from all beauty products, regardless of dose. That’s why TPO disappeared from the EU market as of September 2025. In Canada and the United States, the system works differently. Regulators like Health Canada and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) follow a risk-based approach instead of a blanket ban. That means chemicals are evaluated based on the level of real-world exposure, not just their hazard classification. 📌 At the time of writing this: TPO is banned in the EU but still legal in Canada and the U.S. Regulations may change in the future, so it’s worth checking product labels and news updates if you want to stay ahead of the curve. So far, neither Health Canada nor the FDA has restricted TPO. Their reasoning is that the amounts present in gel polish are tiny, and once the polish is cured under a lamp, most of the chemical is locked into the hardened coating. From a risk-based point of view, this makes the likelihood of harm to the average consumer extremely low. For those who don’t want to wait on possible regulatory changes, TPO-free options are already available. Amazon Alternatives: Best TPO-Free Nail Polishes If you’d rather avoid TPO altogether, there are plenty of options. Many global brands are reformulating to comply with the EU’s ban, and some already sell TPO-free gel systems in Canada and the United States. Here are a few of the most reliable choices available on Amazon: OPI Intelli-Gel (TPO-Free) One of the most trusted names in nails. OPI’s Intelli-Gel range is explicitly labeled TPO-free. Venalisa Gel Polish Sets (TPO-Free, HEMA-Free) Venalisa has affordable kits and single bottles that are both HEMA-free and TPO-free. These polishes are designed to cure quickly under LED lamps while avoiding TPO and HEMA. Canni Gel Polish (HEMA-Free, TPO-Free) Canni nail gel has a variety of colors in smaller bottles, all formulated to be HEMA-free and TPO-free. They’re a popular choice for people who want to do their nails at-home and are looking for formulations without flagged chemicals at a lower price point. 👉 Not sure if your favorite brand is TPO-free? Keep scrolling to for a list of brands that commonly use TPO and tips on checking labels. All Your Questions Answered: Gel Nail Polish & TPO Is gel nail polish banned in Canada or the United States? No. The ban on TPO applies only in the European Union. In Canada and the U.S., gel polishes containing TPO are still legal and widely sold. Does gel nail polish cause cancer? There is no direct evidence that gel manicures cause cancer in people. The EU ban on TPO is based on lab studies in animals showing reproductive harm at high doses. The UV lamps used to cure gel polish emit UVA light, which can contribute to skin aging and, in rare cases, skin cancer on the hands. How do I know if my polish has TPO in it? Check the ingredient list for “trimethylbenzoyl diphenylphosphine oxide.” If it’s listed, the polish contains TPO. If you want to avoid it, choose products that are clearly labeled TPO-free. Which brands commonly use TPO? Many mainstream gel polish brands have relied on TPO or similar photoinitiators, including OPI GelColor (non-Intelli-Gel), CND, Gelish, and Light Elegance. If you want to avoid TPO, check labels carefully or look for explicitly TPO-free lines like OPI Intelli-Gel, Venalisa, Canni, and Kiss New York. Are there TPO-free alternatives available? Yes. Brands like OPI Intelli-Gel, Venalisa, Canni, and Kiss New York all offer TPO-free gel polish options that are widely available online. Are gel manicures safe during pregnancy? Research on this is limited. Some people choose to avoid nail products with flagged chemicals during pregnancy. If you’re unsure, it’s best to consult your doctor and look for TPO-free and low-odor options. What about salon workers—are they at risk? Nail technicians face more exposure because they handle polishes daily and breathe in dust and vapors. Good salon ventilation and the use of products formulated without TPO help reduce risks. Does regular (non-gel) nail polish contain TPO? No, TPO is mainly used in UV-cured gel products. Traditional nail polishes usually rely on solvents and film-forming agents, not photoinitiators like TPO. Final Thoughts The EU’s ban on TPO in gel nail polish has sparked global attention, and for good reason. While the chemical helps gel polish cure quickly under UV lamps, it has also been linked to potential health risks in lab studies. For that reason, regulators in Europe chose the cautious route, removing it from all cosmetic products. In Canada and the United States, TPO is still legal, and many gel polishes on the market continue to use it. But consumers here are not without options. Whether you’re concerned about cumulative chemical exposure or just want to align your routine with Europe’s stricter standards, there are plenty of TPO-free nail polishes available. 👉 Ready to make the switch? Scroll back to our TPO-free product recommendations to explore your options.

It’s late, and the parking lot is nearly empty as you walk to your car. The click of your footsteps echoes in the silence, and a chill runs down your spine when you notice a figure following you. You grip your pepper spray, silently thankful you thought to carry it. As the moment passes, you can’t help but wonder—would pepper spray even be the best option? Is it legal? Let's look at the most effective and top 10 self-defense weapons in the U.S. , tailored to fit real-life scenarios. Top 10 Self-Defense Weapons In The US Stun Gun Option 1 or Option 2 (Amazon) Taser Byrna SD "Gun" Pepper Spray 1 or Pepper Spray 2 Sting Ring (aka. Stun Ring) Concealed Pen Knife Kitty Knuckle Keychain Expandable Baton Flashlight Stun Gun Personal Safety Alarm 10 Best Self Defense Weapons For US Citizens 1. Stun Gun  Why Stun Guns Are Effective: Stun guns  are perfect for close encounters where a quick, hidden defense is critical. Its loud crackling and voltage can scare off attackers before you even use it. Lightweight and pocket-sized—fits into any bag or purse. Stun guns require you to physically touch the attacker with the tool to work. Shop Home Security Superstore or Amazon Why Stun Guns Are Effective: A Scenario: Trying to imagine when you'd even use it? Emma never liked walking alone at night, but her stun gun  gave her confidence. It was small enough to fit in her bag and built for close encounters. She sensed him first, and then heard footsteps. A quick glance over her shoulder revealed a man picking up speed, his eyes fixed on her. The man grabbed her arm and yanked her back. Her fingers curled around the pocket-sized stun gun in her bag. She turned sharply—and pressed the button. The air filled with a sudden, violent crackle. Loud, electric, dangerous. His grip loosened, and she shoved past him. By the time he hit the ground, Emma was already running. 2. Taser: Distance is Power Check Taser Price If you're unsure about the difference between a taser and stun gun, a taser can incapacitate an attacker from a distance (typically 15-30 feet) by firing barbed probes that deliver an electrical shock, while a stun gun requires direct physical contact to deliver the shock. “ Taser ” is actually the brand name for the weapons now made by Axon. Scenario: Jake took his usual shortcut home through the alley. Behind him, he heard the heavy tread of boots, and a man in a hoodie called out, “Stop right there!” Jake turned to see the man advancing, holding a knife. His heart raced as the man lunged toward him. Jake pulled out his taser and fired, the prongs hitting their mark. The man froze, muscles locked, and crumpled to the ground. Jake ran, knowing the taser had saved him. Why Tasers Are Effective: Tasers work from a distance, keeping attackers at bay (up to 15-30 feet). They temporarily incapacitate the attacker by disrupting muscle control. Compact and easy to carry, they are perfect for situations where range is critical. Built-in safety features like laser targeting make them simple and effective for self-defense. Byrna SD "Gun" Otherwise known as the "Un-Gun", a Byrna gun is a non-lethal self-defense weapon that looks and performs like a firearm but fires kinetic and chemical irritant projectiles instead of bullets. Why It's Effective: It operates using CO2 cartridges to propel .68 caliber rounds at speeds up to 400 feet per second (FPS). Unlike traditional firearms, Byrna guns require no background check or firearm permit in most areas. With an effective range of up to 80 feet, they provide a safer, legal alternative to conventional weapons for home and personal defense. A Scenario: It’s late at night, and you’re walking to your car in a dimly lit parking lot when you notice a man following you. As they close the distance, your instincts tell you something isn’t right. Instead of panicking, you reach for your Byrna gun, ready to deter any potential threat. The moment you raise it, the figure hesitates—seeing what looks like a firearm and they back off. 4. Pepper Spray: Compact & Powerful Pepper Spray Home Security Superstore OR Amazon Scenario: Kate loved the serenity of her early morning runs—until today. As she rounded a bend in the park, she noticed a man standing off the trail, watching her. Moments later, he was behind her, closing in. When he grabbed at her arm, Kate reacted instantly, pulling the pepper spray from her waistband and aiming it at his face. The spray hit its mark, sending him stumbling and gasping for air as Kate sprinted toward safety. Why Pepper Spray's Effective: Works in seconds by causing intense pain and disorientation. Fits easily in a pocket or on a keychain. You can also find options that clip on. Affordable and legal everywhere in all 50 states (though concentration limits vary). 