Search Results

24-year-old Taran Pandher, left, and 34-year-old Shahaib Abasi were gunned down in separate incidents nearly a week apart this month, but RCMP say both deaths were connected to the ongoing B.C. gang conflict. Photo by RCMP /PNG Two men known to police were shot dead in separate attacks in Langley and Burnaby less than a week apart. Investigators say the killings of 24-year-old Taran Pandher and 34-year-old Shahaib Abasi are connected to the ongoing B.C. gang conflict. Both murders were followed by burning vehicles, a hallmark of Metro Vancouver gang hits, and the homicide team is now appealing for witnesses and dashcam footage. Taxi Shooting in Langley On September 5, 2025, just before 10:30 p.m., Langley RCMP found Taran Pandher shot inside a taxi near 200 Street and 53 Avenue. Efforts to save him were unsuccessful. Roughly 30 minutes later, a vehicle was found burning near 132 Street and 64A Avenue in Surrey. Investigators believe it was connected to the killing. IHIT confirmed the homicide was targeted. Pandher was known to police. Burnaby Attack Outside McDonald’s On September 10, 2025, just before 5:30 p.m., Shahaib Abasi was fatally shot outside a McDonald’s near Still Creek Avenue and Still Creek Drive in Burnaby. About 15 minutes later, a white Mitsubishi RVR was discovered burning near Nursery Street and Lakefield Drive. Police are working to confirm its role in the attack. Abasi, a Surrey resident, had also been the subject of previous police attention. In May, officers stopped his Tesla and seized $45,000 in cash, bear mace, and two cellphones. The money later tested positive for traces of several illicit drugs and is now under civil forfeiture. IHIT says the Burnaby killing was also targeted and connected to the gang conflict. Pattern of Gang-Related Violence Both cases share common elements of Metro Vancouver gang violence: Victims known to police Shootings carried out in public Vehicles set on fire shortly after the attacks “The gang landscape is complex and fluid,” said IHIT Cpl. Sukhi Dhesi. “Those responsible showed a complete disregard for public safety.” Police Appeal for Witnesses IHIT is asking the public for dashcam or CCTV footage from the following areas on September 5, 2025: 20200 block of 53A Avenue, Langley, 9–11 p.m. 13250 block of 64A Avenue, Surrey, 10:30–11:30 p.m. 19900 block of 53 Avenue, Langley, 10–11 p.m. Anyone with information about the Burnaby or Langley shootings is asked to call 1-877-551-IHIT (4448)  or email ihitinfo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca .

Forensics investigators are seen at a residential building on Sept. 7, two days after the triple stabbing. (Dillon Hodgin/ CBC ) The lone survivor of the Sept 5 triple stabbing in East Vancouver has died in hospital, Vancouver police said Monday. Jinfeng Guan, 50, died Thursday. Police said they have notified Crown counsel and are submitting evidence for consideration of additional charges. Viet Quy John Ly, 54, was charged Sept 7 with two counts of second degree murder and one count of aggravated assault , and he remains in custody. Timeline Of East Vancouver Triple Stabbing: Sept 5 to now Sept 5: Police respond shortly before 2 p.m. to a stabbing call in Joyce-Collingwood. A 50-year-old woman is found with life-threatening injuries near Vanness Avenue and Spencer Street, and two women are found deceased in another building near Joyce Street and Vanness Avenue. Sept 6 +7: Vancouver police arrest a 54-year-old man and the B.C. Prosecution Service later approves two counts of second degree murder and one count of aggravated assault against Viet Quy John Ly, 54. Sept 11: The surviving victim, identified as Jinfeng Guan, 50, dies in hospital. Sept 15: Vancouver police announce Guan’s death and say evidence is being submitted to Crown counsel for consideration of additional charges. Sept 17: Canadian Press reporting notes interim bail was denied and the next Vancouver Provincial Court appearance is set for Sept 26. An apartment building at 3264 Vanness Ave. in Vancouver that was the site of a double homicide on Sept. 5. (Credit: Jason Payne) Who The Victims Are & The Accused Police identified the deceased victims as Jianghui Deng, 55, and Chunxiu Yin, 54. They were found in a residential building near Joyce Street and Vanness Avenue on Sept 5. Jinfeng Guan, 50, was found with life-threatening injuries in a separate building about two blocks away near Vanness Avenue and Spencer Street. She died in hospital on Sept 11. The accused is Viet Quy John Ly, 54. He was charged on Sept 7 with two counts of second degree murder and one count of aggravated assault, and remains in custody. Police say they have submitted evidence to Crown counsel to consider additional charges following Guan’s death. No additional or amended charges had been posted publicly as of Sept 17. Current Charges: What Could Change? Viet Quy John Ly is charged with two counts of second degree murder and one count of aggravated assault. Police say they have submitted evidence to Crown counsel to consider additional charges following Jinfeng Guan’s death. What Second Degree Murder Means in Canada All murder that is not first degree is classified as second degree under the Criminal Code. A conviction for first or second degree murder carries a mandatory life sentence. What Does Aggravated Assault Mean? Aggravated assault is defined as wounding, maiming, disfiguring, or endangering the life of the complainant, with a maximum penalty of 14 years. After a victim dies - how charges may be reassessed Crown prosecutors apply a two part test for charge approval and continue to reassess that test throughout a prosecution. New evidence, including a victim’s death, can lead Crown to amend or add charges if the evidentiary and public interest standards are met. East Vancouver Triple Stabbing: What Happens Next in Court Custody status and next date Viet Quy John Ly remains in custody after interim bail was denied . His next appearance is set for Sept 26 at Vancouver Provincial Court. How to check daily court lists BC posts daily court lists each morning that show scheduled appearances by accused name. You can search the provincial Daily Court Lists and Court Services Online on the morning of the hearing. If you need help now VictimLinkBC offers 24-7 confidential support and referrals for victims and witnesses in B.C. Call 911 if you are in immediate danger, or use the VPD non-emergency line for non-urgent reports. Stay safe. Related reading: Surrey Bear Creek Park Shooting Canada’s Most Dangerous Cities Two Fatal Shootings in Burnaby & Langley Tied to Gang Violence