5. Sting Ring aka Stun Ring Stun Ring Scenario: As Sarah finished her evening jog, she noticed someone lingering near the trailhead, their silhouette stepping into her path. Ignoring her instincts, she moved to pass, but the stranger grabbed for her wrist. Without hesitation, Sarah squeezed the sting ring  concealed in her palm. A crackle of electricity erupted, and the attacker yelped, stumbling back as the stun gun delivered its shock. Why the Sting Ring is Effective: Compact and discreet, it stays hidden in your hand for surprise self-defense. Squeeze-to-activate design makes it quick and easy to use under pressure. Delivers a powerful electrical charge, incapacitating attackers instantly. Lightweight and rechargeable, it’s perfect for joggers, walkers, or anyone on the go. 6. Concealed Pen Knife: Discreet & Effective Concealed Pen Knife Scenario: Mark sat at a quiet bus stop, the street empty. From the corner of his eye, he saw a man approaching. The man stepped into Mark’s space, his tone aggressive as he said, “Hand over your phone now.” Mark’s pulse spiked, but he stayed calm, reaching into his pocket. Instead, he gripped the pen concealed there, twisting it to reveal the hidden blade to the aggressor. The man froze, his eyes locking onto the unexpected weapon, and after a tense moment, he backed off, leaving Mark unharmed. Why a Concealed Pen Knife is Useful: Disguised as a fully functional pen , it blends seamlessly into everyday items. The compact 2-inch blade provides quick and reliable self-defense. Lightweight and easy to carry in a pocket, bag, or clipped to clothing. Perfect for surprise protection in close-encounter situations. 7. Kitty Self Defense Knuckle Keychain Kitty Knuckle Keychain Jenna’s date with Alex had been fine until they reached her car. When she said she wanted to go home, his expression darkened. “Come on, don’t be like that,” he said, stepping in close to block her path. She tried to push past, but he grabbed her wrist and pushed her onto the car door, his hands ripping at her shirt and attempting to yank down her jeans. Her screams were met on deaf ears. Fear shot through her, but instinct kicked in. Jenna slipped her fingers through the kitty knuckle keychain on her bag and struck him hard across the face, the pointed ears catching his cheek. He shouted in pain, releasing her for a split second. Jenna jumped into her car, locked the doors, and drove off, the small, discreet tool giving her the power to fight back when she needed it most. Why a Kitty Knuckle Keychain is Effective: This keychain slips easily over your fingers, turning your fist into an effective self-defense tool. The pointed ears deliver targeted, concentrated pain to stop an attacker instantly. Compact, lightweight, and discreet—easy to carry on your keys for quick access. Perfect for moments when physical action is the only way to protect yourself. 8. Expandable Baton: Old-School Defense Expandable Baton Whether an average U.S. citizen can carry an expandable baton  depends on state laws and local regulations. In some states, batons are classified as weapons and are illegal to carry by civilians without proper permits or licenses, such as in California, Massachusetts, and New York. But, in states like Texas or Florida, expandable batons are generally legal for personal self-defense, as long as they are not misused offensively. Scenario: Walking through the empty parking garage after work, David heard the unmistakable echo of footsteps behind him. He glanced back and saw a man closing in, his posture aggressive. “Hey, I just need to talk to you,” the stranger called out, speeding up. When David turned to confront him, the man reached out, grabbing for his shoulder. Staying calm, David flicked his wrist, and the expandable baton   snapped open with a solid click. The man froze, eyeing the baton, and backed off without another word. Why an Expandable Baton is Effective: Extends instantly, giving you extra reach to keep a safe distance from an attacker. Compact and lightweight when collapsed, making it easy to carry in a bag or holster. Durable steel construction delivers a powerful deterrent without lethal force. 9. Flashlight Stun Gun: A Light In The Dark Flashlight Stun Gun Scenario: The power was out again, and the house sat in complete darkness. She moved cautiously through the hallway with her flashlight , gripping it tightly as she headed toward the breaker box. That’s when she heard the creak of a floorboard behind her. Turning, she saw her husband blocking the doorway. “You think you’re leaving me in the dark?” he sneered, stepping closer. Before she could react, he grabbed her wrist, twisting it painfully. She knew how this dance went. Panic set in, but her free hand pressed the flashlight stun gun against his ribs. The sharp crackle of electricity lit up the room, and he stumbled back with a yell, releasing her. She ran for the front door, the flashlight guiding her way to freedom. Why a Flashlight Stun Gun is Effective: Functions as both a flashlight for visibility and a concealed stun gun for self-defense. Perfect for low-light situations where threats are harder to see. The high voltage quickly incapacitates an attacker, giving you time to escape. Compact, durable, and easy to carry—ideal for emergencies inside or outside the home. 10. Personal Safety Alarm: Alert & Disorient Scenario: Lily had noticed him twice before—once outside the café and again near the library—but brushed it off as coincidence. Now, walking through the quiet neighborhood, her stomach dropped when she saw his shadowy figure following her again, closer this time. Panic set in as his footsteps picked up speed behind her. Without hesitation, Lily pulled the personal panic alarm  from her bag and pressed the button. The earsplitting sound shattered the silence, startling him and sending him stumbling back. Porch lights flicked on, curtains shifted, and neighbors looked out, giving Lily the chance to sprint toward safety. The alarm’s shriek had done its job—drawing attention and scaring off the stalker. Why A Personal Panic Alarm Effective: An alarm that has an earsplitting sound that’s impossible to ignore. Lightweight and easy to clip onto a bag or belt. Perfect for kids, seniors, college students or anyone who doesn't want a tool resembling a weapon. Am I Legally Allowed to Defend Myself In The US? Yes, you are legally allowed to defend yourself in the United States, but laws vary by state. Generally, self-defense is permissible if you are in imminent danger of harm and your response is proportional to the threat. Some states have "Stand Your Ground" laws, allowing you to defend yourself without retreating, while others have "Duty to Retreat" requirements. Always familiarize yourself with your local laws before carrying or using self-defense tools. Choosing the Right Self-Defense Weapon Selecting the ideal self-defense tool depends on your daily routine, local laws, and comfort level. Whether you're looking for something discreet or more tactical, understanding the top 10 self-defense weapons in the US can help you make an informed choice. Being prepared can mean the difference between safety and danger. Stay safe and let me know in the comments if any of these tools have ever saved your life!