When personal safety is on the line, lethal force isn’t always an option—but neither is being defenseless. That’s where Byrna non-lethal self-defense launchers come in. Unlike traditional firearms, Byrna launchers fire CO₂-powered kinetic, chemical, and pepper rounds to stop threats without the legal risks of a firearm. But not all Byrna launchers are built the same. Some pack more power, some are compact for everyday carry, and others are budget-friendly for home defense. In this guide, we break down the Byrna LE vs SD vs Mission 4 vs SE, what they do, and which one gives you the protection you need. What is a Byrna Self-Defense Launcher? A Byrna self-defense launcher is a CO₂-powered, non-lethal device designed to stop threats without deadly force. Unlike traditional firearms, Byrna launchers fire kinetic impact rounds, chemical irritants (like pepper spray), and tear gas projectiles to deter and incapacitate attackers from a safe distance. These launchers are commonly used for home defense, personal safety, and law enforcement training, offering a safe alternative to firearms while still delivering stopping power comparable to traditional self-defense tools. Byrna Le vs SD: Different Byrna Launchers Explained Byrna offers several models of launchers, each designed for different self-defense and law enforcement needs. While they share the same CO₂-powered system, projectile compatibility, and purpose, they have key differences in performance, features, and intended use. Feature Byrna Mission 4 Byrna TCR Byrna LE Byrna SD Magazine Capacity 19+19 rounds (38 total) 12+7 rounds (19 total) 8 rounds 5 rounds Muzzle Velocity 325 FPS 295 FPS 330 FPS 300 FPS Effective Range 100 feet 60 feet 60 feet 50 feet CO₂ Cartridge 88g (high capacity) 12g 8g 8g Best For Home defense, security, property protection Tactical training, security teams EDC defense, duty use Compact carry, personal defense The Mission 4  is the most powerful Byrna launcher available, offering the best stopping power, accuracy, and shot capacity. Here are all the models explained below: 1. Byrna SD (Self Defense) The Byrna SD (formerly Byrna HD) is the most popular model and a go-to choice for civilians looking for a compact, reliable self-defense launcher. Fires up to 60 feet with kinetic or chemical projectiles Semi-automatic firing with a 5-round magazine No permit required in most U.S. states Compatible with Byrna MAX, Kinetic, and Pepper rounds This model is perfect for home defense, personal carry, and travel, offering a balance of power and ease of use. 2. Byrna LE (Law Enforcement) The Byrna LE is the most advanced model in Byrna’s lineup, designed for law enforcement professionals and serious self-defense users. Higher muzzle velocity than the SD (up to 340 FPS vs. 300 FPS) Increased accuracy and range with a more refined trigger pull Improved grip and ergonomics for faster handling Still a non-lethal alternative, but with more force behind each shot For users who want the most power and accuracy, the Byrna LE is the best choice. 3.  Byrna Mission 4 Unlike the Byrna SD or LE, which are compact pistol-style launchers, the Mission 4 is a full-sized rifle designed for maximum effectiveness. Byrna’s most powerful and high-capacity launcher 19+19 round magazines (38 total) 100-foot effective range Best for home and property defense 4. Byrna TCR (Tactical Compact Rifle) For those looking for a home defense solution with more tactical capability, the Byrna TCR offers: Larger capacity magazines for extended engagement Carbine-style ergonomics for greater stability and control Upgraded CO₂ system for more consistent shot performance This model is best for homeowners, security professionals, and those who want a more intimidating presence for deterring intruders. How Does a Byrna Self-Defense Launcher Work? Unlike traditional firearms that rely on gunpowder and bullets, Byrna launchers use compressed CO₂ cartridges to fire projectiles. These projectiles can be kinetic impact rounds, chemical irritant rounds, or training rounds, giving users flexibility in how they defend themselves. The Mechanics of a Byrna Launcher A Byrna launcher operates similarly to a semi-automatic pistol, but instead of firing bullets, it uses .68 caliber projectiles powered by a CO₂ cartridge. Here’s how it works: 1️⃣ Load a CO₂ Cartridge – Byrna launchers use 8-gram CO₂ cartridges that provide consistent shot power. Once punctured, a single cartridge can fire 15-25 rounds, depending on the model. 2️⃣ Insert a Magazine – Magazines hold 5 to 7 rounds, depending on the model. Users can load kinetic, pepper, or training rounds depending on the situation. 3️⃣ Pull the Trigger – When fired, the CO₂ gas rapidly expands, propelling the projectile at speeds of 220-340 feet per second (FPS). Higher FPS means more impact force. 4️⃣ Projectile Impact – The round strikes the target, either causing a painful kinetic impact or releasing a chemical irritant to incapacitate the attacker. 5️⃣ Reload & Repeat – Users can quickly reload spare magazines or swap CO₂ cartridges for continuous self-defense capability. Types of Byrna Self-Defense Rounds Byrna launchers stand out because they fire a variety of non-lethal ammunition. Different projectiles offer unique tactical advantages depending on the situation. 🟠 Kinetic Rounds – Impact-Only, No Chemicals Solid plastic balls designed to cause painful blunt-force impact Effective for stopping an attacker without the use of chemicals Legal for self-defense even in areas where chemical rounds are restricted 🔴 Byrna MAX Projectiles - A powerful gas & pepper spray combo A combination of OC (Oleoresin Capsicum) pepper spray and CS tear gas Causes instant burning in the eyes, nose, and lungs Effects last 15-30 minutes, giving users time to escape 🟢 Byrna Pepper Rounds – Strong but Legal in More States Contains only OC pepper irritant without CS tear gas Legal in some areas where Byrna MAX rounds are restricted Provides temporary blindness, breathing difficulty, and disorientation 🔵 Byrna Eco-Kinetic Rounds – Training & Practice Biodegradable projectiles for safe outdoor training Lower cost per round, making them ideal for practice No chemical irritants, but still deliver a small impact 🏠 Byrna Pro Training Rounds – Inert & Reusable Identical in weight and size to live rounds but contain no chemicals Used for realistic self-defense training without cleanup Perfect for practice drills and learning proper aim Which Byrna Round is Right for You? 🔹 Home defense: Byrna MAX rounds provide the most stopping power. 🔹 Everyday carry: Pepper rounds give reliable defense without tear gas. 🔹 Training & accuracy practice: Eco-Kinetic or Pro Training rounds are ideal. 