Each summer in British Columbia now carries the same warning signs. Skies turn orange. Mountains vanish into haze. The sharp sting of wildfire smoke drifts into the city. What was once rare is now routine. Metro Vancouver has even ranked among the worst cities in the world for air quality during major smoke events. Fine particles in wildfire smoke (PM₂.₅) are especially dangerous. They travel deep into the lungs and bloodstream, triggering asthma, heart problems, and even premature death. Globally, the World Health Organization links air pollution to seven million deaths every year. Some studies have even compared a single day in heavy wildfire smoke to smoking a full pack of cigarettes. This guide explains the risks. It also shares practical solutions, from sealing windows to running portable HEPA air purifiers, to help keep your home livable when smoke lingers for weeks. Why BC Wildfire Smoke Is Becoming a Yearly Issue Wildfires have always been part of British Columbia’s landscape. The difference now is scale. And frequency. In 2023, Canada faced its worst wildfire season on record. More than 18 million hectares burned — an area larger than Greece. BC alone has endured stretches with over 150 active fires at once, many marked “out of control” by the BC Wildfire Service. Climate change is fueling the crisis. Hotter summers, prolonged drought, and dry winds funneled through mountain passes extend fire seasons and make them more intense. For Metro Vancouver, this means wildfire smoke is no longer a rare event that drifts in once a decade. It is now expected every summer. At least one to two weeks of air quality readings land in the “high” or “very high risk” range on the AQHI. The impact is visible. Landmarks like the Lions Gate Bridge, Grouse Mountain, and the Chief in Squamish disappear behind a grey curtain of smoke. Visibility drops. Outdoor life shuts down. And the air measures worse than some of the most polluted cities in the world. What Poor Air Quality Does to Your Health The primary concern is fine particulate matter, or PM₂.₅. According to Health Canada and the WHO, these particles are small enough to bypass the body’s defenses, reach the lungs, and even enter the bloodstream. Quick Health Facts: Short-term exposure can cause sore eyes, coughing, wheezing, and chest tightness Repeated exposure has been associated with higher risks of asthma attacks, heart disease, and reduced lung function Children inhale more air per body weight, making them especially vulnerable Older adults and people with existing conditions are at higher risk of complications Some studies compare breathing wildfire smoke to smoking multiple cigarettes a day. Even for healthy adults, research suggests cumulative effects add up: each smoke season leaves a mark on long-term health. Why Wildfire Smoke Is So Harmful to Breathe What makes wildfire smoke different from city smog is its mix. It contains: PM₂.₅ particles that penetrate lungs and bloodstream Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that irritate airways Carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides, which can contribute to fatigue and cardiovascular stress Research shows wildfire smoke particles can trigger stronger inflammatory responses than those from traffic pollution. This explains why hospital visits spike in BC during smoky weeks, with more cases of asthma flare-ups, COPD complications, and even heart-related emergencies. Smoke also travels long distances. In Vancouver, the worst air days may come from fires burning hundreds of kilometres away in the Interior, or even across the border in Washington State. Are Air Purifiers Part of the Solution? According to the BC Centre for Disease Control and Environment Canada, portable HEPA air cleaners are among the most effective ways to reduce indoor smoke exposure. Studies show a properly sized purifier can cut particle levels indoors by 40 to 80 percent. What to look for: True HEPA filter (H13+) captures 99.97 percent of fine smoke particles Activated carbon filter helps reduce odours and gases CADR rating should be at least two-thirds of your room size for wildfire smoke Reliable sensors matter — cheaper models may not detect smoke accurately and can sit idle when air is hazardous Wildfire smoke is unavoidable outdoors, but with the right purifier, the air in your apartment does not have to match the streets outside. Best Air Purifiers for Different Living Spaces Everyone’s living situation is different. A student in a studio does not need the same purifier as a family in a two-bedroom apartment. Below is a comparison of options that fit common BC households. 1. Levoit Core Mini Suitable for: Bedroom / Student ~178–255 sq ft Features: Compact, HEPA filtration, budget TEBILD Humidifier Suitable for: Two bedroom apartment ~1,200 sq ft Features: 3-stage filter and PM₂.₅ sensor Blue Pure 511i Max Suitable for: Studio apartment ~465 sq ft Features: True HEPA, auto mode, smart features Air Oasis Suitable for: Large apartment or house 1325 sq ft or more Features: Covers 1,325 sq. ft. in one hour or 265 sq. ft. with 5 air exchanges per hour. All Your Wildfire Smoke & Air Quality Questions Answered How bad is wildfire smoke for your health? Health Canada notes wildfire smoke can irritate eyes, throat, and lungs in the short term. Research has linked prolonged or repeated exposure to higher risks of asthma, heart disease, and reduced lung function. Can air purifiers really help during wildfire smoke? Yes. Studies reviewed by the BCCDC show portable HEPA air purifiers can reduce indoor smoke particles by up to 80 percent, lowering exposure when outdoor air quality is poor. How do I know what size purifier I need? Check the CADR rating. For wildfire smoke, choose a purifier with a CADR at least two-thirds of your room’s square footage. What does a 10 on the AQHI mean? On Canada’s Air Quality Health Index, a 10 or higher indicates very high risk. Metro Vancouver often issues air quality advisories when levels reach this range. Why is Vancouver smoky? Vancouver’s position in the Fraser Valley means smoke from Interior or U.S. wildfires can drift in and linger, especially when weather patterns trap pollutants close to the ground. Final Thoughts: Living With Wildfire Smoke in BC Wildfire smoke is now a season of its own in BC. For one or two weeks each summer, the air turns hazardous and the outdoors become unsafe for activity. While you cannot control what burns in the Interior, you can take steps to keep your family safer at home. Public health agencies consistently point to portable HEPA air purifiers as one of the most effective ways to reduce indoor smoke exposure. The right unit for your space means cleaner air during wildfire season, and better year-round protection from dust, pollen, and everyday pollutants. The next time smoke settles over Vancouver or Squamish and Grouse Mountain disappears behind the haze, you will be able to close the door, turn on your purifier, and breathe a little easier knowing your home was ready. Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide medical advice. It summarizes recommendations from public health agencies including Health Canada, the BC Centre for Disease Control, the WHO, and Environment Canada. For personal medical guidance, consult a qualified healthcare professional.

Charlie Kirk hands out hats before speaking at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, on Wednesday. Tess Crowley/The Deseret News/AP The news out of the United States has been chilling. Conservative commentator Charlie Kirk was killed in Utah for his political views. Not long before, former president Donald Trump was shot at a rally and faced another attempt on a golf course. For Canadians watching, it’s easy to scroll past these stories and think, that would never happen here . But history suggests otherwise. If political violence can target well-known names in America, what does that mean for people in Canada who speak out and march for change? What does it mean for free speech? What we know Charlie Kirk, the conservative political activist and co-founder of Turning Point USA, was shot and killed on September 10, 2025, during an event at Utah Valley University. Aged 31, Kirk leaves behind his wife, Erika Frantzve, a former Miss Arizona USA, and their two young children. Political Violence Dominates U.S. Headlines The shooting of Charlie Kirk  in Utah has become one of the most shocking stories in U.S. politics this year. Kirk, a conservative commentator and the founder of Turning Point USA, was targeted and killed for his political views. His death came on the heels of other high-profile incidents: President Trump was shot in the ear at a rally. Weeks later, there was another attempted assassination on a golf course. Together, these attacks paint a clear picture — political violence is no longer rare in America. And for Canadians watching the headlines, the question is immediate: if it can happen there, could it happen here? 5 Times Canada Faced Political Killings Canada does not see political violence as frequently as the United States, but history shows a consistent pattern: people here have been killed for their beliefs, identity, or public stance. Here are five of the most striking cases. 1. The London, Ontario Truck Attack (2021) Four members of the Afzaal family  were murdered while out for a walk. They were deliberately targeted for being Muslim, and prosecutors classified the attack as terrorism. 2. The Toronto Incel Terrorism Case (2020) Ashley Arzaga, just 24 years old, was killed in a Toronto massage parlor by a teenager radicalized by the misogynistic “incel” movement. It was the first time Canada prosecuted gender-based violence as terrorism. 3. The Murder of Trans Rights Activist Julie Berman (2019) Julie Berman, a well-known Toronto activist, was killed in her home. She had spent years organizing Trans Day of Remembrance events and speaking out against anti-LGBTQ+ hate. 4. The Ottawa and Quebec Soldier Killings (2014) Two Canadian soldiers were killed in separate extremist-inspired attacks: Patrice Vincent was run down in Quebec, while Nathan Cirillo was shot at the National War Memorial in Ottawa. 5. The Assassination of Journalist Tara Singh Hayer (1998) Tara Singh Hayer, a Surrey newspaper publisher, was shot dead after years of threats. He had spoken out against violent Sikh extremists and was set to testify in the Air India bombing case. Experts Warn Canada’s Political Divide Is Getting Worse If you’ve been feeling like politics in Canada is getting meaner, you’re not imagining it. The numbers back it up. Hate crimes are climbing.  Police reported nearly 4,800 cases in 2023, a 32 percent jump in just one year. The biggest spikes targeted Jewish, Muslim, and LGBTQ+ communities. Extremism is flagged by CSIS.  Canada’s spy agency says ideologically motivated violent extremism — from incel misogyny to anti-government plots — is now one of the country’s biggest security concerns. Canadians feel the split.  National surveys show more people describing themselves as politically homeless and saying the left and right are drifting further apart. Harassment is normalizing.  Nearly two-thirds of municipal politicians say they’ve been targeted with abuse or threats. Women and visible minorities report the most. All of this adds up to one thing: polarization is rising, extremism is spreading, and the anger is spilling into real life. If Charlie Kirk could be killed for his views in the U.S., what’s stopping the same thing from happening to a Canadian commentator, activist, or journalist? Are Far-Right & Far-Left Extremist Groups Growing? Canada’s security services track threats on both sides of the spectrum. Far-right activity is more visible.  CSIS and the RCMP have repeatedly flagged white nationalist and anti-government groups as the most active extremist networks in Canada. Recent arrests in Quebec linked to a militia-style cell show how these movements can turn violent when armed. Misogyny is fueling violence.  The 2020 Toronto “incel” attack, prosecuted as terrorism, marked the first time Canada treated misogyny as an extremist ideology. Authorities warn that online spaces continue to fuel this kind of violence. Far-left actions are rarer and less deadly.  Canada has seen anarchist and radical environmentalist groups use violence, but mostly against property. The best-known example is the Squamish Five in the 1980s, who bombed a Toronto plant tied to U.S. cruise missile systems and injured several employees. More recently, anarchist groups have claimed sabotage of rail lines and pipeline equipment. These incidents have been serious, but unlike the far-right, they have not led to deaths. The balance is clear: while both sides exist, far-right and grievance-driven extremism have posed the greater danger. And in a climate of rising polarization, the risk that political figures, journalists, or activists could be singled out only grows. Final Thoughts On The Charlie Kirk Shooting: Canada Is Not Immune Charlie Kirk’s killing in the U.S. was shocking, but it wasn’t isolated. From Trump’s rally shooting to attacks on ordinary families, political violence is reshaping public life across the border. Canadians shouldn’t assume it can’t happen here. We’ve seen people killed for their beliefs, their activism, and their identities — from the Afzaal family in 2021 to Tara Singh Hayer in 1998. Hate crimes are up, polarization is rising, and extremism is more visible than ever. The risk isn’t just for politicians. It’s for activists at rallies, journalists at their desks, women speaking out online, or communities simply going for a walk. Canada may not face U.S. levels of gun violence, but the conditions for political violence exist here. Which leaves the uncomfortable question: if it’s happened before — and if divisions keep getting worse — when will it happen again?