🔹 legal restrictions: Kinetic rounds work even where chemical rounds are banned. Must-Answer Questions for Byrna Self-Defense 1. Is the Byrna considered a firearm? USA No, the Byrna is not classified as a firearm under U.S. federal law. The ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives) has confirmed that Byrna launchers are not firearms because they do not use gunpowder, primers, or traditional ammunition. Instead, they rely on CO₂-powered projectiles. This means no background check is required to purchase one, unlike a traditional handgun. Some states and municipalities have restrictions on possession, transportation, or public carry, so check your local laws before use. Canada In Canada, Byrna launchers are classified as firearms under the Canadian Criminal Code, but they are exempt from licensing requirements because their firing velocity remains below 500 feet per second (150 meters per second). While Byrna launchers are technically legal to buy and own in Canada, Canadian law strictly prohibits carrying any weapon, including Byrna launchers, for the purpose of self-defense. Unlike in the U.S., self-defense laws in Canada do not justify the proactive carrying of weapons, even non-lethal ones. Possession of a Byrna launcher is generally restricted to home defense, and carrying one in public—whether concealed or openly—can lead to serious legal consequences under weapons possession laws. Moreover, intent matters under Canadian law. Even if an item is not technically prohibited, carrying it with the intent to use it as a weapon may violate Section 88 of the Criminal Code, which prohibits possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose. This applies to items like bear spray, tactical flashlights, and even everyday objects like canes, if carried with the intent of self-defense. 2. Do I need a permit or background check to own a Byrna? No federal permit is required to own a Byrna launcher, but some state and local regulations apply. California, New York, and Washington D.C. have specific restrictions that may require a special license or ban certain projectiles. International buyers should also check local laws, as some countries classify CO₂-powered self-defense weapons as restricted devices. 3. Where can I legally carry my Byrna launcher? In most U.S. states, Byrna launchers can be carried without a permit. However, some states restrict carrying in public, especially if the launcher resembles a real firearm. Schools, government buildings, and airports often prohibit Byrna devices. International restrictions vary, with Canada, Australia, and parts of Europe banning CO₂-powered launchers entirely. 4. How should I maintain and store my Byrna launcher? Store in a dry, temperature-controlled environment to prevent CO₂ cartridge leaks. Check the launcher monthly for pressure loss or mechanical issues. Clean the barrel and chamber after firing chemical projectiles to prevent residue buildup. 5. Are there any travel restrictions with a Byrna launcher? Checked Baggage Only – Most airlines prohibit carrying Byrna launchers in carry-on luggage but may allow them in checked bags. CO₂ Cartridges & Chemical Rounds Are Restricted – Airlines and international customs often prohibit pressurized gas cartridges and chemical projectiles. State & Country Laws Differ – Some states ban launchers outright, while others allow possession but restrict transportation. 6. Is the Byrna launcher available in different colors? Yes! Byrna launchers are available in multiple colors for legal compliance and personalization. Some states require less-lethal weapons to be distinguishable from firearms. Black / Gray / Tan – Tactical, discreet appearance. Safety Orange / Yellow – Reduces risk of misidentification by law enforcement. 7. Can I leave my Byrna loaded? Yes, but CO₂ cartridges should not remain punctured for extended periods. Byrna recommends replacing CO₂ cartridges every 6-12 months to ensure pressure retention. Leaving a punctured CO₂ cartridge in for too long can lead to leaks and reduced performance. 💡 Pro Tip:  Keep an extra unpunctured CO₂ cartridge in your bag or holster for quick swaps. 8. How long will a CO₂ cartridge last in a Byrna? Unpunctured: Can last years if stored properly. Once punctured: A CO₂ cartridge holds pressure for 24-48 hours, after which it may leak. After firing: A full CO₂ cartridge lasts for 15-20 shots before needing replacement. 9. What is the most powerful Byrna gun? The Byrna LE (Law Enforcement Edition) is the most powerful model, firing at 350 FPS—higher than the standard SD model. It also holds 7 rounds per magazine, compared to 5 rounds in other models. Designed for maximum stopping power and accuracy in self-defense situations. Final Thoughts on Byrna Self-Defense Byrna launchers provide an effective, non-lethal self-defense option without the legal complexities of firearms. Whether you choose the Byrna SD, LE, EP, or TCR, you get reliable personal protection with the ability to deter attackers at a safe distance. ✅ For maximum stopping power: Byrna LE + Byrna MAX projectiles. ✅ For budget-friendly defense: Byrna SD with standard kinetic rounds. ✅ For tactical use: Byrna TCR with high-capacity magazines. Before purchasing, always check local laws and train with your Byrna launcher to be fully prepared for self-defense situations. Want More Non-Lethal Self-Defense Tips? Check out: Best Byrna Gun On Amazon Can You Carry a Byrna Gun in California? Byrna Gun Wounds: First Aid Guide

Police are seen in Delta on Saturday September 20, 2025. (CityNews Image) Delta, B.C.  — A 17-year-old male remains in hospital with serious injuries following a targeted shooting in Delta on Friday evening. Delta Shooting Investigation The Delta Police Department said officers were dispatched at approximately 8:15 p.m. on September 19, 2025, to reports of gunfire in the 900 block of English Bluff Road, near Fred Gingell Park. The victim, identified only as a teenager from another Lower Mainland community, was travelling with a group of high school students on a party bus. The bus had made a stop at the park when the shooting occurred. Police confirmed the teen was struck by gunfire and transported to hospital. His injuries were described as serious. Investigation Investigators believe the incident was targeted. No arrests have been made. A newer model silver or grey Toyota Camry was seen fleeing the area shortly after the shooting. Detectives are seeking any dashcam or CCTV footage that may show the vehicle or suspects. Police have conducted door-to-door canvassing in the surrounding neighbourhood as part of their investigation. Anyone with information is asked to contact the Delta Police Department at 604-946-4444 or email tips@deltapolice.ca . Police Statements In a statement released on Saturday, the Delta Police confirmed the victim was not from Delta and that the shooting took place while the group was visiting. Authorities emphasized that the case is under active investigation. Community and Context The shooting took place near Fred Gingell Park, a public area overlooking the Tsawwassen bluffs. Police said there was no indication of risk to the wider public beyond the targeted incident. According to Delta Police crime reporting data, the municipality has generally recorded lower violent crime rates compared to other Metro Vancouver jurisdictions. However, targeted incidents, while less frequent, have occurred in past years. Current Status Victim: 17-year-old male, serious injuries, hospital care. Suspect vehicle: silver or grey newer model Toyota Camry. Police activity: canvassing, collecting video, ongoing investigation. Public appeal: witnesses and anyone with footage urged to come forward. The investigation remains active, and no further details about suspects or motive have been released.

Vancouver, BC – During a recent court hearing, Martin Charest, the inmate who fatally assaulted convicted serial killer Robert Pickton, testified in court. He pleaded guilty to murder, stating his actions were not for himself but for those Pickton had harmed. Martin Charest's Testimony On Thursday, Charest admitted to using a broken broom handle to assault Pickton at the Port-Cartier federal penitentiary in May 2024. He expressed “no remorse” and asserted that his motive was to bring some form of justice for Pickton’s numerous victims. “I know that we can’t take justice into our own hands, but I killed him for the victims, not for myself,” Charest told the court. Background: Pickton’s Crimes & Death Robert Pickton was convicted in 2007 of six counts of second-degree murder for crimes committed at his pig farm in Port Coquitlam, British Columbia. You can read my full guide on him here . While he was originally charged with many more murders, additional charges were stayed after his life sentence was imposed. On May 19, 2024, Charest attacked Pickton in prison using part of a broken broom handle. Pickton was airlifted to hospital but succumbed to his injuries on May 31, 2024, at the age of 74. Serial killer Robert Pickton, shown here during his murder trial in 2006, was fatally assaulted at the Port-Cartier federal penitentiary in May 2024. (Jane Wolsack/The Canadian Press) The Concept of Vigilante Justice Charest's actions raise important questions about vigilante justice. He claims his motive was retribution on behalf of victims. This courtroom statement forces us to consider how motives are treated when violence occurs behind bars. Is it ever justifiable to take the law into your own hands? When does seeking justice cross the line into unlawful behavior? These are complex questions that society must grapple with. The Impact on Victims' Families The families of Pickton's victims have endured unimaginable pain. They sought justice through the legal system, but many felt it failed them. Charest's actions may resonate with some who believe that true justice was never served. For the families, the question remains: does this act of violence provide closure, or does it open old wounds? The emotional toll is significant, and the impact of such actions can ripple through communities. Legal Implications of Vigilante Actions Charest’s case also highlights the legal ramifications of vigilante justice. While he may feel justified, the law does not typically condone taking matters into one’s own hands. In Canada, the legal system is designed to handle crimes and punish offenders. When individuals act outside of this system, they risk facing severe consequences. Charest now faces a life sentence for his actions, despite his claims of acting for the victims. Public Perception of Justice Public opinion on vigilante justice varies widely. Some view it as a necessary response to a flawed system, while others see it as dangerous and counterproductive. The Pickton case has sparked debates about the effectiveness of the justice system. Are there gaps that need addressing? How can we ensure that victims and their families feel heard and supported? Conclusion: A Call for Reflection The tragic events surrounding Robert Pickton and Martin Charest compel us to reflect on justice, morality, and the law. While Charest may have acted out of a sense of duty to the victims, his actions have led to further violence and legal consequences. As we consider the implications of this case, let’s remember the importance of advocating for a justice system that truly serves all. We must strive for a society where victims feel supported and justice is pursued through lawful means. In the end, the question remains: how can we balance the need for justice with the rule of law? It's a conversation worth having, especially in the context of personal safety and security.

Robert Pickton, also known as the "Pig Farmer Killer," is one of the most infamous Canadian serial killers that used Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside as his hunting ground. In the late 1990s, more and more women vanished from that area, but despite numerous tip offs, the Vancouver Police Department have since admitted to “botching” the case and failing to act fast enough. Robert Pickton The heinous crimes Pickton committed on his farm in Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, not only led to his conviction but also exposed a shocking lack of attention to the plight of Indigenous women who had gone missing. Let’s examine the case of Robert Pickton and delve into the mind of a psychopathic killer. Read: Robert Pickton Attacked In Prison & Speared In The Head Quick Answers: Downtown Eastside: Pickton’s Hunting Ground Timeline of Criminal Events Robert Pickton's Farm Robert Pickton's Mother: A Disturbed Childhood Robert Pickton's Brother: A Complicit Accomplice? Arrest And Trial Details Is Robert Pickton A Psychopath? Robert Pickton Documentary Robert Pickton's Net Worth Downtown Eastside, Vancouver Downtown Eastside: Pickton’s Hunting Ground Robert Pickton was a pig farmer who lived on a sprawling, dilapidated estate. The rundown barns and slaughterhouses provided an ideal façade for a deranged individual who murdered 49 women and fed their remains to his pigs or disposed of them at the local landfill. Pickton would pick his victims around the Downtown Eastside area. He became acquainted with the area by frequenting a rendering plant situated in the area where he would discard animal waste. He would drive along the ten-block stretch known as the Low Track, proposition women with cash and drugs and then drive them to his farm. The police launched an investigation in 2002 after several women went missing in the area, and they eventually focused on Pickton as the prime suspect. In 2004, the police raided his property, and during their search, they found DNA evidence from at least 33 women. The remains of six women were also found on the farm. Despite refusing to confess to police, Pickton was ultimately caught when an undercover officer was placed in his cell. In a moment of disturbing candor, Pickton boasted about his killings, methods of disposing of the bodies, and expressed regret at not achieving his goal of 50 murders, claiming that he had become careless. Timeline of Criminal Events In 1991, Robert Pickton was charged with attempted murder after he stabbed a prostitute named Wendy Lynn Eistetter. In 1997, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) began investigating Pickton and his brother David for the disappearance of several women from Vancouver's Downtown Eastside. In 2002, police obtained a search warrant for Pickton's farm in Port Coquitlam, where they discovered the remains and belongings of many missing women. In 2007, Pickton was convicted of the murders of six women and was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for 25 years. The Farm Robert Pickton's Farm The crime scene, Robert Pickton's pig farm, was located in Port Coquitlam, British Columbia. After his parents died, Pickton and his siblings sold the majority of the property for urban development, reducing the farm to 6.5 hectares. The farm was a well-known hangout spot for prostitutes and drug addicts. According to The Guardian , the police were given numerous tip-offs about Pickton. “Wayne Leng, a friend of another of the missing women, Sarah de Vries, says he had an anonymous tip that a prostitute who had visited the farm had spotted a number of women's identification cards among Pickton's possessions. He said he also passed this tip on to the police, with no apparent result,” says The Guardian. According to reports, the farm was filthy, with piles of garbage and animal carcasses