Every day in the United States, nearly 2,000 workers sustain job-related eye injuries serious enough to need medical attention. Across North America as a whole, that number climbs even higher with experts estimating that 90% of these incidents could be prevented with proper protective eyewear. Choosing the best safety glasses isn’t just about comfort, it’s about preventing accidents and meeting safety standards that protect your vision. In this guide, we’ll break down the essentials: ANSI Z87.1 certification (the U.S. gold standard), polycarbonate lenses, coatings like anti-fog and UV protection, and how to find the right fit for long-term wear. 3 Best Safety Glasses Duarte Premium Safety Glasses Over Eyeglasses ANSI Z87.1 certified impact-resistant polycarbonate lenses Amazon Anti-fog & scratch-resistant coatings, UV400 protection Wraparound / full-coverage design, side shields, over-glasses fit so you can wear them if you use prescription lenses underneath FIMOSON Safety Glasses  Polycarbonate lenses with ANSI Z87.1 impact rating Amazon   Scratch-resistant, wrap-around coverage for better side protection Good value (2-pack) so you can have a spare or share between uses/environments METEL M10 Safety Glasses – 12-Pack Lightweight  Light weight polycarbonate frame & lenses meeting ANSI Z87 standard Bulk pack (12 pieces) is good for teams, workshops What Makes Safety Glasses “Best” – Key Features to Look For When it comes to safety glasses, not all pairs are created equal. The best safety glasses  combine performance, comfort, and certified protection. Here are the features that matter most: Impact Resistance and Certification: Look for eyewear stamped with ANSI Z87.1  (required in the U.S. for OSHA compliance). In Canada, CSA Z94.3 is the parallel standard. These markings prove the glasses can withstand high-velocity impact and protect against flying debris, one of the most common causes of workplace eye injuries. Lens Material: Most high-quality safety glasses use polycarbonate lenses , which are up to 10 times more impact-resistant than standard plastic or glass. They’re lightweight and offer built-in UV protection — ideal for both indoor and outdoor use. Trivex is another advanced option, offering excellent optical clarity and durability. Lens Coatings: Anti-fog coatings  prevent lenses from clouding during heavy work or temperature changes. Scratch-resistant coatings  extend the lifespan of the glasses. UV coatings  block 99–100% of harmful UVA and UVB rays, protecting long-term eye health. Polarized or tinted options  are ideal for outdoor work, reducing glare. Durability: Look for models made with shatter-resistant frames  and replaceable lenses. Since scratches and wear can reduce clarity, being able to swap out lenses extends the life of your eyewear. Certifications & Standards Explained Not all safety glasses are equal — the markings on the frame or lens tell you if they’re certified to protect your eyes in real-world conditions. Here’s what you need to know: ANSI Z87.1 (United States) This is the gold standard for workplace eye protection in the U.S. Glasses with an ANSI Z87.1  or Z87+  marking meet OSHA requirements. Z87.1  covers basic impact protection. Z87+  means high-impact resistance (tested against stronger, high-velocity impacts). Other codes may appear: U  = UV filter protection D3  = Splash and droplet protection D4/D5  = Dust protection CSA Z94.3 (Canada) The Canadian standard, enforced under provincial safety regulations. Similar to ANSI but tested separately under CSA protocols. Glasses will have a CSA  mark to show compliance. EN166 (Europe) Often found on imported or global brands. Includes a coding system: “F” for low impact, “B” for medium impact, “A” for high impact. Military & Ballistic Standards (Specialized Use) Military/tactical eyewear may have MIL-PRF 32432  or similar standards. Provides extra assurance for law enforcement, shooting sports, and military training. Why It Matters OSHA requires employers to provide eyewear that meets ANSI Z87.1 . Without proper certification, glasses may shatter on impact, leaving eyes unprotected. For consumers, certification symbols are the quickest way to tell if glasses are truly safe or just fashion eyewear marketed as protective. Lens Materials & Coatings: Choosing the Right Combination The lens material and coating can make or break how effective (and comfortable) your safety glasses are. Here’s what to consider: Polycarbonate Lenses Most popular choice in the U.S. and Canada. Up to 10x more impact-resistant than glass or standard plastic. Lightweight and naturally block 99% of UV rays. Slightly less scratch-resistant unless coated. Trivex Lenses High clarity and impact resistance, similar to polycarbonate. Lighter weight and thinner profiles, often used in prescription safety glasses. More expensive, but worth it for optical precision. Glass Lenses Provide excellent clarity and scratch resistance. Heavy and prone to shattering — rarely used in modern safety glasses. Coating Options That Matter Anti-Fog Coating : Prevents condensation in humid conditions, labs, or when moving between temperatures. Some lenses meet ANSI “N” rating for anti-fog. Scratch-Resistant Coating : Extends lens life, important for polycarbonate lenses. UV Protection : Look for UV400 rating — 100% protection against UVA and UVB rays. Polarized Lenses : Reduce glare, ideal for outdoor work, construction, and driving. Tinted or Mirror Finishes : Improve comfort in bright light; indoor/outdoor transition tints are also available. Blue Light Filtering : Helps reduce digital eye strain for workers switching between screens and physical tasks. Which Should You Choose? Indoor work  → clear polycarbonate with anti-fog and scratch resistance. Outdoor work  → polycarbonate with UV and polarized/tinted options. Precision tasks (lab, medical, electronics)  → Trivex for clarity and lighter weight. All-day wear  → coatings that reduce fog and scratches for long-term usability. Final Thoughts With thousands of preventable injuries happening every day in the U.S. and across North America, the right pair of safety glasses makes all the difference. The best choice will combine ANSI Z87.1 certification, durable polycarbonate lenses, coatings for anti-fog and UV protection, and a fit that keeps you comfortable for hours. When comparing options, think about your environment: construction, lab work, outdoor tasks, or DIY projects at home. Each setting brings different risks, but OSHA and CSA standards make it clear that certified eyewear is the baseline for protection. Stay safe!

Frazier Institute You never see a bill when you leave a doctor’s office in Canada. No invoice. No tap of a credit card. But “free” isn’t really free. The Fraser Institute’s 2025 study shows a single worker earning $57,931 pays $5,703 a year in hidden healthcare taxes. That’s almost 10% of their income gone before rent, groceries, or gas. Couples and families are paying even more: Single worker:  $5,703 Single parent with one child:  $10,516 Couple without children:  $17,338 Family of four:  $19,060 For Vancouver workers already stretched by high housing and food costs, these hidden healthcare costs raise an important question: Are Canadians getting ripped off compared to other countries?  To find out, we’ll compare how much workers pay in the UK and Australia, and look at how wait times stack up across all three systems. What Is Canada’s Hidden Healthcare Bill? For a single worker, the annual cost is clear: $5,703 in taxes goes toward healthcare. For a family of four, it’s nearly $19,060. These amounts are built into your taxes, not listed on any receipt. And the bill keeps climbing. Since 1997, healthcare costs for the average Canadian family have grown: 2.2× faster than food 1.6× faster than shelter 1.6× faster than income Even when pay cheques rise, healthcare takes a bigger slice every year. Unlike groceries or rent, you don’t see it on the statement — it’s deducted before your money even hits the bank. Who Feels the Burden Most? The Fraser Institute’s income breakdown shows how the burden shifts. Lowest 10 percent of earners: pay about $726 a year, about 6 percent of income Middle 10 percent: pay $7,563 a year, about 9.3 percent of income Top 10 percent: pay $43,166 a year, about 9.6 percent of income While lower earners pay less in dollar terms, middle and higher income households shoulder far bigger totals. Close to 10 percent of their pay goes to healthcare. For a single Vancouver worker, the annual cost matches major expenses like food or transport. How Much Does the UK Pay for Healthcare? Average salary in London: about £50,000 Single worker pays: about £3,300 to £3,500 a year in taxes, or 6 to 7 percent of income The National Health Service (NHS) covers nearly all essential care. GP visits, hospital stays, and birth control are free at the point of use. Prescriptions cost £9.65 per item in England, but are free in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Out of pocket costs are lighter than in Canada, but patients face wait times that vary by region and procedure. How Much Does Australia Pay for Healthcare? Average salary in Melbourne: about AUD $78,000 Single worker pays: about AUD $6,800 to $7,000 a year, or about 9 percent of income Australia funds its Medicare system with general taxation and a 2 percent Medicare Levy that shows up directly on tax returns. On top of that, many Australians face gap fees of $40 to $60 when visiting a GP, since not all clinics bulk bill. Prescriptions are subsidised through the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, but not free. Higher earners without private hospital insurance also face a surcharge of 1 to 1.5 percent of income. Australians are guaranteed coverage, but unlike Canadians they have a comparatively small charge compared to the whole cost of healthcare directly at the point of care. Wait Times: Canada vs the UK and Australia Paying thousands in hidden taxes would be easier to accept if care was fast. But Canada’s wait times are among the longest in the developed world. Type of Visit or Procedure Canada Australia UK Specialist appointment (1 month or more) About 61% of patients wait a month or longer Lower share, usually weeks not months Long waits common, many patients wait months for non urgent care Elective surgery average wait About 27 weeks from referral to treatment (2024 Fraser) About 48 days (national average for elective procedures) Multiple months depending on region and procedure For a single worker in Vancouver, that means paying $5,703 in hidden taxes and still waiting more than six months on average for treatment. In Australia, elective procedures move more quickly. In the UK, access varies, but wait times are shorter for many services than in Canada. Canada’s median health-care wait time hits 30 weeks—longest ever recorded Are We Getting Value for Money? Here is how the comparison shakes out for single workers: Canada, income $57,931: $5,703 a year, about 10 percent of income UK, income £50,000: £3,300 to £3,500 a year, about 6 to 7 percent of income Australia, income $78,000: $6,800 to $7,000 a year, about 9 percent of income Canada is not an outlier in percentage terms. But the difference lies in what you get. Canadians face longer waits than either the UK or Australia. Canadians also pay extra out of pocket for prescriptions, dental, and vision. Middle and higher income households in Canada see large absolute costs, approaching $20,000 for families. Final Thoughts: Hidden Healthcare Costs Vancouver The Fraser Institute’s conclusion is hard to ignore. Healthcare in Canada is not free. It is one of the biggest items on every pay cheque. With rising costs, gaps in coverage, and long waits, Canadians are right to ask whether they are really getting value for the money.

What We Know So Far False claim : 77-year-old Michael Mallinson of Toronto was falsely named online as the shooter. Confirmed suspect : Police have identified Tyler Robinson, 22, of Utah  as the man charged in Charlie Kirk’s killing. The incident : Kirk, 31, co-founder of Turning Point USA, was shot dead on Sept. 10 during an event at Utah Valley University. Fact checks : AFP, Al Jazeera, and Global News confirmed Mallinson had no involvement. Impact : Mallinson says he deleted his social media accounts after abusive messages. Canadian Misidentified as Charlie Kirk Shooter Toronto retiree Michael Mallinson, 77, was at home with his wife on September 10 when Charlie Kirk was shot in Utah. He says they had been running errands at Yorkdale Mall earlier in the day before returning home, where he took a nap. When he woke, his daughter was on the phone, panicked and telling him to delete his social media accounts. “I was quite alarmed,” Mallinson told CTV News. “You never want to have your name out and about.” Mallinson soon learned that an old photo of him, taken from a deleted X account, had been circulated online and tied to false claims that he was the shooter. The posts, some coming from impersonation accounts, spread rapidly and were shared thousands of times. The retiree, who spends his time rowing and working with patient advocacy groups for axial spondylarthritis, said the accusations left him shaken. He and his family began receiving abusive messages, including Facebook comments calling him “all sorts of names.” He told CTV News that while he initially hoped the rumor would fade, he feared for his safety once his photo became widely linked to the killing. “Ultimately, yes,” Mallinson said when asked if he felt in danger. “Once something is up on social media, it’s very hard to get rid of.” The ordeal forced him to deactivate his Facebook, Instagram, and Threads accounts, cutting him off from advocacy groups he had been part of. “I was pretty loathed to delete myself from Facebook and sever those relationships without being able to tell them why,” he added. Fact-Checking the Claims AFP Fact Check  called the accusations “entirely false.” Al Jazeera  documented how the false posts gained traction before being debunked. Global News  confirmed Mallinson’s alibi and interviewed him directly. A man who was in Toronto at the time of Charlie Kirk’s murder was misidentified as a suspect. (CTV News) Why It Matters Wrongful identifications after major crimes are not new, but they carry serious risks. The case of a Canadian misidentified as Charlie Kirk shooter shows how quickly false claims can spread before police release verified details. In the hours after Kirk’s killing, social media users circulated the name and photograph of Toronto retiree Michael Mallinson, presenting him as the gunman before authorities had confirmed a suspect. Fact-checkers later debunked the claim, and investigators have since arrested 22-year-old Tyler Robinson of Utah. For Mallinson, the impact was immediate. He told Canadian media he was “shocked and horrified” to wake up to messages accusing him of being a political assassin. He received abusive messages online, saw his photograph tied to false political narratives, and ultimately deleted his social media accounts out of concern for his safety and reputation. Experts say such cases illustrate a recurring pattern: in the gap before official information is released, misinformation spreads quickly and can permanently damage the lives of those wrongly named. The authorities in Utah were still searching Wednesday night for the person who killed Charlie Kirk.Credit ...Kim Raff for The New York Times Similar incidents have followed other high-profile crimes, such as the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, when innocent people were misidentified online, and the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, when false names circulated widely. Beyond individual harm, false identifications can also mislead the public and complicate investigations. Law enforcement officials warn that speculation distracts from credible leads, while false narratives continue to linger online long after they have been disproven. Wrongful identifications after major crimes are not new, but they carry serious risks. In the hours after Charlie Kirk’s killing, social media users circulated the name and photograph of Toronto retiree Michael Mallinson, presenting him as the gunman before police had confirmed a suspect. Fact-checkers later debunked the claim, and authorities have since arrested 22-year-old Tyler Robinson of Utah. For Mallinson, the impact was immediate. He told Canadian media he was “shocked and horrified” to wake up to messages accusing him of being a political assassin. He received abusive messages online, saw his photograph tied to false political narratives, and ultimately deleted his social media accounts out of concern for his safety and reputation. Experts say such cases illustrate a recurring pattern: in the gap before official information is released, misinformation spreads quickly and can permanently damage the lives of those wrongly named. Similar incidents have followed other high-profile crimes, such as the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, when innocent people were misidentified online, and the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, when false names circulated widely. Beyond individual harm, false identifications can also mislead the public and complicate investigations. Law enforcement officials warn that speculation distracts from credible leads, while false narratives continue to linger online long after they have been disproven. What’s Next With 22-year-old Tyler Robinson now in custody, investigators in Utah are continuing to gather evidence linking him to Charlie Kirk’s killing. Police have cited surveillance footage, digital messages, and a Mauser rifle recovered near the scene, but they have not released a full statement on his motive. Court proceedings in the months ahead are expected to clarify the timeline and Robinson’s intentions. For Michael Mallinson, the Canadian retiree wrongly named as the shooter, the focus is on moving past the false accusations. He has described receiving abusive messages and deleting his social media accounts after his photo and name circulated widely. He said he may consider suing people or websites who circulated the falsehood if the ordeal continued.