scattered around. Pickton was known to have used the farm to dispose of the remains of his victims. Robert Pickton's Mother: A Disturbed Childhood Helen Louise Pickton, Robert's mother, was known to be abusive and controlling. Her influence on Pickton's disturbed childhood has been cited as a possible factor that contributed to his psychopathic tendencies. Pickton and his siblings’ life was “ brutal and difficult ” and his father was largely emotionally absent and not involved in raising the children. Louise expected the children to work almost all hours outside of school to slop pigs and attend to the far work. One anecdote in particular summarizes Pickton’s childhood. According to “On The Farm” by Stevie Cameron, when Robert was little he used to “crawl into the carcasses of gutted hogs to hide from people who were angry with him.” Robert Pickton's Brother: A Complicit Accomplice? Dave Pickton, Robert's younger brother, was a co-owner of the pig farm and lived on the property with Robert. Although he was never charged with murder, he was charged with several counts of being an accessory after the fact. The police suspected that Dave was aware of his brother's actions but chose to remain silent. In an interview with CBC News, Dave denied any involvement in the murders. He “had “no idea” sex workers were visiting his family's property and murdered and he disputes the accusation that he ever helped his brother cover up his crimes. Arrest And Trial Details Robert Pickton was arrested on February 22, 2002, and charged with two counts of first-degree murder and was convicted for the murders of Marnie Frey, Mona Wilson, Andrea Joesbury, Sereena Abotsway, Brenda Wolfe and Georgina Papin. The investigation quickly grew as three more charges were added two months later, followed by three more after a few days, and an additional four in both September and October. Forensic analysis proved difficult as the bodies were severely mutilated and in advanced stages of decomposition. It was also rumored that he fed the bodies directly to his pigs and even mixed the human flesh with the pork which he sold to the public, although these are allegations only. On January 30, 2006, Pickton's trial began where he pleaded not guilty to 27 murders. Justice Williams divided the charges into two categories: one group of six counts and another of twenty counts. One of the 27 counts was rejected due to a lack of evidence. On December 9, 2007, the jury found Pickton guilty of six counts of second-degree murder. Judge James Williams sentenced him to life in prison, with no possibility of parole for 25 years, which is the maximum punishment you can receive for second-degree murder. There were later attempts to charge him with the deaths of another 20 women, but a second trial was eventually canceled as the charges would not add any more time to his sentence, given that Pickton was already serving the maximum sentence under the law. Is Robert Pickton A Psychopath? Pickton was diagnosed with psychopathy, a personality disorder characterized by a lack of empathy, a disregard for the rights of others and a tendency toward criminal behavior. Experts say that psychopathy is a complex disorder that can be influenced by both genetics and environmental factors. In Pickton’s case, it is believed that his upbringing and his family's history of criminal behavior may have contributed to his psychopathy. Robert Pickton Documentary: An Eerie Insight into the Mind of a Killer The documentary, “The Pig Farm,” is an award-winning 2011 documentary that investigates the reasons why it took police so many years to convict Pickton despite numerous tip offs. The documentary is not available on Netflix, but on Amazon Prime . Robert Pickton’s Net Worth Robert Pickton’s net worth is unknown. Related Articles: 7 Best Self-Defense Classes For Women Can A Sociopath Be Faithful In A Relationship? Can You Go To Jail For Self-Defense In Canada?

Winnipeg ranks as Canada’s most violent city, based on a February 2025 study by the Fraser Institute. A February 2025 report from the Fraser Institute identifies Winnipeg as Canada’s most violent city. The study examined crime data from 2019 to 2022 across all Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) with populations over 100,000. Canada Crime Rates: Violent Offenses Across Major Cities Between 2019 and 2022, violent crime rates - including homicide, robbery, and aggravated assault - were significantly higher in Western Canada compared to Quebec. Winnipeg topped the list with 675 violent crimes per 100,000 residents, more than double the national average of 262. Other high-ranking cities included Thunder Bay (611), Regina (519), Saskatoon (470), Lethbridge (442), and Edmonton (418). Among Canada’s five largest metropolitan areas, Calgary ranked 11th overall, recording the highest violent crime rate in that group. Vancouver (16th), Montreal (18th), and Toronto (24th) followed. Several cities reported rates close to the national urban average: Brantford (278), London (271), Halifax (259), Vancouver (250), and St. John’s (239). The lowest rates were found in Quebec and Ontario cities. Sherbrooke (102), Québec City, Barrie (125), and Guelph (127) reported the lowest levels of violent crime, along with St. Catharines-Niagara (147) and Belleville (152). Property Crime The study also found property crime to be concentrated in Western cities, while Quebec urban centers consistently reported much lower levels. Lethbridge, Alberta, had the highest rate nationwide at 5,521 incidents per 100,000 people, more than double the national urban average of 2,513. Kelowna (4,778) and Regina (4,496) followed. Vancouver (3,885) ranked sixth overall and led among Canada’s largest cities, with Calgary (3,591) close behind. Other cities with above-average rates included Abbotsford-Mission (3,515), Thunder Bay (3,370), and Saskatoon (3,220). Mid-range cities such as London (3,136), Victoria (2,879), and Moncton (2,913) hovered above or near the national average. Cities slightly below included Halifax (2,527), Brantford (2,471), and St. John’s (2,140). Quebec cities recorded the lowest property crime: Québec City (925), Saguenay (1,057), and Sherbrooke (1,172). Other low-crime areas included Trois-Rivières (1,335), Saint John (1,452), and Montreal (1,514). Canada vs. the U.S. The study also compared Canadian crime to American trends. From 2014 to 2022, Canada’s violent crime rate rose by 43.8%, reaching 434.1 per 100,000 people - about 14% higher than the U.S. rate. Property crime in CThe study also compared Canadian crime to American trends. From 2014 to 2022, Canada’s violent crime rate rose by 43.8%, reaching 434.1 per 100,000 people - about 14% higher than the U.S. rate.anada is also now 27.5% higher than in the U.S. Although overall levels remain historically low, the Fraser Institute warns the upward trend is a concern for policymakers and the public. Related reading: Vancouver Crime  Rate: Areas To Avoid What City Has The Worst Crime  Rate in Canada? 10 Self Defense Tools You Can Legally Carry In Canada

The term Castle Doctrine  often appears in American news. It's the idea that your home is your castle and you have the right to use force, even deadly force, to defend it from intruders. Canada does not have a Castle Doctrine. Here, the Criminal Code sets a different standard. You can protect yourself, your family, and your property, but only if the force you use is considered reasonable for the situation. In practice, that means if someone breaks into your home without a weapon, you cannot respond with deadly force. This difference has fueled debate about whether Canada should copy the U.S. model. Some argue for stronger legal protection for homeowners, while others believe the current limits are necessary to prevent misuse. So what does Canadian law actually allow when you defend your home and family? Self-Defense in Canada vs. the U.S. Castle Doctrine Where American Castle Doctrine laws often shield homeowners automatically, Canadian courts judge each case individually. Instead of presuming deadly force is justified, judges and juries look at whether your actions were proportionate to the threat, whether other options were available, and how immediate the danger was. This means Canadians do not have the same automatic legal protection that many Americans do. Every confrontation is tested against the standard of reasonableness, which makes outcomes less predictable but also prevents a blanket right to extreme force. How Canadian Self-Defense Law Works Canadian law on self-defense is found mainly in Section 34 and Section 35 of the Criminal Code . These sections cover defending yourself, other people, and your property. The core rule is that your actions must always be reasonable for the situation. Section 34: Defending Yourself or Others You can use force if you believe someone is using, or about to use, force against you or another person. Your actions must be taken to protect yourself or others. The response must be reasonable, based on the circumstances. Courts look at factors such as: Was the threat immediate? Did the other person have a weapon? Did you have other options besides fighting back? How serious was the danger? Section 35: Defending Property You can use force to stop someone from entering, taking, or damaging your property. You must believe you have the right to that property. Again, the force has to be reasonable. Importantly, you cannot use deadly force to protect property alone. Lethal action is only allowed if you reasonably believe your life, or someone else’s life, is in immediate danger. Difference Between Reasonable vs Not Reasonable Force Canadian courts expect your response to match the threat. For example, if an unarmed intruder enters your home, physically pushing them out or holding them until police arrive would likely be considered reasonable. If the intruder has a weapon, using objects around you to block or protect yourself could also fall within the law, as long as your response is limited to stopping the threat. By contrast, shooting an unarmed person who is only trying to steal property would almost certainly not be seen as reasonable. The same goes for attacking someone after they are already fleeing, or using deadly force when your life or safety is not actually at risk. In these situations, the law would see your actions as excessive. Castle Doctrine Canada: 3 Self-Defense Cases That Shaped the Debate Ali Mian – Milton, Ontario (2023) Ali Mian, 21, of Milton, Ont., shakes hands with his lawyer, Jag Virk, after a second-degree murder charge against him was dropped in court on Monday. (Submitted by Jag Virk) In February 2023, 22-year-old Ali Mian woke to find several armed men breaking into his Milton, Ontario home. The intruders physically assaulted his mother, and Mian, who was a licensed gun owner, fired his handgun and killed one of them. Police charged him with second-degree murder. After reviewing the evidence, the Crown later withdrew the charge, stating there was no reasonable prospect of conviction because his actions could be understood as self-defense. This case showed that when intruders are armed and a family member is under direct attack, Canadian courts may accept deadly force as reasonable. Peter Khill – Hamilton area, Ontario (2016 incident, conviction upheld 2023) Peter Khill was convicted for manslaughter in the shooting death of Jonathan Styres of Six Nations of the Grand River in 2016. In 2016, Peter Khill noticed someone trying to break into his truck outside his rural home. He went outside with a shotgun and confronted 29-year-old Jon Styres, an Indigenous man who was unarmed. Khill fired two shots, killing him. A jury later convicted Khill of manslaughter, and he was sentenced to eight years in prison, which was later reduced to six on appeal. In 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada declined to hear further appeal, leaving the conviction in place. This case highlighted that using deadly force against someone outside the home, especially if they are unarmed, can be judged as disproportionate and as a criminal act. Gerald Stanley – Rural Saskatchewan (2016 incident, verdict 2018) Colten Boushie, left, was fatally shot in August 2016. Gerald Stanley, right, was acquitted of second-degree murder in the death of Boushie. (Facebook/Liam Richards/Canadian Press) Another high-profile case unfolded in Saskatchewan. In 2016, farmer Gerald Stanley shot and killed 22-year-old Colten Boushie, a Cree man, who had driven onto his property with friends. Stanley argued that the shooting was accidental and that he had fired in self-defense while trying to protect his family and property. In 2018, a jury found him not guilty of both second-degree murder and manslaughter. The verdict sparked national debate and protests, raising questions about race, rural property rights, and how self-defense laws are applied. How to Defend Yourself Without Breaking the Law Canadian law does not allow you to carry firearms or most weapons for personal protection. But there are legal and effective ways to increase your safety at home and in daily life. Wildlife spray : Carrying bear spray or dog (coyote) deterrent spray is legal when used for its intended purpose. While it cannot be marketed as a self-defense weapon, many Canadians keep it on hand for outdoor use. It can also help in emergencies when facing a real threat. Alarms and noise deterrents: Personal alarms or air horns draw attention quickly, which is often enough to scare off an intruder. Loud noise is one of the simplest and safest defenses. Home security basics: Simple steps like better locks, motion lights, and doorbell cameras can reduce risk and provide evidence if something happens. Martial arts training: Learning a martial art like jiu-jitsu gives you practical self-defense skills that do not rely on weapons. Even a few basic moves can help you escape from holds, break free if grabbed, or use leverage against someone larger. Tactical flashlights: A strong flashlight with a strobe setting can disorient an attacker long enough for you to get away. These devices are completely legal and double as everyday tools for the home or outdoors. Together, these options give you ways to protect yourself and your family while staying within the law. They focus on prevention, deterrence, and non-lethal defense, which Canadian courts are more likely to view as reasonable. All Your Questions Answered On Castle Doctrine Canada Does Canada have a Castle Doctrine? No. Unlike many U.S. states, Canada does not have a Castle Doctrine law. Instead, the Criminal Code requires that any force you use in self-defense is reasonable and proportionate to the threat. Can you use lethal force to defend property in Canada? No. Deadly force is only justified if you reasonably believe your life or someone else’s life is in immediate danger. Protecting property alone does not allow for lethal force. Do you have to retreat if someone breaks into your home in Canada? No. Canadian law does not impose a legal duty to retreat from your home. However, courts may consider whether you had the option to avoid using force when judging if your actions were reasonable. What counts as reasonable force under Canadian law? Reasonable force is measured by whether your actions matched the threat. For example, pushing out an unarmed intruder may be reasonable, while shooting someone who is not armed or threatening your life would not be.