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) has confirmed that major grocery chains misused “Product of Canada” labelling on imported food items during the recent U.S.-Canada trade dispute. Between November 2024 and September 2025, the agency investigated 167 complaints about false or misleading country-of-origin claims, finding dozens of cases where imported goods were incorrectly marketed as Canadian. Rise in Complaints About “Product of Canada” Labelling Over the past year, complaints about country-of-origin claims in Canadian grocery stores climbed sharply. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency logged 167 cases between November 2024 and September 2025, most of them during the months when tariffs on U.S. goods were in effect. By early September, inspectors had reviewed 137 of the complaints. Nearly half of those investigations confirmed that imported items had been mislabelled as Canadian. Canadian Food Inspection Agency FIA Investigation: Dozens of Cases Confirmed The Canadian Food Inspection Agency said 45 grocery stores were linked to the confirmed cases of mislabelling. Forty-two of the stores were flagged once, while three received two complaints each. In every instance, investigators determined the stores had incorrectly labelled imported food as Canadian. The agency did not disclose which companies were involved. Although the CFIA has authority to fine grocers up to $15,000 per offence, no financial penalties were issued. Instead, the agency required corrective action in every case of non-compliance. Measures included reviewing retail labelling processes, issuing reminder letters about regulatory requirements, raising staff awareness about the importance of accurate labelling, and following up to confirm changes had been made. Why Tariffs Fueled the Labelling Controversy The rise in mislabelling complaints coincided with Canada’s trade dispute with the United States. During the tariff period, tens of thousands of Canadians signed petitions urging grocery chains to promote domestic products. Major retailers, including Loblaw, Sobeys and Metro, responded by pledging to highlight Canadian goods with maple leaf symbols and “Made in Canada” tags. At the same time, shoppers began reporting instances of imported items displayed under Canadian labels, raising doubts about the accuracy of the promotions. The CFIA’s findings confirmed that some of those complaints were valid, adding scrutiny to retailers already under pressure over food prices and supply chain costs. What the Rules Say: Product of Canada vs. Made in Canada Under CFIA guidelines, the terms “Product of Canada” and “Made in Canada” have specific meanings. “Product of Canada” can only be used when virtually all major ingredients, processing, and labour originate in Canada. “Made in Canada,” by contrast, may appear on items containing imported ingredients if the last substantial transformation occurred domestically. Consumer advocates have long argued that the rules can be confusing, especially when promotions or store labels feature maple leaf symbols without context.  Loblaw Companies president and chief executive Per Bank welcomed the removal of tariffs in a recent statement, saying prices would “come down over time, as we sell through inventory that was purchased based on tariffed pricing.” The CFIA said all implicated stores corrected their practices. Still, the episode highlighted how sensitive origin claims have become for Canadians trying to track where their food comes from. Final Thoughts Canada lifted its retaliatory tariffs on American goods on September 1, ending nearly a year of heightened trade tensions. For the CFIA, the mislabelling cases underscored the importance of clear standards on country-of-origin claims. While no fines were issued, the agency said corrective actions were taken in every case of non-compliance. For consumers, the investigation reinforced the need to look closely at labels, as debates over what qualifies as a “Product of Canada” remain central to how food is marketed in grocery stores.

A police officer in Sooke, B.C., on April 14, 2022. (CTV News) Sooke Teen Assault RCMP Arrests Seven Youths The Sooke RCMP confirmed that seven teenagers were arrested following the July 2, 2025 assault near the 6600 block of Goodmere Road. The Sooke teen assault RCMP arrests came after investigators determined the incident involved a group of youths attacking another youth, with the assault later recorded and shared on social media. On July 3, the victim’s family contacted police to report the attack. Evidence gathered during the investigation led officers to identify the seven suspects, and warrants for their arrests were issued. All of the teens have since been taken into custody and are facing criminal charges. Timeline of the Sooke Assault Investigators said they were contacted by the victim’s family on July 3. Evidence gathered in the case led police to identify seven youths as participants in the assault. Warrants were obtained, and all seven suspects have since been arrested. Staff Sergeant Greg Willcocks, the detachment commander for Sooke RCMP, acknowledged concerns in the community after one of the arrests took place near school grounds. “We are taking the allegations of this assault very seriously,” he said in a statement. Youth Criminal Justice Act Because all of the suspects are under 18, their identities are protected under the federal Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA). The legislation prohibits the release of names or other details that could identify youth accused of crimes. As a result, police did not provide further information about the seven arrested teens, including their ages or the specific charges they may face. Public Information Sooke RCMP is asking anyone with information about the incident to contact the detachment at 250-642-5241. Corporal Alex Bérubé, District Advisory NCO for BC RCMP Island District, is the media contact for the case. He can be reached at 250-380-6110 or by email at alex.berube@rcmp-grc.gc.ca .

Members of the Vancouver Police forensics team examine a victim's phone while investigating the scene where a vehicle drove into crowd at a street festival Saturday evening in Vancouver, Sunday, April 27, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Rich Lam The suspect in the Vancouver Lapu Lapu Day festival attack  has been declared mentally fit to stand trial. Adam Kai-Ji Lo now faces 42 charges, including 11 counts of second-degree murder and 31 counts of attempted murder, after the April 26 SUV assault that left 11 people dead and dozens injured. Vancouver Lapu Lapu Day Festival Attack: What Happened on April 26 The attack took place during evening celebrations along Fraser Street, where hundreds had gathered for the annual festival. An SUV plowed into the crowd, killing 11 people and injuring dozens more. Witnesses described scenes of panic as emergency crews and bystanders rushed to help victims. Flowers and memorials were placed along Fraser Street in the days that followed, marking what Mayor Ken Sim later called “the darkest day in the history of Vancouver.” Adam Kai-Ji Lo Ruled Fit to Stand Trial At a provincial court hearing in Vancouver, Judge Reginald P. Harris ruled that Adam Kai-Ji Lo is mentally fit to stand trial. The decision followed a fitness hearing in July where two forensic psychiatrists were called as expert witnesses before legal arguments were presented by Crown prosecutor Michaela Donnelly and defence lawyer Mark Swartz. In his ruling, Harris said Lo understands the nature and consequences of the proceedings, can communicate with his lawyer, and is able to conduct his defence. The judge also ordered Lo be detained in hospital while awaiting trial. Because of a publication ban, the specific evidence and testimony that led to the ruling cannot be reported, though the outcome itself is public. A media consortium, including The Canadian Press, is challenging the scope of the ban, with a ruling expected later this week. New Charges Laid: Murder and Attempted Murder Counts Prosecutors confirmed that Adam Kai-Ji Lo now faces a total of 42 criminal charges. In addition to the 11 counts of second-degree murder filed shortly after the incident, the B.C. Prosecution Service has added 31 charges of attempted murder, each tied to surviving victims of the April 26 attack. Vancouver Police Chief Const. Steve Rai called the decision “another step toward answers and accountability in one of the most horrific incidents our city has ever faced.” He praised investigators for their work on what he described as a mass-casualty case that has tested the department’s resources and resolve. Police said the expanded list of charges reflects the scope of the tragedy and ensures every victim is represented in court proceedings. Community Reaction to the Vancouver Lapu Lapu Day Tragedy Outside provincial court, Kristina Corpin-Moser of Filipino B.C. said the ruling brings mixed emotions for the community. While there is relief that the case will proceed to trial, she noted it also signals the beginning of a long and difficult process for survivors and families of victims. Mayor Ken Sim called April 26 “the darkest day in the history of Vancouver” and said he is encouraged to see the case moving forward. “It is good to know that the victims, their families and the surrounding community will have the chance to receive justice,” he said in a statement. Community members have continued to hold memorials along Fraser Street, with flowers and messages left at the scene. Advocacy groups say many residents remain focused on healing and supporting one another as the trial approaches. Public Safety Review After Vancouver Festival Attack In the aftermath of the tragedy, the City of Vancouver launched a review of safety measures for large public gatherings. The final report, released in early September, concluded that planning for the Lapu Lapu Day festival had followed required protocols, including a risk assessment that deemed the likelihood of a major incident low. Despite this finding, the review outlined new recommendations aimed at preventing similar attacks. Among the proposals were stronger vehicle barriers at festival sites, revised traffic control plans, and closer coordination between event organizers and law enforcement. Mayor Ken Sim said the recommendations are an important step toward restoring public confidence. “We must ensure that when residents gather to celebrate, they feel safe,” he said. City officials are now considering whether permanent vehicle barriers should be installed in high-traffic festival areas. What Comes Next in the Vancouver Lapu Lapu Day Festival Case With 42 charges now before the court, the trial of Adam Kai-Ji Lo is expected to be lengthy and closely watched. A publication ban continues to restrict details of the psychiatric evidence presented during the fitness hearing, though media organizations are challenging the scope of the order. For families and survivors, the legal process represents both a path to accountability and a reminder of the April 26 tragedy. City officials say the case, along with the safety review, will shape how Vancouver manages public festivals in the years ahead.