Vancouver, B.C. – September 20, 2025  — One person was taken to hospital after a crash in East Vancouver Friday night, according to the Provincial Health Services Authority (PHSA). Emergency Response at 41st and Rupert Emergency crews were called to the intersection of East 41st Avenue and Rupert Street just after 8 p.m. on September 19.PHSA confirmed that two ambulances were dispatched to the scene. “Paramedics provided emergency medical treatment for one patient at the scene and transported one patient to hospital,” PHSA media relations told CityNews 1130. Injuries Not Yet Confirmed The extent of the person’s injuries has not been released. PHSA said no further details were available as of Saturday morning. CityNews reported that some calls to its newsroom suggested the incident may have involved a pedestrian, but that detail has not been confirmed. Police Contacted for More Information The Vancouver Police Department (VPD) has been contacted for additional information. As of publication time, VPD has not released a statement on the cause of the crash, whether any vehicles were involved, or if traffic violations contributed. Key Takeaways When:  Friday, Sept. 19, 2025, just after 8 p.m. Where:  East 41st Avenue and Rupert Street, East Vancouver Response:  Two ambulances dispatched, one patient treated and taken to hospital Status:  Injuries not confirmed; police investigating Related reading: Surrey Bear Creek Park Shooting Canada’s Most Dangerous Cities Two Fatal Shootings in Burnaby & Langley Tied to Gang Violence

A woman was punched in the face in an unprovoked assault while waiting for a bus in North Vancouver last week on September 19th. What Happened on Marine Drive That Morning North Vancouver RCMP say the assault happened on Friday, September 19, 2025, around 5:30 a.m. The woman and her partner were standing at a bus stop on the northwest corner of Marine Drive and Bewicke Avenue. A man crossed the street and, without warning, punched her in the face. The victim was injured but did not need to be taken to hospital. The suspect fled before officers arrived. Despite patrols and a canvass of nearby CCTV, police were unable to locate him. The unprovoked attack is now being investigated as part of an ongoing North Vancouver assault case. Who Police Are Looking For Investigators have released a description of the suspect. He is described as: Male About five feet tall Thin build Shoulder-length hair Wearing a grey hoodie and black jeans RCMP Appeal in North Vancouver Assault Investigation RCMP are asking for anyone who was in the area between 5:15 a.m. and 5:45 a.m. to come forward. They are especially interested in dash cam or surveillance video that may have captured the suspect. Anyone with information is asked to call North Vancouver RCMP at 604-985-1311 and quote file number 25-19906. Why Commuters Are Paying Attention The attack happened at a busy transit stop along Marine Drive, an area used by early morning riders. The suspect remains unidentified, leaving open questions about who he is and whether he may strike again. For many people, the thought of being targeted at random while waiting for a bus highlights how quickly routine moments can turn unsafe. The Numbers Behind North Vancouver Crime According to the most recently publicized crime statistics for the City of North Vancouver, the overall crime severity index fell by 5.4% in 2024. However, the violent crime severity index rose by 20.8% over the same period. These 2024 figures are the most current local data available.

You are walking home in Vancouver at night. Police patrols are scarce, response times feel slow, and the SkyTrain platform can feel empty when you need it most. Now Ottawa’s Canada gun buyback program is beginning, and even the federal Public Safety Minister was caught on tape saying municipal police do not have the resources to enforce it. He’s not the only one. Police chiefs across Canada have warned the program would overwhelm forces already stretched thin. The Ontario Provincial Police have refused to take part, and provinces like Alberta and Saskatchewan have passed laws to block their officers from being used. The federal government insists the buyback will go ahead, but the unresolved question for Vancouver is: will it come at the cost of local safety? What Exactly Is the Canada Gun Buyback Program - and Does It Target the Guns Used in Crime? In May 2020, Ottawa banned more than 1,500 models of assault-style firearms, including AR-15s and Ruger Mini-14s. Bill C-21, passed in December 2023, gave the ban teeth by creating the Canada gun buyback program. The idea is simple: owners surrender their prohibited firearms in exchange for set compensation, ranging from just over $1,300 for an AR-15 to more than $6,000 for certain Swiss Arms rifles. A pilot for individuals began in Nova Scotia in September 2025, and British Columbia is expected to join in 2026. But here’s the catch: most guns used in violent crime in Canada are not these rifles. National statistics show nearly half involve handguns — and those aren’t part of the buyback. Even Police Chiefs Say They Do Not Have the Resources - So Who Will Enforce It? The loudest warnings about the Canada gun buyback program have come from police themselves. The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police has said plainly the buyback would be an “administrative burden” on officers already struggling to meet demand. Regina Police Chief Evan Bray called it “a massive amount of work.” The Ontario Provincial Police have declined to participate altogether. And in September 2025, Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree was recorded saying: “Let’s be frank about this: I just don’t think municipal police services have the resources to [enforce] this.” He later walked the comment back in Parliament, calling it “misguided.” But for residents who already feel police are absent when needed most, the remark reinforced a suspicion: if the minister doesn’t believe the buyback can be enforced, who will? If Officers Handle Buyback Duties, Who’s Left on Vancouver’s Streets? In Vancouver, the concern is not just about whether the Canada gun buyback program works. It is about whether it makes the city feel less safe. Police are already stretched with calls about assaults, street disorder, and late-night disturbances downtown. Women riding the SkyTrain report harassment and unwanted contact, often with no officer nearby. Every officer reassigned to handle buyback paperwork or weapon collection is one less officer visible on Granville Street on a Friday night. The Vancouver Police Department has not confirmed how it will be involved once the program reaches B.C. in 2026. Without new federal funding, the choices are stark: use local officers, rely on RCMP detachments, or contract out. Until Ottawa clarifies, the uncertainty fuels concern that resources could be pulled away from frontline patrols. For Women in Vancouver, Safety Concerns Go Beyond Firearms For women in Vancouver, the debate feels immediate. Violent crime with firearms is rare compared to other offences, but safety concerns persist. Transit Police data show most sex-related offences on SkyTrain lines involve harassment or unwanted touching. Vancouver Police reports list assaults and robberies as among the most common street-level crimes. Nationally, nearly half of all firearm-related violent crime involves handguns. In Toronto, where tracing is more robust, police say most of those handguns are smuggled from the U.S. rather than owned by licensed Canadians. Vancouver doesn’t release comparable tracing data, leaving residents in the dark about how many local crimes involve legally owned versus illicit guns. For women, that gap matters less than the basics: whether police will be on the street, in transit stations, and ready to respond when they need them. That is why the buyback debate resonates here — not as an abstract policy, but as a question of visible safety. Why Provinces Like Alberta and Saskatchewan Are Refusing to Help The resource question around the Canada gun buyback program has become political. Alberta passed its own firearms law in 2022, making it clear its officers will not enforce the federal buyback. Saskatchewan followed with similar legislation. Both argue the program unfairly targets lawful owners while leaving the problem of smuggled guns unresolved. British Columbia hasn’t taken that line. But the concerns raised by other provinces echo in Vancouver: if Ottawa expects local police to carry the burden without providing funding, it could weaken patrols in communities already pressing for more visible policing. The federal government has extended the amnesty for prohibited firearms until March 1, 2026, and set aside $742 million for compensation. What remains unclear is whether any of that funding will cover the cost of police enforcement. 4 Questions Vancouver Residents Should Be Asking About the Buyback As the buyback moves from pilot to full rollout, here are the key questions Vancouver residents should watch: 1. Who will enforce it?  Municipal police, RCMP detachments, or third-party contractors? 2. Will Ottawa pay?  Or will enforcement be added to local police workloads without extra resources? 3. How much funding will B.C. get?  Of the $742 million budget, how much will actually flow to the province? 4. What happens to patrols?  Will buyback duties mean fewer officers downtown and on transit? The answers will shape whether the program enhances safety or leaves Vancouver residents with fewer police where they feel they need them most. The Real Issue for Vancouver: Will Police Still Show Up When You Call? The federal Canada gun buyback program is meant to remove assault-style firearms from circulation, but in Vancouver the real worry is about what gets lost in the process. Police leaders across Canada say their forces are stretched too thin, and provinces are refusing to participate. The federal minister himself admitted as much in private. For Vancouver, the question isn’t whether the program works on paper — it’s whether an officer will still be there the next time someone calls for help on a SkyTrain platform or a downtown street. Until Ottawa explains how enforcement will be handled, that uncertainty is at the heart of the buyback debate.

The list of guns banned in Canada now includes hundreds of rifles. Supporters call them military-style weapons that threaten public safety. Critics argue many are ordinary hunting rifles caught in a political fight. Five models stand out in the debate. Each has been linked to campus shootings, mass killings, or ongoing controversy. Their history, design, and video evidence of how they fire raise the question of whether they belong in the field or should be banned outright. Guns Banned in Canada: Hunting Rifles or Assault Weapons? You Watch and Decide 1. Ruger Mini-14 – From Polytechnique to Nova Scotia In 1989, a gunman used a Ruger Mini-14 at Montreal’s École Polytechnique to kill 14 women. Decades later, the same rifle appeared in the 2020 Nova Scotia rampage, one of the deadliest mass shootings in Canadian history. The Mini-14 is a semi-automatic rifle chambered in .223 caliber, the same round used in many AR-15s. In Canada, it is limited to five rounds per magazine. It has long been sold as a “ranch rifle” for controlling coyotes or varmints, yet it can also fire rapidly with minimal recoil. Supporters of the ban argue that its history in attacks against women makes it too dangerous for civilian use. Critics counter that among the guns banned in Canada, the Mini-14 is one of the most disputed because it looks and functions like an ordinary hunting rifle. 2. Beretta Cx4 Storm – Dawson College’s Campus Shooting In 2006, a gunman carried a Beretta Cx4 Storm into Dawson College in Montreal, killing one student and injuring 19 others. The Cx4 Storm is a semi-automatic carbine chambered in 9mm pistol ammunition. In Canada, it is restricted to 10-round magazines. Lightweight and easy to handle, it has a futuristic appearance that makes it stand out from traditional rifles. For supporters of the ban, the Storm represents a tactical-style weapon with no hunting purpose. Critics note that it fires the same ammunition as many handguns and argue that banning it is based more on appearance than function. 3. AR-15 – The School Shooter’s Weapon of Choice The AR-15 has become the most infamous rifle linked to school shootings. In the U.S., variants were used at Sandy Hook, Parkland, and Uvalde. In Canada, an AR-15 variant, the Colt LE6940, was carried during the 2020 Nova Scotia attacks. This rifle is semi-automatic, chambered in .223/5.56 caliber, and accepts detachable magazines, though Canadian law limits it to five rounds. It is lightweight, accurate, and highly customizable. Military forces worldwide use similar rifles in select-fire versions. The government describes it as a battlefield weapon that should not be in civilian hands. Within the broader list of guns banned in Canada, the AR-15 is the most internationally recognized symbol of an assault-style rifle. Owners argue that AR-15s were already restricted in Canada to shooting ranges and rarely appeared in crimes before the ban. 4. M14 / M305 – The Military Classic in Civilian Hands In 2014, a gunman in Moncton, New Brunswick, used an M14 rifle to kill three RCMP officers. The Norinco M305, a low-cost clone of the M14, was especially popular among Canadian hunters. The M14 is a semi-automatic rifle chambered in .308 (7.62 NATO). It is heavier and more powerful than an AR-15, capable of hunting large game such as moose. In Canada, magazines are limited to five rounds. Supporters of the ban point to its role in the Moncton tragedy and its military origins. Critics argue it is an outdated, heavy rifle that many hunters and sport shooters used responsibly for decades. 5. Vz.58 – The AK’s Twin in Quebec City In 2017, the Quebec City mosque attacker carried a Vz.58 rifle, which jammed after two shots. Its presence alone tied it permanently to Canada’s gun debate. The Vz.58 looks like an AK-47 but is mechanically different. It fires 7.62×39mm rounds, common in hunting rifles. In Canada, magazines over five rounds have been illegal since the 1990s, yet supporters of the ban argue larger mags are easy to smuggle across the border. For officials, its military style and role in a mass shooting justify prohibition. Critics say it works like many hunting rifles and question why it belongs on the list of guns banned in Canada at all. Why Supporters Say Canada’s Assault-Style Gun Ban Saves Lives For those in favor, these rifles are tied to Canada’s darkest shootings. They argue that guns designed for fast, repeated fire give attackers an edge that no hunter needs. Survivors of Polytechnique and Dawson College have long called for tighter rules, saying these weapons symbolize threats to women and students. Supporters also warn that even with five-round magazine limits, smuggled high-capacity magazines are easy to find. That, they say, means the danger is not just theoretical but real. Hunting Rifles or Political Theatre? What Opponents Claim About the Gun Buyback Opponents say the ban unfairly targets licensed owners while doing little to stop crime. They point out that most shootings in Canada involve smuggled handguns, not rifles used on farms or at ranges. To them, calling a Mini-14 or an M305 an “assault weapon” is more about optics than function. Critics argue the buyback spends billions of dollars removing guns banned in Canada that were rarely used in street crime, while smuggling and gang violence continue unchecked. They frame the ban as a symbolic move that punishes people who followed the law while leaving real problems unsolved. Hunting Rifle or Assault Weapon: Should These Guns Stay Banned in Canada? After watching the footage, do you believe the guns banned in Canada should stay prohibited, or are they misunderstood hunting rifles? Share your view below 👇 Canada Gun Ban FAQ What guns are banned in Canada in 2025? Canada’s buyback program targets hundreds of firearms labeled as assault-style weapons. Some of the most controversial include the Ruger Mini-14, Beretta Cx4 Storm, AR-15, M14/M305, and Vz.58. Why are some hunting rifles banned in Canada? Supporters say these rifles are linked to Canada’s worst shootings and argue their rapid-fire design makes them too dangerous. Critics argue many are ordinary hunting rifles banned mainly for how they look. What is Canada’s gun buyback program? The buyback requires owners of banned rifles to surrender them for compensation. The government says this reduces public risk, while opponents claim it unfairly punishes licensed owners instead of targeting smuggled guns.