You pick up a mascara or perfume in Seattle, the same one you’ve seen on shelves in Vancouver. The packaging looks identical. But what’s inside may not be. Canada and the United States follow different rules for cosmetics. Health Canada enforces a “Hotlist” of banned or restricted chemicals, while the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not require pre-market approval for most products and has no central banned list. That split means a fragrance or nail polish bought legally in an American store can contain ingredients that regulators in Canada have already prohibited for safety reasons. Why Canada and the U.S. Treat Cosmetics Differently Canada’s cosmetic rules are built around prevention. Health Canada updates its Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist regularly, giving companies a clear list of substances they cannot use. The U.S. system developed differently. The Food and Drug Administration does not review most cosmetics before they are sold, and there is no centralized banned list. Instead, responsibility often falls to the courts, state governments, or recalls after a product is already on the market. For consumers, that means Canada emphasizes blocking high-risk ingredients up front, while the U.S. relies more on catching problems later. That means a mascara sold legally in the U.S. may not meet Canadian requirements. 6 Chemicals Banned in Canadian Cosmetics but Still Allowed in the U.S. 1. Phthalates (DEP, DBP, DEHP) Phthalates are chemicals used to make nail polish flexible and fragrances last longer. They are manufactured by reacting phthalic anhydride with alcohols and are common in perfumes, sprays, and nail products. Health Canada prohibits DEHP in cosmetics because of evidence of reproductive and developmental risks. In the U.S., phthalates are not federally banned in cosmetics, meaning certain products sold in American stores may still contain them, while Canadian versions must comply with stricter rules. 2. Formaldehyde and Methylene Glycol Formaldehyde, or its liquid form methylene glycol, can be present in hair-smoothing treatments and some nail hardeners. It can also be released in small amounts from preservatives such as DMDM hydantoin in shampoos and lotions. Health Canada prohibits formaldehyde and methylene glycol in most cosmetics, allowing only limited use in nail hardeners with warning labels. The FDA has not imposed a broad federal ban, though a proposed rule would restrict use in hair straighteners. This difference means certain products may be marketed in the U.S. that would not be permitted in Canada. 3. Mercury in Skin-Lightening and Eye Products Mercury compounds have historically been used in skin-lightening creams and some eye-area products. Exposure to mercury has been associated with kidney and neurological effects. Mercury is prohibited in all cosmetics in Canada. In the U.S., up to 65 ppm is still technically allowed in eye-area products if no safer alternative is available, although the FDA has stated that no such products are currently marketed. 4. Benzene (Contaminant) Benzene is a petroleum-derived solvent that has been associated in studies with blood disorders and cancers. It is not added intentionally to cosmetics but has occasionally been detected as a contaminant in aerosol products such as dry shampoos and sunscreens. Benzene is listed on Health Canada’s Hotlist as prohibited in cosmetics. In the U.S., there is no explicit federal ban in cosmetics, and recalls are issued only if testing shows unacceptable levels. 5. Fragrance Allergens Fragrance mixtures can contain dozens of chemicals, including allergens such as limonene and linalool. These are used widely in perfumes, shampoos, lotions, and soaps. Canada has adopted new rules requiring more than 80 fragrance allergens to be listed on cosmetic labels by 2028. In the U.S., labels are not yet required to disclose these allergens individually and may only list “fragrance” as a generic term. 6. Talc (Asbestos Risk) Talc is a mineral used in powders, blushes, and pressed makeup for its absorbent and silky texture. Concerns arise because natural talc deposits can be contaminated with asbestos, a known carcinogen. Health Canada has assessed talc as a potential health risk and is moving toward tighter restrictions. In the U.S., talc remains permitted in cosmetics, though the FDA has proposed new testing standards to monitor for asbestos contamination. Screenshot the Chemicals Banned in Canadian Cosmetics staysafevancouver.com Why the Rules on Chemicals Banned in Canadian Cosmetics Differ From the U.S. Both countries look at scientific evidence, but they act on it in different ways. Canada often applies a precautionary approach. If there is credible evidence a chemical may pose a risk, restrictions or bans are put in place sooner. The U.S. typically waits for stronger, long-term proof before acting, which means some ingredients remain legal there for longer. Legal frameworks also differ. In the U.S., cosmetics law has historically given manufacturers more freedom and fewer pre-market checks, while Canada requires ingredient notification and maintains an active Hotlist. Industry influence plays a role as well. The U.S. market is larger and lobbying pressure is stronger, which can slow down regulatory changes. Canada has generally leaned more toward risk aversion and consumer protection in its cosmetic safety decisions. What This Means for Shoppers The same brand may sell different versions of a product depending on the country. Products marketed in Canada are required to comply with Health Canada’s rules, while U.S. formulations may include ingredients that are restricted here. For consumers, the key point is that Canada applies a more precautionary approach. When buying products online or from U.S. retailers, it is possible to purchase cosmetics that would not meet Canadian requirements. How Consumers Can Make Informed Choices Read labels : Ingredient lists can help identify substances of concern, such as formaldehyde-releasing preservatives. Purchase from Canadian retailers : Products marketed in Canada must follow Health Canada’s Hotlist and labeling rules. Check recalls : Both Health Canada and the FDA maintain online recall lists for cosmetics. Look for voluntary claims : Labels such as “phthalate-free” or “fragrance-free” are sometimes used by brands to market transparency. FAQ: Chemicals Banned in Canadian Cosmetics vs the U.S. Are parabens banned in Canada? No. Parabens are still allowed in Canadian cosmetics, though Health Canada monitors their safety. What cosmetic ingredients are banned in Canada? Canada prohibits ingredients such as DEHP (a phthalate), mercury, formaldehyde, benzene, and is reviewing talc and PFAS. What cosmetic ingredients are banned in the U.S.? The U.S. bans relatively few cosmetic ingredients, mainly mercury above 65 ppm and certain unapproved color additives. Can American makeup be sold in Canada? Yes, but products sold in Canada must comply with Health Canada’s Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist and related regulations. Why are some beauty products banned in Canada but not the U.S.? Canada maintains a precautionary Hotlist that restricts more chemicals, while U.S. oversight allows most ingredients unless later deemed unsafe. Is talc banned in Canada? No. Talc is not yet banned, but Health Canada has flagged it as a potential risk and is considering restrictions. Are PFAS banned in Canadian cosmetics? Not yet. Canada is reviewing PFAS as a class, while certain U.S. states such as California have already enacted bans. Is Sephora makeup the same in Canada and the U.S.? Not always. Brands may reformulate products to meet Canadian requirements, so ingredient lists can differ between countries. Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only. It is based on publicly available information from Health Canada, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and related regulatory sources. It is not intended as legal or medical advice. For specific concerns about cosmetics safety or compliance, consult official government resources or a qualified professional.

Are you worried about being physically overpowered? Wondering whether it’s legal to carry a taser or stun gun in Canada for self-defense? Let’s look into your rights as a person defending themselves against an attacker and the laws that you’re up against. Quick Answers 10 Alternatives To Stun Guns For Self Defense Are Stun Guns Legal In Canada? Are Tasers Legal In Canada? Zap the Confusion: Difference Between Stun Guns & Tasers What Hurts More, a Stun Gun or Taser? Are Stun Guns or Tasers Lethal? Do Stun Guns Go Through Clothes? Do Stun Guns Look The Same As Tasers? Are Tasers Legal? Difference Between A Stun Gun vs Taser In Canada, tasers are illegal for civilians to carry as self-defense weapons and are classified as "prohibited weapons." Tasers can only be used by law enforcement for self-defense and crowd control because there are many concerns about the potential harm they can cause when they’re used improperly. Canadian law enforcement have strict guidelines and training programs in place for using tasers. The RCMP have to re-certify every year to continue carrying a “conducted energy weapon. ” Sometimes the term “stun gun” and “taser” gets used interchangeably because they’re both conducted-energy weapons, but let’s break down the many differences. “ Taser ” is actually the brand name for the weapons now made by Axon. This electro-shock weapon fires tiny probes or darts that are connected to thin wires, causing neuromuscular incapacitation. This pistol-looking device is intended to be used for personal protection because they can reach targets up to 15 feet away, and the probes can emit multiple cycles of electricity of around 50,000 volts. The target is struck by the darts, which deliver electricity through the wires, disrupting the neuromuscular system and rendering the target temporarily paralyzed or if overused, potentially rendering them unconscious. The taser causes muscles to contract up to 19 times per second. Stun guns are for close range combat and have metal prongs at the top of the device. They are block-shaped like an electric shaver, but you can find them concealed in the form of a torch, phone or flashlight. They give the attacker a very painful, high-voltage shock - the pain is temporary but it does not paralyze the entire body like a taser does. At approximately three milliamps, the charge is not strong enough to damage the target’s body unless you hold down the weapon for an excessively long period of time. Officers are trained to use all energy-conducting weapons are only supposed to use them when a person is “causing, or may soon cause, themselves or someone else harm.” Are Stun Guns or Tasers Legal In Canada? You may be tempted to carry one in your handbag, but personal stun guns are illegal in Canada, and if you possess one, this is considered a criminal offense and possession of a weapon. Canada categorizes weapons into “prohibited” and “unprohibited weapons.” And both stun guns and tasers are considered prohibited weapons. Stun guns can only be used by police officers who use them as a non-lethal alternative to firearms. The RCMP are permitted to use stun guns in situations where they feel under threat (according to the Canadian Criminal Code Section 85) and where all other options have been exhausted. This includes verbal communication and empty-hand control techniques, which is a fancy way of saying all techniques that don’t involve any kind of weapon. So, What About Cattle Prods? Cattle prods are legal stun guns, as long as they are used only for the purpose of a deterrent against animals and are over a length of 480mm. Cattle prods must be used for cattle, to deter dog attacks and so on. It is illegal to use them on a person, or intended to be used on a person, as then they become a prohibited weapon in accordance with the Criminal Code of Canada. 10 Alternatives To Stun Guns You can read my comprehensive guide on the 10 best self defense tools you can carry, but I've given you a quick rundown below as well. Dog Spray Tactical Pen Personal Safety Alarms Security Umbrellas Diversion Water bottle Self-Defense Keychains Flashlights Apple AirTag GPS Watches with Safety Features Safety whistles 1. Dog Spray In Canada, it's illegal to tell a policeman that you're carrying pepper spray for self-defense. But, you can carry dog spray  to use against dogs, wildlife and (ahem) animals. Read our full guide on whether bear spray for self defense in Canada here . 2. Tactical Pen If you’re trapped in a car, you can break glass with a Tactical Pen (otherwise known as a windshield breaker). But it's illegal to carry this if you intend to use it as a weapon in Canada, so remember - you will only be carrying this on your person because it's a normal pen . For writing with ... for your exam. Read my full guide on the 10 best tactical pens here . 3. Personal Safety Alarms Personal alarms  let an extremely loud noise to draw attention to your situation and deter and disorient attackers. 4. Security Umbrellas City Safe Self Defense Umbrella A security umbrella , on the surface, appears and functions like any regular umbrella, offering the typical utility you'd expect. However, it's engineered with a robust frame and a steel tip for a forceful defensive response. 5. Diversion Water Bottle Hide your cash, cards, keys and those little treasures you don't want the world to find. And here's the best part: If needed, when filled with ice, it can serve as a makeshift defense tool. This bottle offers a smart, subtle way to keep your valuables secure while staying hydrated. 6. Self-defense keychains Self-defense keychains are compact, easy-to-carry devices designed for personal protection, either by striking an assailant or creating noise to draw attention. 7. Tactical Flashlights Your every day flashlight can be used as self-defense tool by shining it in an attacker's eyes to blind and disorient them. Flashlights are of course legal to carry in Canada, unlike many other self-defense tools. This means that you can have one on hand at all times in your bag without worrying about breaking the law. 8. Apple AirTag Although Apple’s AirTag is primarily designed to track personal items, it can also play a role in enhancing your personal safety. By discreetly placing an AirTag in your bag or attaching it to your keychain, you establish a covert connection between yourself and those closest to you. Your friends and family can then use the Find My app to effortlessly monitor your location while you're commuting or out for a jog. 9. GPS Watch GPS watches  are your guardian angel. A fusion of fitness and protection, they're the jogger's trusted companion as they track your location real-time. Fitbit Versa 4 Fitness Smart Watch 10. Safety whistles Safety whistles  in Canada is completely lawful. You can conveniently wear it around your neck or stash it in a handbag or pocket for easy access in case of emergencies. What Hurts More, a Stun Gun or Taser? A taser and a stun gun are similar in terms of the pain they cause to the attacker, but the taser has a greater ability to disrupt muscle movements and prevent an assailant from advancing towards you by paralyzing them. The effects of a taser last less than one hour. Stun gun effects are temporary and end once you stop pressing down the stun gun onto the attacker. Using the stun gun for ½ a second causes a moment of pain. Zapping one to two seconds causes muscle spasms and confusion. A zap that’s longer than three seconds disorients and causes great temporary pain to the attacker. Are Stun Guns Or Tasers Lethal? A taser shock can cause “cardiac arrest” and death, according to a 2012 study . Tasers can impair brain function such as causing reduced verbal learning and memory, but these effects last under an hour. The effects lasted, on average, less than one hour. A stun gun is not lethal but causes a significant amount of pain. There is no permanent damage from a stun gun. Do Stun Guns Go Through Clothes? Stun guns can penetrate clothing due to the high voltage electric shock placed directly on the attacker's body, but very heavy clothing (like thick jackets) will reduce the shock’s effectiveness. Does a Stun Gun Look The Same As A Taser? Tasers are pistol-shaped, whereas stun guns are small, handheld devices often found in the form of a torch. What Can I Carry As Self Defense? In Canada it's illegal to carry any weapon with the intention of self-defense. However, if you intend to (and just happen to) be carrying bear spray and you just happen to use it if you get attacked by another person, You can read the full guide on pepper spray and bear spray here for more info . Related articles: 5 Best Self-Defense Umbrellas 10 Best Self-Defense Gifts For Her 5 Best Tactical Flashlights For Self-Defense 10 Best Tactical Pens On Amazon (Canada Edition)